Cited by 411Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Mindfulness and emotion regulation

Roemer, Lizabeth, Williston, Sarah Krill, Rollins, Laura Grace·2015·Current Opinion in Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.02.006

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A burgeoning literature highlights the benefits of mindfulness-based interventions for promoting adaptive emotion regulation and alleviating difficulties in emotion regulation.

    “A burgeoning literature highlights the benefits of mindfulness-based interventions for promoting adaptive ER and alleviating difficulties in ER (Roemer et al., 2015).”
  • Individuals exhibiting greater dispositional mindfulness have reported an increased ability to regulate their well-being through reduced emotional reactivity and intensity, enhanced emotional recovery, and engagement in goal-directed behaviours.

    “Individuals exhibiting greater dispositional mindfulness have reported an increased ability to regulate their well-being through reduced emotional reactivity and intensity, enhanced emotional recovery, and engagement in goal-directed behaviours (Roemer et al., 2015).”
  • Trait mindfulness is thought to afford a more nuanced emotional awareness and experience and enhanced emotional recovery, indicating better emotion regulation abilities.

    “However, trait mindfulness is thought to afford a more nuanced emotional awareness and experience (Hill and Updegraff, 2010) and enhanced emotional recovery (Roemer et al., 2015), indicating better emotion regulation abilities, so the model we have tested is congruent with previous literature focusing solely on these two constructs.”
  • A growing body of theoretical articles and empirical studies suggests a connection between mindfulness training and the enhancement of emotion regulation strategies.

    “A growing body of theoretical articles and empirical studies suggests a connection between mindfulness training and the enhancement of emotion regulation strategies [30–34].”
  • A lack of longitudinal studies in clinical settings restricts conclusions about the nature and temporal progression of associations between mindfulness, emotion regulation, and symptom severity.

    “a lack of longitudinal studies in clinical settings restricts conclusions about these associations' nature and temporal progression [31].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roemer, L., Williston, S. K., & Rollins, L. G.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Corresponding author
Roemer, Lizabeth
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
3
Pages
52-57
ISSN
2352-250X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969276339
Cited by
411
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Opinion in Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
mindfulness, emotion regulation, adaptive emotion regulation, present-moment awareness, acceptance, emotional distress, emotional recovery, self-referential processing, goal-directed behavior, causal mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review