The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation
Abstract
The ability to integrate dispersed pockets of expertise and institute an organizational repository of knowledge is considered to be vital for sustained effectiveness in contemporary business environments. Information technologies provide cost-effective functionalities for building knowledge platforms through systematic acquisition, storage, and dissemination of organizational knowledge. However, in order to gain the value-adding potential of organizational knowledge, it is not sufficient to simply adopt and deploy IT-enabled knowledge platforms. These platforms must be assimilated into the ongoing work processes in organizations. Yet, theories of technology innovation and use suggest that a variety of institutional, social, and political factors blend together in influencing the extent to which complex information technologies are actually assimilated into organizational practice. Therefore, this research addresses a significant question: What forces influence the assimilation of knowledge platforms in organization? Given the significant gap between the adoption and actual assimilation of complex technologies into organizations, this is an important question. Empirical evidence is generated by examining the forces influencing the assimilation of CASE technologies in systems development projects in organizations. CASE is considered to be one of the most mature knowledge platforms in contemporary organizations. The empirical evidence sheds light on the role of institutional forces that influence the rate of assimilation of the technology. The findings have significant implications for further research and practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939 · cited 2×
“Such knowledge-in-use requires substantial codification so that it can be stored within the repository and made accessible for use with subsequent systems development projects (Kogut and Zander 1992, Walsh and Ungson 1991).”
BackgroundMethodMoore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018 · Cited by 6,479
Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249689 · Cited by 6,006
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.375 · Cited by 5,649
Research works printed but not linked: 72
- 10.1287/mnsc.33.4.525 · DOI
- Bagozzi R. P., 1980, Causal Models in Marketing
- 10.1287/isre.5.4.350 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0049124192021002004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/oso/9780195094787.001.0001 · DOI
- Browne M. W., 1993, Testing Structural Equation Models, 136
- Bruce T., 1989, Database Programming and Design, 2, 60
- Chin W., 1998, MIS Quart., 22, VII
- Chin W., 1996, Proc. 17th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, 21
- 10.1287/mnsc.36.2.123 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · DOI · Paper page
- Demsetz H., 1991, The Nature of the Firm, 159, 10.1093/oso/9780195065909.003.0010 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.5.2.121 · DOI · Paper page
- Dixon R. L., 1992, Winning with CASE: Managing Modern Software Development
- Feuche M., 1989, MIS Week
- 10.2307/249520 · DOI
- 10.2307/3151718 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/129852.129854 · DOI
- 10.1016/0749-5978(90)90047-D · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.27.4.459 · DOI
- Goodman P. S., 1996, Acad. Management Executive, 7
- 10.2307/248845 · DOI
- Hoffer J. A., 1996, Modern Systems Analysis and Design
- 10.2307/258105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/236156.236183 · DOI
- 10.1109/52.136161 · DOI
- 10.2307/256170 · DOI
- Kwon T. H., 1987, Critical Issues in Information Systems Research
- 10.2307/259060 · DOI · Paper page
- Lefkovitz H. C., 1985, Proposed American National Standards Information Resource Dictionary System
- 10.1016/0048-7333(88)90006-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.34.10.1252 · DOI · Paper page
- Löhmoller J., 1984, LVPLS Program Manual: Latent Variables Path Analysis with Partial Least Squares
- 10.1177/009365087014005003 · DOI · Paper page
- Martin J., 1989, Information Engineering
- Martin J., 1990, Information Engineering, Book I: Introduction
- Martin J., 1990, Information Engineering, Book II: Analysis and Design
- Martin J., 1990, Information Engineering, Book III: Design and Construction
- Martin M., 1995, J. Systems Management, 6, 54
- McClure C., 1989, CASE Is Software Automation
- McClure C., 1992, The Three R’s of Software Automation: Re-engineering, Repository, and Reuse
- Nelson R. R., 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change
- Nonaka I., 1995, The Knowledge Creating Company
- 10.2307/249774 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.6.4.423 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2393300 · DOI · Paper page
- Polanyi M., 1962, The Tacit Dimension
- 10.1057/ejis.1995.11 · DOI
- Rai A., 1993, IRM J., 6, 21
- Rogers E. M., 1983, Diffusion of Innovations
- Saga V., 1994, Diffusion, Transfer, and Implementation of Information Technology, 67
- Scott W. R., 1995, Institutions and Organizations
- Slevin D. P., 1987, Sloan Management Rev., 29, 33
- Spender J. C., 1992, Advances in Strategic Management, 3
- 10.1002/smj.4250171106 · DOI · Paper page
- Stone J. A., 1993, Inside ADW and IEF: The Promises and Reality of CASE
- Tabachnik B. G., 1989, Using Multivariate Statistics
- Tannenbaum A., 1994, Implementing a Corporate Repository: The Models Meet Reality
- Tornatzky L. G., 1990, The Processes of Technological Innovation
- 10.1109/TEM.1982.6447463 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF02291170 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.5.1.98 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590 · DOI
- 10.1145/129852.129860 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.1991.4278992 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/163430.163447 · DOI
- Weick K. E., 1990, Technology and Organization, 1
- 10.2307/2393372 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/001316447403400104 · DOI
- Wold H., 1982, A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis, Volume I: Methods, 325
- Yourdon E., 1992, Decline and Fall of the American Programmer
- 10.1287/mnsc.30.6.727 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x · Cited by 8,159
Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148781 · Cited by 3,921
Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World
Yoo, Y., Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K., & Majchrzak, A. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0771 · Cited by 2,469
Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., & Xu, S. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0487 · Cited by 1,440
Chatterjee, D., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4132321 · Cited by 945
Self-citationInformation System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants
Sabherwal, R., Jeyaraj, A., & Chowa, C. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0583 · Cited by 685
Chen, S.-C., & Lin, C.-P. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.025 · Cited by 606
Sharma, R., & Yetton, P. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036548 · Cited by 470
Determinants of E-Business Use in U.S. Firms
Hsu, P.-F., Kraemer, K. L., & Dunkle, D. (2006) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415100401 · Cited by 330
Fosso Wamba, S. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102544 · Cited by 269
A multi-project model of key factors affecting organizational benefits from enterprise systems
(2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.5555/2017458.2017464 · Cited by 259
A Multi-Project Model of Key Factors Affecting Organizational Benefits from Enterprise Systems1
Seddon, P. B., Calvert, C., & Yang, S. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20721429 · Cited by 211
Shao, Z., Feng, Y., & Hu, Q. (2017) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2017.01.005 · Cited by 119
Supply chain innovation diffusion: Going beyond adoption
Hazen, B. T., Overstreet, R. E., & Cegielski, C. G. (2012) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09574091211226957 · Cited by 117
The assimilation of RFID technology by Chinese companies: A technology diffusion perspective
Wei, J., Lowry, P. B., & Seedorf, S. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.05.001 · Cited by 112
The effects of e-Government cloud assimilation on public value creation: An empirical study of China
Liang, Y., Qi, G., Zhang, X., & Li, G. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.101397 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Purvis, R. L., Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-135
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2138653284
- Cited by
- 677
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 42.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.