Cited by 613Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

The NINCDS‐ADRDA Work Group criteria for the clinical diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease: A clinicopathologic study of 57 cases

Tierney, Mary C., Fisher, Rory H., Lewis, Anthony J., Zorzitto, Maria L., Snow, W. Gary, Reid, David W., Nieuwstraten, Paula·1988·Neurology

Abstract

Neuropathologic confirmation is required to validate the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group criteria for the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Neuropathologic inclusion and exclusion criteria for AD, however, are not uniform. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the confirmation rate for the Work Group criteria against differing neuropathologic criteria for AD. The sample consisted of 57 cases, 22 of which had received a clinical diagnosis of AD. Nine neuropathologic criteria for AD were applied in a blind fashion to each of the 57 cases. Our results indicated that, depending on the neuropathologic criteria applied, the clinicopathologic agreement ranged from 64% to 86%. These findings demonstrate the need for universally accepted neuropathologic and clinical criteria for AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.38.3.359

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There have been several changes in neuropathological diagnostic criteria, including Khachaturian 1985, Tierney 1988, CERAD 1991, NIA-Reagan 1997.

    “there have been several changes in neuropathological diagnostic criteria, including the “Khachaturian criteria” of 1985 (27), the “Tierney” criteria of 1988 (28), The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) criteria in 1991 (29), and the National Institute on Aging (NIA)-Reagan criteria in 1997 (30).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tierney, M. C., Fisher, R. H., Lewis, A. J., Zorzitto, M. L., Snow, W. G., Reid, D. W., & Nieuwstraten, P.
Affiliations
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
Venue
Neurology
Published
1988-03
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
359-359
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2082665846
Cited by
613
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 17
FWCI
26.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, NINCDS-ADRDA criteria, diagnosis, clinicopathological correlation, diagnostic agreement
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Brain Ischemia, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Parkinson Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review