Cited by 489Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

Lifetime risk of dementia and Alzheimer's disease: The impact of mortality on risk estimates in the Framingham Study

Seshadri, S., Wolf, P. A., Beiser, A., Au, R., McNulty, K., White, R., D'Agostino, R. B.·1997·Neurology

Abstract

We estimated the remaining lifetime risks of developing Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia from all causes, based on data from longitudinal population studies. The risk of developing AD during one's lifetime depends on both disease incidence and life expectancy. Conventional estimates of cumulative incidence overestimate the risk when there is a substantial probability of mortality due to competing causes. A total of 2,611 cognitively intact subjects (1,061 men, 1,550 women; mean age, 66 +/- 7 years) were prospectively evaluated for the development of AD or other dementia. A modified survival analysis was used to estimate both cumulative incidence and the sex-specific remaining lifetime risk estimates for quinquennial age groups above age 65 years. Over a 20-year follow-up period, 198 subjects developed dementia (120 with AD). The remaining lifetime risk of AD or other dementia depended on sex, being higher in women, but varied little with age between 65 and 80 years. In a 65-year-old man, the remaining lifetime risk of AD was 6.3% (95% CI, 3.9 to 8.7) and the remaining lifetime risk of developing any dementing illness was 10.9% (95% CI, 8.0 to 13.8); corresponding risks for a 65-year-old woman were 12% (95% CI, 9.2 to 14.8) and 19% (95% CI, 17.2 to 22.5). The cumulative incidence between age 65 and 100 years was much higher: for AD, 25.5% in men and 28.1% in women; for dementia, 32.8% in men and 45% in women. The actual remaining lifetime risk of AD or dementia varies with age, sex, and life expectancy and is lower than the hypothetical risk estimated by a cumulative incidence in the same population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.49.6.1498

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study using Framingham Heart Study data suggested that men in the study appeared to have a lower risk for dementia due to survival bias.

    “A study using Framingham Heart Study data suggested that men in the study appeared to have a lower risk for dementia due to “survival bias,” in which the men who survived to age 65 or beyond and were included in the study were the ones with a healthier cardiovascular risk profile (men have a higher rate of death from cardiovascular disease in middle age than women) and thus a lower risk for dem”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [288]

  • Women live longer than men on average, and older age is the greatest risk factor for Alzheimer's.

    “Women live longer than men on average, and older age is the greatest risk factor for Alzheimer's.”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [288]

  • The rate of progression from MCI to AD is similar in men and women aged 70-79, but higher in women than men after age 80.

    “According to a Mayo Clinic study on aging, the progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to AD was similar in men and women in the ages of 70–79, but higher in women than men after 80 years of age.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seshadri, S., Wolf, P. A., Beiser, A., Au, R., McNulty, K., White, R., & D'Agostino, R. B.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
1997-12
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
1498-1504
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2007172048
Cited by
489
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc038038-022)
  • National Institute on Aging (5-RO1-AG08122-08, R01AG008122)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01-HC-38038)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS017950)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, dementia, cumulative incidence, competing risks, mortality, sex differences, life expectancy, older adults, survival analysis
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Risk Factors, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review