Cited by 33Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Effects of skin surface temperature on photoplethysmograph

Open access
Jeong, In Choel, Yoon, Hyungro, Kang, Hyunjeong, Yeom, Hojun·2014·Journal of Healthcare Engineering

Abstract

Photoplethysmograph (PPG) has been widely used to investigate various cardiovascular conditions. Previous studies demonstrated effects of temperature of the measurement environment; however, an integrated evaluation has not been established in environments with gradual air temperature variation. The purpose of this study is to investigate variations and relationships of blood pressure (BP), PPG and cardiovascular parameters such as heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO) and total peripheral resistance (TPR), by changing skin surface temperature (SST). Local mild cooling and heating was conducted on 16 healthy subjects. The results showed that local SST changes affected Finometer blood pressures (Finger BP), PPG components and TPR, but not the oscillometric blood pressure (Central BP), HR, SV and CO, and indicated that temperature must be maintained and monitored to reliably evaluate cardiovascular conditions in temperature‐varying environments.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In 16 healthy subjects, local skin cooling/heating changed skin surface temperature and significantly affected Finometer finger blood pressure, PPG components, and total peripheral resistance, while oscillometric central BP, HR, SV, and CO were not consistently affected. The authors conclude that temperature must be maintained and monitored for reliable PPG-based cardiovascular evaluation.

Key findings

  • Cooling: chamber air temperature decreased by 9.4±0.7°C; left SST decreased by 8.8±2.5°C and right SST by 1.6±1.4°C. Finometer SBP increased by 10±9.0 mmHg and DBP by 7±6.0 mmHg (p<0.01), while oscillometric SBP/DBP did not change significantly.
  • Heating: chamber air temperature increased by 19.5±1.2°C; left SST increased by 6.3±2.6°C and right SST by 1.1±1.7°C. Finometer SBP increased by 6±7.8 mmHg and DBP by 5±6.2 mmHg (p<0.01); oscillometric SBP did not change significantly, and the text reports oscillometric DBP significantly increased although Table 2 shows a −5±7.1 mmHg difference.
  • PPG DC foot and DC peak were significantly negatively correlated with SST (r ranges −0.634 to −0.980 and −0.594 to −0.980, p<0.01); PPG AC component was positively correlated with SST (r 0.108 to 0.941), significant in 12 of 16 subjects.
  • TPR showed significant negative correlations with SST (r −0.443 to −0.904, p<0.01), while HR, SV, and CO correlations were significant in individuals but not fixed across all subjects.

Methods

  • Pilot experimental study using local mild cooling and heating in a temperature-controlled chamber; each participant was tested under both heating and cooling conditions.
  • Sixteen healthy participants (age 26±2.1 years; BMI 23±4.8 kg/m²; resting HR 73±8.8 beats/min), not undergoing drug treatment or experiencing Raynaud’s phenomenon; they refrained from smoking, alcohol, and extreme exercise for 12 h and caffeine for 4 h before the experiment.
  • PPG was measured on both index fingers, Finometer on the left middle finger, oscillometric BP on the right upper arm, and SST by contact sensors on both fourth fingers plus infrared thermography; analyses used paired-samples tests and correlations in SPSS 12.0.

Limitations

  • Stated by the paper: small number of subjects and no consideration of gender differences.
  • Evident from the text: this is a pilot study with a short 20-min protocol, individual variability in SST and cardiovascular responses, and an apparent inconsistency in the heating oscillometric DBP result (text says increased; Table 2 shows a decrease).

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1260/2040-2295.5.4.429

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 7 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Local skin surface temperature (SST) changes affected Finometer blood pressures (Finger BP), PPG components and total peripheral resistance (TPR).

    “The results showed that local SST changes affected Finometer blood pressures (Finger BP), PPG components and TPR, but not the oscillometric blood pressure (Central BP), HR, SV and CO, and indicated that temperature must be maintained and monitored to reliably evaluate cardiovascular conditions in temperature-varying environments.”
    • Also stated in: § 5. CONCLUSION · boosted
      “Changes in cardiovascular characteristics and peripheral vessels by SST change were demonstrated.”
    • Also stated in: § 4. DISCUSSION · plain
      “The oscillometric BP was not affected but Finometer BP, which employed PPG estimation method, was affected by changes in SST because changes in blood flow and blood vessels were generated by the temperature adaptation mechanism.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    During the cooling period, left SST decreased by 8.8±2.5°C (p<0.01).

    “With the chamber temperature decrease, the left SST (-8.8±2.5˚C,p<0.01) and the right SST (-1.6±1.4,p<0.01) were significantly decreased.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    SST thermogram changes were identical to SST sensor changes.

    “SST thermogram changes were identical to SST sensor changes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    During the heating period, Finometer DBP increased by 5±6.2 mmHg (p<0.01).

    “Both Finometer systolic blood pressure (SBP) (6±7.8mmHg,p<0.01) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (5±6.2mmHg,p<0.01) significantly increased.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    During the cooling period, Finometer diastolic blood pressure (DBP) increased by 7±6.0 mmHg (p<0.01).

    “Both Finometer systolic blood pressure (SBP) (10±9.0mmHg,p<0.01) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (7±6.0mmHg,p<0.01) significantly increased.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 9
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 3
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Local SST changes did not affect oscillometric blood pressure (Central BP), heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO).

    “The results showed that local SST changes affected Finometer blood pressures (Finger BP), PPG components and TPR, but not the oscillometric blood pressure (Central BP), HR, SV and CO, and indicated that temperature must be maintained and monitored to reliably evaluate cardiovascular conditions in temperature-varying environments.”
    • Also stated in: § 4. DISCUSSION · plain
      “The oscillometric BP was not affected but Finometer BP, which employed PPG estimation method, was affected by changes in SST because changes in blood flow and blood vessels were generated by the temperature adaptation mechanism.”
    • Also stated in: § 3.1. BPs and Temperatures · plain
      “However, oscillometric SBP and DBP did not show significant changes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingown data

    During the cooling period, the chamber air temperature decreased by 9.4±0.7°C (p<0.01).

    “During the cooling period, the chamber air temperature was decreased to -9.4±0.7˚C,p < 0.01).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Overall changes in HR, SV, and CO did not show significant correlations with SST.

    “The overall changes in HR, SV, and CO did not show significant correlations with SST, while TPR showed an increasing trend.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    During the heating period, the chamber air temperature increased by 19.5±1.2°C (p<0.01).

    “During the heating period, the chamber air temperature was increased to 19.5±1.2˚C(p<0.01).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    TPR had significant negative correlations with SST ranging from -0.443 to -0.904.

    “Significant negative correlations (p<0.01) were calculated in the range between - 0.443 and -0.904.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A previous study demonstrated that the data of noncooled right hand did not significantly change, but could demonstrate a similar decreasing trend.

    “A previous study [17] demonstrated that the data of noncooled right hand did not significantly change, but could demonstrate a similar decreasing trend.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Four Finometer cardiovascular parameters show only changes in the entire body but not local changes.

    “Four Finometer cardiovascular parameters show only changes in the entire body but not local changes [19].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    This result demonstrated that local contraction of blood vessels due to local changes in SST caused changes in the total cardiovascular resistance because the hands have functional importance and excellent control of heat loss.

    “This result demonstrated that local contraction of blood vessels due to local changes in SST caused changes in the total cardiovascular resistance because the hands have functional importance and excellent control of heat loss [16,18].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [16]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [18]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The results of the present experiments demonstrated good agreement with the above phenomenon for the cooling process, but weak agreement for the heating process.

    “The results of the present experiments demonstrated good agreement with the above phenomenon for the cooling process, but weak agreement for the heating process.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Cooling of the blood vessel walls causes the loss of contractive capacity, while heating increases its capacity.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although the cooling period did not affect the right hand directly, the nonexperimental hand was affected by the mechanism of body temperature control, so correlated results were produced.

    “Although the cooling period did not affect the right hand directly, the nonexperimental hand was affected by the mechanism of body temperature control, so correlated results were produced.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The results also reflected that the PPG component changes were linked to changes in the body temperature and the theory that maintenance of body temperature under the increase and decrease of heat loss was mainly achieved through the blood flow control.

    “The results also reflected that the PPG component changes were linked to changes in the body temperature and the theory that maintenance of body temperature under the increase and decrease of heat loss was mainly achieved through the blood flow control [16].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Limitations of this pilot study include the small number of subjects and not considering the gender difference.

    “Limitations of this pilot study include the small number of subjects and not considering the gender difference.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
12 of 12
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    All fingers have similar SST distributions.

    “this comparison was performed under the assumption that all fingers have similar SST distributions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cooling of the blood vessel walls causes the loss of contractive capacity, while heating increases its capacity.

    “It is well known that cooling of the blood vessel walls causes the loss of contractive capacity, while heating increases its capacity.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Local skin surface temperature changes affect PPG components.

    “Jeong et al. found that local skin surface temperature changes affect PPG components of 16 healthy subjects aged 23–30 years (26 ± 2.1) and BMI ranging between 20 and 26 (23 ± 4.8), hence recommending that temperature be monitored in order to reliably evaluate cardiovascular parameters [158].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Abstract says oscillometric BP was unaffected despite a significant DBP change

    Major

    The abstract says SST changes did not affect oscillometric blood pressure, whereas the results report a significant change in oscillometric DBP during heating.

  • Heating-related oscillometric DBP is described as increasing but decreases in the table

    Minor

    The results say oscillometric DBP significantly increased during heating, but Table 2 reports a fall from 76 to 71 mmHg, with an after-minus-before difference of −5 mmHg.

  • Reported TPR correlation range includes a result not marked p<0.01

    Minor

    The text describes the full TPR correlation range as significant at p<0.01. Its endpoint of −0.443 is marked with one asterisk in Table 4, which the table defines as p<0.05 rather than p<0.01.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeong, I. C., Yoon, H., Kang, H., & Yeom, H.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Eulji University (KR)
Venue
Journal of Healthcare Engineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
429-438
ISSN
  • 2040-2295 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-2309
OpenAlex
W2015455093
Cited by
33
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Healthcare Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Eulji University
  • Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (2013-02-01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
photoplethysmography, skin surface temperature, blood pressure, finger blood pressure, oscillometric blood pressure, heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, cardiovascular monitoring
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Skin, Skin Temperature, Vasoconstriction, Vasodilation, Photoplethysmography, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review