The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas
Abstract
Despite increasing recognition of the importance of fostering innovation among shopfloor employees, little empirical research has been conducted on the topic. Moreover, within work psychology, studies have tended to focus on the generation of ideas (creativity) rather than on their implementation. This study examines the impact of individual perceptions of individual, group and organizational factors on both elements of innovation. It was found that the suggestion of ideas was more highly related to individual (personal and job) characteristics than the group and organizational characteristics; whereas the implementation of ideas was more strongly predicted by group and organizational characteristics. As expected, interactions were found between the number of suggestions made and group and organizational characteristics, demonstrating how successful implementation of new ideas requires both their formulation in the first place and an appropriately supportive environment. Analysis to explore which factors have the greatest impact on the innovation process was also conducted. The practical, theoretical and methodological implications of the study are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076546 · Cited by 7,246
Cited by
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314527128 · Cited by 3,103
A New Model of Work Role Performance: Positive Behavior in Uncertain and Interdependent Contexts
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24634438 · Cited by 2,533
Making Things Happen: A Model of Proactive Motivation
Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310363732 · Cited by 2,096
Measuring Innovative Work Behaviour
De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x · Cited by 1,644
The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance.
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392 · Cited by 1,224
Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership
Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014 · Cited by 1,173
Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations
Hughes, D. J., Lee, A., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2018) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.001 · Cited by 1,080
Anderson, N., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2004) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.236 · Cited by 1,035
Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.41330806 · Cited by 738
Chamberlin, M., Newton, D. W., & Lepine, J. A. (2017) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12185 · Cited by 532
Parker, S. K. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.620 · Cited by 438
Leadership, creativity and innovation: a meta-analytic review
Lee, A., Legood, A., Hughes, D., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Knight, C. (2020) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2019.1661837 · Cited by 425
Linking justice, trust and innovative work behaviour to work engagement
A. Agarwal, U. (2014) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-02-2012-0019 · Cited by 389
Implicating trust in the innovation process†
Clegg, C., Unsworth, K., Epitropaki, O., & Parker, G. (2002) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317902321119574 · Cited by 289
Self-citationMichaelis, B., Stegmaier, R., & Sonntag, K. (2010) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683941011035304 · Cited by 219
Michaelis, B., Stegmaier, R., & Sonntag, K. (2009) · Journal of Change Management · doi:10.1080/14697010903360608 · Cited by 216
Buhl, A., Schmidt-Keilich, M., Muster, V., Blazejewski, S., Schrader, U., Harrach, C., Schäfer, M., & Süßbauer, E. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.259 · Cited by 188
Kajzer Mitchell, I., & Walinga, J. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.162 · Cited by 164
Do lean manufacturing practices have negative impact on job satisfaction?
Minh, K. S., Zailani, S., Iranmanesh, M., & Heidari, S. (2019) · International Journal of Lean Six Sigma · doi:10.1108/ijlss-11-2016-0072 · Cited by 77
Guillén, L., & Kunze, F. (2019) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21953 · Cited by 44
(2013) · Cited by 43
Criteria Issues and Team Effectiveness
Mathieu, J. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology, Volume 2 · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928286.013.0027 · Cited by 34
Stankevičiūtė, Ž., Staniškienė, E., & Ciganė, U. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12145511 · Cited by 23
Al-Shammari, M. M., & Khalifa, N. Y. (2019) · International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals · doi:10.4018/ijhcitp.2019070102 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E., & Harrington, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 265-285
- ISSN
- 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8325
- OpenAlex
- W2120714620
- Cited by
- 1,104
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
