Cited by 161Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications

Development and evaluation of a multiplexed mass spectrometry based assay for measuring candidate peptide biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) CSF

Open access
Spellman, Daniel S., Wildsmith, Kristin R., Honigberg, Lee A., Tuefferd, Marianne, Baker, David, Raghavan, Nandini, Nairn, Angus C., Croteau, Pascal +7 more·2015·PROTEOMICS – Clinical Applications

Abstract

Purpose: We describe the outcome of the Biomarkers Consortium CSF Proteomics Project (where CSF is cerebral spinal fluid), a public–private partnership of government, academia, nonprofit, and industry. The goal of this study was to evaluate a multiplexed MS‐based approach for the qualification of candidate Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers using CSF samples from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative. Experimental design: Reproducibility of sample processing, analytic variability, and ability to detect a variety of analytes of interest were thoroughly investigated. Multiple approaches to statistical analyses assessed whether panel analytes were associated with baseline pathology (mild cognitive impairment (MCI), AD) versus healthy controls or associated with progression for MCI patients, and included (i) univariate association analyses, (ii) univariate prediction models, (iii) exploratory multivariate analyses, and (iv) supervised multivariate analysis. Results: A robust targeted MS‐based approach for the qualification of candidate AD biomarkers was developed. The results identified several peptides with potential diagnostic or predictive utility, with the most significant differences observed for the following peptides for differentiating (including peptides from hemoglobin A, hemoglobin B, and superoxide dismutase) or predicting (including peptides from neuronal pentraxin‐2, neurosecretory protein VGF (VGF), and secretogranin‐2) progression versus nonprogression from MCI to AD. Conclusions and clinical relevance: These data provide potential insights into the biology of CSF in AD and MCI progression and provide a novel tool for AD researchers and clinicians working to improve diagnostic accuracy, evaluation of treatment efficacy, and early diagnosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/prca.201400178

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [22]Hansson O Zetterberg H Buchhave P Londos E Association between CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer’s disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a follow-up study Lancet Neurol 2006 5 3 228 234 16488378
  2. [25]Fagan AM Perrin RJ Upcoming candidate cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease Biomark. Med 2012 6 4 455 476 22917147 PMC3477809

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spellman, D. S., Wildsmith, K. R., Honigberg, L. A., Tuefferd, M., Baker, D., Raghavan, N., Nairn, A. C., Croteau, P., Schirm, M., Allard, R., Lamontagne, J., Chelsky, D., Hoffmann, S., Potter, W. Z., & Initiative, A. D. N.
Affiliations
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
  • Roche (United States) (US)
  • Janssen (Belgium) (BE)
  • Janssen Research & Development LLC Titusville NJ USA
  • Yale University (US)
  • Caprion (Canada) (CA)
  • Caprion Pharmaceuticals Montreal QC Canada
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (US)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
  • Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (US)
Corresponding author
Spellman, Daniel S.
Venue
PROTEOMICS – Clinical Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-24
Volume
9
Issue
7-8
Pages
715-731
ISSN
  • 1862-8346 (ISSN-L)
  • 1862-8354
OpenAlex
W1968352263
Cited by
161
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3
FWCI
7.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PROTEOMICS - CLINICAL APPLICATIONS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01ag024904-10)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Institute on Aging (U01-AG-024904, P50AG047270)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, cerebrospinal fluid, peptide biomarkers, targeted mass spectrometry, multiplex assay, mild cognitive impairment, neuroimaging biomarkers, superoxide dismutase, VGF, diagnostic biomarkers, early diagnosis
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Amino Acid Sequence, Apolipoproteins E, Biological Assay, Female, Humans, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Peptides, Quality Control, Mass Spectrometry, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers, Disease Progression, Area Under Curve, Principal Component Analysis, Neuroimaging, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review