The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Psychology of Compensatory and Retributive Justice
Abstract
How do observers respond when the actions of one individual inflict harm on another? The primary reaction to carelessly inflicted harm is to seek restitution; the offender is judged to owe compensation to the harmed individual. The primary reaction to harm inflicted intentionally is moral outrage producing a desire for retribution; the harm-doer tust be punished. Reckless conduct, an intermediate case, provokes reactions that involve elements of both careless and intentional harm. The moral outrage felt by those who witness transgressions is a product of both cognitive interpretations of the event and emotional reactions to it. Theory about the exact nature of the emotional reactions is considered, along with suggestions for directions forfuture research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241 · cited 2×
“…on control motivation (e.g., Pittman, 1993; Pittman & Pittman, 1980), learned helplessness (e.g., Seligman, 1975), cognitive dissonance (e.g., Festinger, 1957), terror management (e.g., Soloman, Greenberg, & Pyszczynski, 1991), the just world hypothesis (Lerner, 1980), and the Piagetian…”
From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60107-0 · Cited by 3,424
Lerner, M. J. (1980) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0448-5 · Cited by 2,656
Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. V., Elson, S. B., Green, M. C., & Lerner, J. S. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.853 · Cited by 1,400
Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Lyon, D. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.681 · Cited by 1,323
Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60328-7 · Cited by 1,296
Dissonance and the pill: An attribution approach to studying the arousal properties of dissonance.
Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1974) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036651 · Cited by 577
Cited by
The dynamics of proactivity at work
Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002 · Cited by 2,057
Experimental Research on Just-World Theory: Problems, Developments, and Future Challenges.
Hafer, C. L., & Bègue, L. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.128 · Cited by 808
Third parties’ reactions to the abusive supervision of coworkers
Mitchell, M. S., Vogel, R. M., & Folger, R. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000002 · Cited by 337
Designing fair AI for managing employees in organizations: a review, critique, and design agenda
Robert, L. P., Pierce, C., Marquis, L., Kim, S., & Alahmad, R. (2020) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2020.1735391 · Cited by 268
Revenge: a multilevel review and synthesis
Jackson, J. C., Choi, V. K., & Gelfand, M. J. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103305 · Cited by 172
Not so innocent: Does seeing one's own capability for wrongdoing predict forgiveness?
Exline, J. J., Baumeister, R. F., Zell, A. L., Kraft, A. J., & Witvliet, C. V. O. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.495 · Cited by 146
Dhanani, L. Y., & LaPalme, M. L. (2019) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318816162 · Cited by 115
Wang, L., Restubog, S., Shao, B., Lu, V., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2018) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0460 · Cited by 110
The Positive Consequences of Pain: A Biopsychosocial Approach
Bastian, B., Jetten, J., Hornsey, M. J., & Leknes, S. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868314527831 · Cited by 91
Carriere, J. S., Donayre Pimentel, S., Yakobov, E., & Edwards, R. R. (2020) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnaa088 · Cited by 88
(2017) · doi:10.1111/pops.12395 · Cited by 87
McCall, C., Steinbeis, N., Ricard, M., & Singer, T. (2014) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00424 · Cited by 59
Laurin, K., & Plaks, J. E. (2014) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550614534698 · Cited by 24
Perceived Injustice Predicts Intention to Litigate: Findings from a Spinal Cord Injury Sample
Trost, Z., Monden, K. R., Buelow, M., Boals, A., & Scott, W. (2016) · Psychological Injury and Law · doi:10.1007/s12207-015-9245-z · Cited by 20
Sullivan, M. J. L., Adams, H., Yamada, K., Kubota, Y., Ellis, T., & Thibault, P. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.129 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Darley, J. M., & Pittman, T. S.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 324-336
- ISSN
- 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7957
- OpenAlex
- W2100368531
- Cited by
- 620
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
