Cited by 299Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Regional rates of neocortical atrophy from normal aging to early Alzheimer disease

Open access
McDonald, C. R., McEvoy, L. K., Gharapetian, L., Fennema-Notestine, C., Hagler, D. J., Holland, D., Koyama, A., Brewer, J. B. +1 more·2009·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the spatial pattern and regional rates of neocortical atrophy from normal aging to early Alzheimer disease (AD). METHODS: Longitudinal MRI data were analyzed using high-throughput image analysis procedures for 472 individuals diagnosed as normal, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or AD. Participants were divided into 4 groups based on Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes score (CDR-SB). Annual atrophy rates were derived by calculating percent cortical volume loss between baseline and 12-month scans. Repeated-measures analyses of covariance were used to evaluate group differences in atrophy rates across regions as a function of impairment. Planned comparisons were used to evaluate the change in atrophy rates across levels of disease severity. RESULTS: In patients with MCI-CDR-SB 0.5-1, annual atrophy rates were greatest in medial temporal, middle and inferior lateral temporal, inferior parietal, and posterior cingulate. With increased impairment (MCI-CDR-SB 1.5-2.5), atrophy spread to parietal, frontal, and lateral occipital cortex, followed by anterior cingulate cortex. Analysis of regional trajectories revealed increasing rates of atrophy across all neocortical regions with clinical impairment. However, increases in atrophy rates were greater in early disease within medial temporal cortex, whereas increases in atrophy rates were greater at later stages in prefrontal, parietal, posterior temporal, parietal, and cingulate cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Atrophy is not uniform across regions, nor does it follow a linear trajectory. Knowledge of the spatial pattern and rate of decline across the spectrum from normal aging to Alzheimer disease can provide valuable information for detecting early disease and monitoring treatment effects at different stages of disease progression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181b16431

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pattern of brain atrophy is closely related to regional NFT accumulation found in Alzheimer's disease patients and is quite different from the pattern of amyloid plaques.

    “The pattern of brain atrophy is closely related to regional NFT accumulation found in AD patients (and quite different to the pattern of amyloid plaques) (Braak and Braak, 1991, McDonald et al., 2009), and thus atrophy remains a valuable biomarker in the evaluation of tau based therapeutics.”

    From In vivo imaging of tau pathology using multi-parametric quantitative MRI (2015) · cites this paper as McDonald et al., 2009

    The Abstract and Discussion describe regional patterns of atrophy in MCI and early AD, but do not compare those patterns with neurofibrillary tangles or amyloid plaques. Searches for NFT accumulation and amyloid plaques found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed relationship. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Sluimer JD, van der Flier WM, Karas GB, et al. Whole- brain atrophy rate and cognitive decline: longitudinal MR study of memory clinic patients. Radiology 2008;248: 590 -598.
  2. Fox NC, Freeborough PA. Brain atrophy progression mea- sured from registered serial MRI: validation and applica- tion to Alzheimer's disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7:1069 -1075.
  3. Ezekiel F, Chao L, Kornak J, et al. Comparisons between global and focal brain atrophy rates in normal aging and Alzheimer disease: boundary shift integral versus tracing of the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus. Alzheimer Dis As- soc Disord 2004;18:196 -201.
  4. Chan D, Janssen JC, Whitwell JL, et al. Change in rates of cerebral atrophy over time in early-onset Alzheimer's dis- ease: longitudinal MRI study. Lancet 2003;362:1121- 1122.
  5. Jack CR Jr, Weigand SD, Shiung MM, et al. Atrophy rates accelerate in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neurol- ogy 2008;70:1740 -1752.
  6. Ridha BH, Barnes J, Bartlett JW, et al. Tracking atrophy progression in familial Alzheimer's disease: a serial MRI study. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:828 -834.
  7. Dickerson BC, Sperling RA. Neuroimaging biomarkers for clinical trials of disease-modifying therapies in Alzhei- mer's disease. NeuroRx 2005;2:348 -360.
  8. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, et al. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS- ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology 1984;34:939 -944.
  9. Lynch CA, Walsh C, Blanco A, et al. The Clinical Demen- tia Rating sum of box score in mild dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2006;21:40 -43.
  10. Jovicich J, Czanner S, Greve D, et al. Reliability in multi- site structural MRI studies: effects of gradient non- linearity correction on phantom and human data. Neuroimage 2006;30:436 -443.
  11. Sled JG, Zijdenbos AP, Evans AC. A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuni- formity in MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998; 17:87-97.
  12. Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, et al. Whole brain segmenta- tion: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 2002;33:341-355.
  13. Fischl B, Dale AM. Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:11050 -11055.
  14. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM. Cortical surface-based analysis, II: inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coor- dinate system Neuroimage 1999;9:195-207.
  15. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Tootell RB, Dale AM. High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum Brain Mapp 1999;8:272-284.
  16. Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI. Cortical surface-based analysis, I: segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neu- roimage 1999;9:179 -194.
  17. Buckner RL, Head D, Parker J, et al. A unified approach for morphometric and functional data analysis in young, old, and demented adults using automated atlas-based head size normalization: reliability and validation against manual measurement of total intracranial volume. Neuro- image 2004;23:724 -738.
  18. Holland D, Hagler DJJ, Fennema-Notestine C, et al. Lon- gitudinal nonlinear registration and quantitative analysis of change in whole brain and regions of interest. Alzheimers Dementia J Alzheimers Assoc 2008;4:T288.
  19. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Voxel-based morphometry: the methods. Neuroimage 2000;11:805-821.
  20. Christensen GE, Rabbitt RD, Miller MI. Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics. IEEE Trans Image Process 1996;5:1435-1447.
  21. Whitwell JL, Shiung MM, Przybelski SA, et al. MRI pat- terns of atrophy associated with progression to AD in am- nestic mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 2008;70: 512-520.
  22. Morra JH, Tu Z, Apostolova LG, et al. Automated map- ping of hippocampal atrophy in 1-year repeat MRI data from 490 subjects with Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and elderly controls. Neuroimage 2009;45: S3-S15.
  23. Smith CD, Chebrolu H, Wekstein DR, et al. Age and gender effects on human brain anatomy: a voxel-based morphometric study in healthy elderly. Neurobiol Aging 2007;28:1075-1087.
  24. Resnick SM, Goldszal AF, Davatzikos C, et al. One-year age changes in MRI brain volumes in older adults. Cereb Cortex 2000;10:464 -472.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDonald, C. R., McEvoy, L. K., Gharapetian, L., Fennema-Notestine, C., Hagler, D. J., Holland, D., Koyama, A., Brewer, J. B., & Dale, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • From the Department of Psychiatry (C.R.M., C.F.-N.), Multimodal Imaging Laboratory (C.R.M., L.K.M., L.G., C.F.-N., D.J.H., D.H., A.K., J.B.B., A.M.D.), Department of Radiology (L.K.M., D.J.H., D.H., J.B.B., A.M.D.), and Department of Neurosciences (J.B.B., A.M.D.), University of California, San Diego, CA.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2009-08-11
Volume
73
Issue
6
Pages
457-465
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W1974681848
Cited by
299
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 19
FWCI
15.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (U01AG024904, AG024904)
  • Alzheimer's Association (U01 AG024904)
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb (U01 AG024904, AG024904)
  • Eli Lilly and Company (U01 AG024904, AG024904)
  • Pfizer (AG024904, U01 AG024904)
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (U01AG024904, AG024904)
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (U01 AG024904, AG024904)
  • Northern California Institute for Research and Education (U01 AG024904)
  • Elan (U01 AG024904)
  • Eisai (U01 AG024904, AG024904)
  • National Institutes of Health (n01mh22005-16-0-1, 5r01ag024506-03, 5u01ag024904-10, 5r43ns061023-02, U01-AG024904, AG024904)
  • University of California, Los Angeles
  • University of California, San Diego
  • National Institute on Aging (U01-AG-024904, R01AG031224, R01-AG024506, AG 024904, R01AG022381, K01AG029218, U19AG010483, 1U01AG024904-02)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (N01 MH-22005, MH079146-01A2, K01MH079146, R01MH079752, P50MH081755, P30MH062512)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U54NS056883, K23NS056091, 2 R01 NS18741-23A1, NS056091, 5R43NS061023, 1R43NS061023, K23NS050305, P50NS022343, R01NS018741)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (U01 AG024904, AG024904)
  • National Center for Research Resources (U24RR021992, U24RR021382, U24 RR21382, U01 AG024904, U24RR019701)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, normal aging, medial temporal lobe, posterior cingulate cortex, inferior parietal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, disease progression, Clinical Dementia Rating
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Atrophy, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Disease Progression, Neocortex, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review