Cited by 1,501Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive Abilities and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Executive Functioning as a Predictor of Children's Mathematics Ability: Inhibition, Switching, and Working Memory

Bull, Rebecca, Scerif, Gaia·2001·Developmental Neuropsychology

Abstract

Children's mathematical skills were considered in relation to executive functions. Using multiple measures--including the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST), dual-task performance, Stroop task, and counting span-it was found that mathematical ability was significantly correlated with all measures of executive functioning, with the exception of dual-task performance. Furthermore, regression analyses revealed that each executive function measure predicted unique variance in mathematics ability. These results are discussed in terms of a central executive with diverse functions (Shallice & Burgess, 1996) and with recent evidence from Miyake, et al. (2000) showing the unity and diversity among executive functions. It is proposed that the particular difficulties for children of lower mathematical ability are lack of inhibition and poor working memory, which result in problems with switching and evaluation of new strategies for dealing with a particular task. The practical and theoretical implications of these results are discussed, along with suggestions for task changes and longitudinal studies that would clarify theoretical and developmental issues related to executive functioning.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15326942dn1903_3

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 67 references

4 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Elliott, C. D., Murray, D. J. & Pearson, L. S. (1979). British Ability Scales. Windsor, England: NFER-Nelson.
  2. 10.1037//0022-0663.92.2.377 · DOI
  3. 10.1037//0033-2909.109.2.163 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1037//0096-1523.25.1.39 · DOI
  5. Phillips, L. (1997). Do "frontal tests"measure executive function? Issues of assessment and evidence from fluency tests. In P. M. A. Rabbitt (Ed.), Methodology of Frontal and Executive Functions (pp. 191-214). Hove, England: Psychology Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Bull, R., & Scerif, G.
Affiliations
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Venue
Developmental Neuropsychology
Published
2001-06
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
273-293
ISSN
  • 1532-6942 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-5641
OpenAlex
W2142887785
Cited by
1,501
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 112 · 2017: 101 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 103 · 2013: 97 · 2012: 80
FWCI
13.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Nuffield Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
executive function, mathematical ability, children, inhibition, cognitive flexibility, working memory, central executive, dual-task performance, Stroop task, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, strategy evaluation
MeSH terms
Child, Cognition, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Mathematics, Memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review