Cited by 150Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiet, Metabolism, and Disease

Failure of mathematical indices to accurately assess insulin resistance in lean, overweight, or obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Diamanti-Kandarakis, Evanthia, Kouli, Chryssa, Alexandraki, Krystallenia, Spina, Giovanna·2004·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Insulin resistance is a common metabolic feature of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). In this study, we examined the validity of the mathematical indices [the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) and the homeostasis model of assessment (HOMA)] that calculate insulin sensitivity and their correlation to glucose utilization with the insulin infusion rate in 40 mU/m2·min by the euglycemic clamp (M) in women with PCOS. We studied 59 women with PCOS (20 lean, 16 overweight, and 23 obese subjects). Euglycemic clamp testing was performed, and QUICKI, HOMA, total testosterone, fasting insulin, fasting glucose, and glucose-to-insulin ratio were estimated. No difference was found in testosterone and glucose levels among the three groups. Lean or overweight women compared with obese women differed in insulin levels, glucose-to-insulin ratio, QUICKI, and HOMA (P < 0.01). No statistical difference was found between lean and overweight women in the above parameters. M differed when lean women were compared with overweight (P < 0.002) or obese women (P < 0.0001); however, no statistical difference was observed between overweight and obese women. No significant correlation was found between M and QUICKI or HOMA. We conclude that mathematical indices should be applied with caution in different insulin-resistant populations and should not be considered a priori equivalent to the euglycemic clamp technique.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2003-031205

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Measurement of insulin resistance is difficult.

    “measurement is difficult [147,148]”
  • Reported prevalence rates of insulin resistance in obese and lean women with PCOS vary widely.

    “reported prevalence rates in obese and lean women vary widely [147,152]”

    From Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Evolutionary Adaptation to Lifestyle and the Environment (2022) · cites this paper as [147]

    The Results and Discussion (page not provided) compare insulin-sensitivity measures in lean, overweight, and obese women with PCOS and note variability in glucose utilization. They do not report or compare prevalence rates of insulin resistance in those groups. A search for “prevalence” found only a reference about PCOS prevalence, not the claimed rates. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diamanti-Kandarakis, E., Kouli, C., Alexandraki, K., & Spina, G.
Affiliations
  • Endocrine Section of the First Department of Internal Medicine, Athens University School of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Athens 115 27, Greece
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2004-03-01
Volume
89
Issue
3
Pages
1273-1276
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W1991026143
Cited by
150
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
15.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Keywords
insulin resistance, polycystic ovary syndrome, QUICKI, HOMA, insulin sensitivity index, euglycemic clamp, glucose utilization, body weight, obesity, lean women, overweight women, testosterone, glucose-to-insulin ratio
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Mathematics, Obesity, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Reproducibility of Results, Glucose Clamp Technique, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review