Cited by 156Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological Disorders and Treatments

Idebenone treatment fails to slow cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease

Thal, L. J., Grundman, M., Berg, J., Ernstrom, K., Margolin, R., Pfeiffer, E., Weiner, M. F., Zamrini, E. +1 more·2003·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of idebenone on the rate of decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: A 1-year, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was conducted. Subjects were over age 50 with a diagnosis of probable AD and had Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores between 12 and 25. Subjects were treated with idebenone 120, 240, or 360 mg tid, each of which was compared with placebo. Primary outcome measures were the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subcomponent (ADAS-Cog) and a Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC). Secondary outcome measures included measurements of activities of daily living, the Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale, and the MMSE. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-six subjects were enrolled and randomized to the four groups. Except for a slight difference in age, there were no differences in patient characteristics at baseline. For the primary outcome measures, there were no significant overall differences between the treatment groups in the prespecified four-group design. In an exploratory two-group analysis comparing all three treated groups combined with placebo, drug-treated patients performed better on the ADAS-Cog in both the intent-to-treat (ITT) and completers analyses. There were no differences in the CGIC scores for the ITT or completers analyses in either the four-group or the two-group analyses. There were no overall differences on any of the secondary outcome measures in any of the analyses. CONCLUSION: Idebenone failed to slow cognitive decline in AD that was of sufficient magnitude to be clinically significant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000096376.03678.c1

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another large trial showed no benefits of idebenone.

    “These results are controversial since another large trial showed no benefits170.”

    From Mitochondrial Approaches for Neuroprotection (2008) · cites this paper as [170]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thal, L. J., Grundman, M., Berg, J., Ernstrom, K., Margolin, R., Pfeiffer, E., Weiner, M. F., Zamrini, E., & Thomas, R. G.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2003-12-09
Volume
61
Issue
11
Pages
1498-1502
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2098790447
Cited by
156
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG 10483, U19AG010483)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
idebenone, Alzheimer's disease, cognitive decline, treatment efficacy, ADAS-Cog, Clinical Global Impression of Change, behavioral pathology, activities of daily living
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition Disorders, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Ubiquinone, Benzoquinones, Treatment Failure, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review