Cited by 91Bone health and osteoporosis researchAdrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsHormonal Regulation and Hypertension

Altered bone mass and turnover in female patients with adrenal incidentaloma: the effect of subclinical hypercortisolism

Open access
Torlontano, M., Chiodini, I., Pileri, M., Guglielmi, G., Cammisa, M., Modoni, S., Carnevale, V., Trischitta, V. +1 more·1999·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

The strategy of treatment for patients with adrenal incidentalomas (AI) may depend upon the presence of hormonal hypersecretion. Although alterations of bone turnover have been recently reported, data on bone mineral density (BMD) are not available in AI patients. We evaluated bone turnover and BMD in 32 female AI patients and 64 matched controls. Spinal and femoral BMD were similar in patients and controls. Serum bone GLA protein (6.8+/-3.5 vs. 8.8+/-3.2 ng/mL; P<0.005) and PTH (48.8+/-15.1 vs. 37.2+/-10.9 pg/mL; P<0.0001) were different in patients and controls. Patients were then subdivided into 2 groups: with (n = 8; group A) or without (n = 24; group B) subclinical hypercortisolism. PTH was higher (P<0.05) in group A than in group B and in both groups than in controls (57.1+/-13.6, 46.0+/-14.8, and 37.2+/-10.9 pg/mL, respectively), and bone GLA protein was lower in group A than in group B and controls (3.8+/-2.3, 7.5+/-3.1, and 8.8+/-3.2 ng/mL, respectively; P<0.05). Serum type I cross-linked C telopeptide and fasting urinary deoxypyridinoline/ creatinine were not different in the three groups. BMD at each site was lower (P<0.05) in group A than in group B and controls. Bone mass and metabolism are altered in AI patients with subclinical hypercortisolism and should be taken into account, therefore, when addressing the treatment of choice for these patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jcem.84.7.5856

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both trabecular and cortical bone loss have been described in patients with ACS.

    “Both trabecular (65,261-263) and cortical (259,262,264-266) bone loss have been described in patients with ACS.”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [259]

  • In patients with ACS, bone formation is reported as decreased, normal, or increased alongside normal bone resorption.

    “However, in patients with ACS, a mixed picture is reported with either decreased, normal, or even increased bone formation reported alongside normal bone resorption (229,242,259-262).”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [259]

  • Few studies have reported elevated urinary free cortisol levels in more than 25% of patients with adrenal incidentalomas.

    “Few studies reported a high frequency (i.e. higher than 25%) of elevated UFC levels in patients with AI (21,43,48,49,53,60).”

    From Diagnosis and Treatment of Subclinical Hypercortisolism (2011) · cites this paper as [43]

  • Low serum ACTH levels are frequently found in patients with adrenal incidentalomas.

    “Low serum ACTH levels are frequently found in AI patients (19,21,32,36,40,43,44,48,49,56,60,61).”

    From Diagnosis and Treatment of Subclinical Hypercortisolism (2011) · cites this paper as [43]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Torlontano, M., Chiodini, I., Pileri, M., Guglielmi, G., Cammisa, M., Modoni, S., Carnevale, V., Trischitta, V., & Scillitani, A.
Affiliations
Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza (IT)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
1999-07
Volume
84
Issue
7
Pages
2381-2385
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2140162560
Cited by
91
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Keywords
adrenal incidentaloma, subclinical hypercortisolism, bone mineral density, bone turnover, osteocalcin, parathyroid hormone, female patients, C-terminal telopeptide, deoxypyridinoline, bone metabolism
MeSH terms
Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, Adult, Aged, Amino Acids, Collagen, Creatinine, Female, Femur, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Middle Aged, Peptides, Spine, Bone Density, Osteocalcin, Bone Remodeling, Collagen Type I

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review