Cited by 93Regulation of Appetite and ObesityAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesAdipose Tissue and Metabolism

Adiposity Signaling and Biological Defense Against Weight Gain: Absence of Protection or Central Hormone Resistance?

Schwartz, Michael W., Niswender, Kevin D.·2004·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

An abundant and compelling literature supports the existence of a homeostatic system that dynamically adjusts energy intake and energy expenditure to promote stability of body fat mass. In the context of this system, the ease with which many individuals gain weight is difficult to explain. Some have argued that energy homeostasis operates primarily to defend against weight loss and that, over the course of evolution, biological defense against weight gain was not selected for. According to this Absence of Protection model, obesity is seen as the natural result of living in an obesigenic environment. An alternative hypothesis, termed the Central Resistance model, proposes that under normal circumstances, the energy homeostasis system provides an effective defense against weight gain as well as weight loss and that common forms of obesity involve genetic or acquired defects (or interactions between them) that impair the function of this system. Here, we discuss these dichotomous possibilities within the context of current literature regarding energy homeostasis and suggest a strategy for distinguishing between them.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2004-0906

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Common forms of obesity develop due to genetic or acquired defects that impair the response to elevated leptin levels.

    “common forms of obesity develop due to genetic or acquired defects that impair the response to elevated leptin levels (159).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwartz, M. W., & Niswender, K. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Schwartz, Michael W.
  • Niswender, Kevin D.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2004-12
Volume
89
Issue
12
Pages
5889-5897
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2123926386
Cited by
93
References
72
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2r01dk012829-36)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK064857-01, DK 12829, R01DK052989, DK-52989, K08DK064857)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-32273)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
Keywords
energy homeostasis, obesity, weight gain, weight loss, energy expenditure, energy intake, fat mass
MeSH terms
Animals, Central Nervous System, Drug Resistance, Energy Metabolism, Genotype, Homeostasis, Humans, Insulin, Models, Biological, Obesity, Signal Transduction, Weight Gain, Leptin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review