Cited by 289Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor and the Risk for Dementia: The Framingham Heart Study

Open access
Weinstein, Galit, Beiser, Alexa S., Choi, Seung Hoan, Preis, Sarah R., Chen, Tai C., Vorgas, Demetrios, Au, Rhoda, Pikula, Aleksandra +4 more·2014·JAMA Neurology

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: In animal studies, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has been shown to impact neuronal survival and function and improve synaptic plasticity and long-term memory. Circulating BDNF levels increase with physical activity and caloric restriction, thus BDNF may mediate some of the observed associations between lifestyle and the risk for dementia. Some prior studies showed lower circulating BDNF in persons with Alzheimer disease (AD) compared with control participants; however, it remains uncertain whether reduced levels precede dementia onset. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether higher serum BDNF levels in cognitively healthy adults protect against the future risk for dementia and AD and to identify potential modifiers of this association. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Framingham Study original and offspring participants were followed up from 1992 and 1998, respectively, for up to 10 years. We used Cox models to relate BDNF levels to the risk for dementia and AD and adjusted for potential confounders. We also ran sensitivity analyses stratified by sex, age, and education, as well as related BDNF genetic variants to AD risk. This community-based, prospective cohort study involved 2131 dementia-free participants aged 60 years and older (mean [SD] age, 72 [7] years; 56% women). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Ten-year incidence of dementia and AD. RESULTS: During follow-up, 140 participants developed dementia, 117 of whom had AD. Controlling for age and sex, each standard-deviation increment in BDNF was associated with a 33% lower risk for dementia and AD (P = .006 and P = .01, respectively) and these associations persisted after additional adjustments. Compared with the bottom quintile, BDNF levels in the top quintile were associated with less than half the risk for dementia and AD (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28-0.85; P = .01; and hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.86; P = .02, respectively). These associations were apparent only among women, persons aged 80 years and older, and those with college degrees (hazard ratios for AD: 0.65, [95% CI, 0.50-0.85], P = .001; 0.63 [95% CI, 0.47-0.85], P = .002; and 0.27 [95% CI, 0.11-0.65], P = .003, respectively). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor genetic variants were not associated with AD risk. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Higher serum BDNF levels may protect against future occurrence of dementia and AD. Our findings suggest a role for BDNF in the biology and possibly in the prevention of dementia and AD, especially in select subgroups of women and older and more highly educated persons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.4781

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weinstein, G., Beiser, A. S., Choi, S. H., Preis, S. R., Chen, T. C., Vorgas, D., Au, R., Pikula, A., Wolf, P. A., DeStefano, A. L., Vasan, R. S., & Seshadri, S.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Seshadri, Sudha
Venue
JAMA Neurology
Published
2014-01-01
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
55
ISSN
2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112473391
Cited by
289
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 18
FWCI
13.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc25195-41-0-1)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG010129, AG-16495, R01AG031287, AG031287, AG08122, AG033193, R01AG016495, P30AG013846, R01AG033193, R01AG008122)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01‐HC25195, HL93029, N01-HC-025195, R01HL093029, U01HL096917)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS17950, R01NS017950)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
brain-derived neurotrophic factor, serum BDNF, dementia risk, Alzheimer's disease, neurodegeneration biomarkers, Framingham Heart Study, sex differences, older adults, educational attainment, physical activity, caloric restriction, lifestyle factors, dementia prevention, synaptic plasticity, neuronal survival, long-term memory, cognitive aging, neuroinflammation, neuroprotection
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Dementia, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Risk, Sensitivity and Specificity, Incidence, Proportional Hazards Models, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review