The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Voice of the Customer
Abstract
In recent years, many U.S. and Japanese firms have adopted Quality Function Deployment (QFD). QFD is a total-quality-management process in which the “voice of the customer” is deployed throughout the R&D, engineering, and manufacturing stages of product development. For example, in the first “house” of QFD, customer needs are linked to design attributes thus encouraging the joint consideration of marketing issues and engineering issues. This paper focuses on the “Voice-of-the-Customer” component of QFD, that is, the tasks of identifying customer needs, structuring customer needs, and providing priorities for customer needs. In the identification stage, we address the questions of (1) how many customers need be interviewed, (2) how many analysts need to read the transcripts, (3) how many customer needs do we miss, and (4) are focus groups or one-on-one interviews superior? In the structuring stage the customer needs are arrayed into a hierarchy of primary, secondary, and tertiary needs. We compare group consensus (affinity) charts, a technique which accounts for most industry applications, with a technique based on customer-sort data. In the stage which provides priorities we present new data in which product concepts were created by product-development experts such that each concept stressed the fulfillment of one primary customer need. Customer interest in and preference for these concepts are compared to measured and estimated importances. We also address the question of whether frequency of mention can be used as a surrogate for importance. Finally, we examine the stated goal of QFD, customer satisfaction. Our data demonstrate a self-selection bias in satisfaction measures that are used commonly for QFD and for corporate incentive programs. We close with a brief application to illustrate how a product-development team used the voice of the customer to create a successful new product.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A national customer satisfaction barometer: the Swedish experience
Fornell, C. (1992) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252129 · Cited by 5,641
Unit weighting schemes for decision making
Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1975) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(75)90044-6 · Cited by 673
Cited by
Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers
Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. (1996) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099 · Cited by 4,672
Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews
Mason, M. (2010) · Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research · doi:10.17169/fqs-11.3.1428 · Cited by 2,786
Thompson, C. J. (1997) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379703400403 · Cited by 1,142
A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United States
Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E. (1997) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299706100201 · Cited by 709
The Service Revolution and the Transformation of Marketing Science
Rust, R. T., & Huang, M.-H. (2014) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2013.0836 · Cited by 578
Consumer trust in e-commerce in the United States, Singapore and China
TEO, T., & LIU, J. (2007) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2005.02.001 · Cited by 564
Identifying Customer Needs from User-Generated Content
Timoshenko, A., & Hauser, J. R. (2019) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2018.1123 · Cited by 513
Self-citationThe Value of Different Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty Metrics in Predicting Business Performance
Morgan, N. A., & Rego, L. L. (2006) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1050.0180 · Cited by 505
Disruptiveness of innovations: measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity
Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. K. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.511 · Cited by 410
Oliver, S., Clarke-Jones, L., Rees, R., Milne, R., Buchanan, P., Gabbay, J., Gyte, G., Oakley, A., & Stein, K. (2004) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta8150 · Cited by 400
Customer participation in services: domain, scope, and boundaries
Dong, B., & Sivakumar, K. (2017) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-017-0524-y · Cited by 265
Metrics: You are what you measure!
Hauser, J., & Katz, G. (1998) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/s0263-2373(98)00029-2 · Cited by 228
Self-citationMeinel, M., Eismann, T. T., Baccarella, C. V., Fixson, S. K., & Voigt, K.-I. (2020) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2020.02.002 · Cited by 98
The creator economy: An introduction and a call for scholarly research
Peres, R., Schreier, M., Schweidel, D. A., & Sorescu, A. (2024) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.07.005 · Cited by 40
Gaskin, S. P., Griffin, A., Hauser, J. R., Katz, G. M., & Klein, R. L. (2010) · Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing · doi:10.1002/9781444316568.wiem05020 · Cited by 18
Self-citationColas, C., Goutte, J., Creac'h, C., Fontana, L., Vericel, M.-P., Manzanares, J., Peuriere, M., Akrour, M., Martin, C., Presles, E., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.554291 · Cited by 6
Morales Medina, G. G., Morales Cruz, E. U., & Pérez Ambrosio, J. J. (2026) · Cultura científica y tecnológica · doi:10.20983/culcyt.2026.1.2.2
Metadata
- Authors
- Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R.
- Venue
- Marketing Science
- Published
- 1993-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-27
- ISSN
- 0732-2399 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-548X
- OpenAlex
- W2075904323
- Cited by
- 1,914
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 56.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.