Cited by 224Blood donation and transfusion practicesExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesNonprofit Sector and Volunteering

Will There Be Blood? Incentives and Displacement Effects in Pro-Social Behavior

Open access
Lacetera, Nicola, Macis, Mario, Slonim, Robert·2012·American Economic Journal: Economic Policy

Abstract

We present evidence from nearly 14,000 American Red Cross blood drives and from a natural field experiment showing that economic incentives have a positive effect on blood donations without increasing the fraction of donors who are ineligible to donate. The effect increases with the incentive's economic value. However, a substantial proportion of the increase in donations is explained by donors leaving neighboring drives without incentives to attend drives with incentives; this displacement also increases with the economic value of the incentive. We conclude that extrinsic incentives stimulate pro-social behavior, but unless displacement effects are considered, the effect may be overestimated. (JEL D64, H41, I12)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/pol.4.1.186

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lacetera, N., Macis, M., & Slonim, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy
Published
2012-02-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
186-223
ISSN
  • 1945-7731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-774X
OpenAlex
W2036522266
Cited by
222
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
34.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Economic Journal Economic Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Blood donation and transfusion practices
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Keywords
blood donation, economic incentives, extrinsic rewards, displacement effects, prosocial behavior, incentive magnitude, donor eligibility, charitable giving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review