Cited by 130Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Control-related beliefs and depressive symptoms in clinic-referred children and adolscents: Developmental differences and model specificity.

Weisz, John R., Southam-Gerow, Michael A., McCarty, Carolyn A.·2001·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

The contingency-competence-control (CCC) model links contingency and competence beliefs to perceived control and, in turn, to depression. However, a developmental perspective suggests that noncontingency may be too abstract a concept to be directly tied to depression before adolescence. We tested the CCC model and this developmental notion, using structural equation modeling, with 360 clinic-referred 8- to 17-year-olds. The CCC model fit the data well for the full sample accounting for 46% of the variance in depression. Separate analyses by age group placed perceived contingency in the best-fit model for adolescents (ages 12-17 years) but not for children (8-11 years). This suggests that abstract cause-effect concepts may have more direct affective impact after the cognitive changes of adolescence (e.g., formal operations) than before. Finally, the CCC model accounted for much more variance in depression than conduct problems, suggesting diagnostic specificity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.110.1.97

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lack of perceived competence was the strongest predictor of depression in the older group of children and teens.

    “Weisz et al. (2001) compared factors related to depressive symptoms in children and teens and found that lack of perceived competence was the strongest predictor of depression in the older group.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weisz, J. R., Southam-Gerow, M. A., & McCarty, C. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2001-02
Volume
110
Issue
1
Pages
97-109
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2122995682
Cited by
129
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k05mh001161-05, 5r01mh049522-06)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH 49522, K05-MH01161, R01MH057347, R01 MH57347)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
perceived control, depressive symptoms, competence beliefs, developmental differences, children, adolescents, clinic-referred children, conduct problems, diagnostic specificity, cognitive development, formal operations
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Child, Psychology, Child, Depression, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Models, Psychological, Psychometrics, Referral and Consultation, Sampling Studies, Self Disclosure, Sensitivity and Specificity, Conduct Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review