Cited by 522Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPersonality Traits and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the Confluence of Self-Esteem Maintenance Mechanisms

Tesser, Abraham·2000·Personality and Social Psychology Review

Abstract

A case is made for the substitutability of self-esteem regulation mechanisms such as cognitive dissonance reduction, self-affirmation, and social comparison. For example, a threat to self via cognitive dissonance might be reduced by a favorable social comparison outcome. To explain substitution, it is suggested that self-esteem regulation mechanisms inevitably produce affect and that affect mediates the completion of various self-esteem regulation processes. Substitution can be understood in terms of the transfer of affect from the initial mechanism to the substitute mechanism. To be effective, this transfer must take place without awareness. Also discussed is the substitution of self-esteem regulation mechanisms across different self-domains versus within a single self-domain. Current theory suggests that substitution might be more effective within domain; that is, it is better to bolster the aspect of self that has been threatened. It is suggested here, however, that substitution across self-domain might be relatively resilient and easier to accomplish.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327957pspr0404_1

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Aspinwall, L. G., 1997, Psychological Bulletin, 99, 229
  2. Bless, H., Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intrapersonal processes
  3. Carver, C. S., 1999, Advances in social cognition, 1
  4. Chartrand, T. L. (1999). Consequences of success and failure at automatic goal pursuit for mood, self-efficacy, and subsequent performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.
  5. Frederickson, B. L., Cognition and Emotion
  6. Martin, L. L., 1992, The construction of social judgments, 195
  7. Martin, L., 1996, Advances in social cognition, 1
  8. 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.589 · DOI
  9. 10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.723 · DOI
  10. Schwarz, N., 1990, Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior, 527
  11. Tesser, A., 1996, The psychology of action: Linking motivation and cognition to behavior, 48
  12. 10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.49 · DOI
  13. Zillman, D., 1983, Social psychophysiology. A sourcebook, 215

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 522

Metadata

Authors
Tesser, A.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Tesser, Abraham
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Review
Published
2000-11
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
290-299
ISSN
  • 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7957
OpenAlex
W2172118262
Cited by
521
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 28
FWCI
14.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
self-esteem regulation, dissonance reduction, self-affirmation, social comparison, affect transfer, self-threat, self-esteem maintenance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review