Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 351

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is There a Career Penalty for Mothers' Time Out? A Comparison of Germany, Sweden and the United States

Aisenbrey, S., Evertsson, M., Grunow, D.·2009·Social Forces
DOI 10.1353/sof.0.0252
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article focuses on three countries with distinct policies toward motherhood and work: Germany, Sweden and the United States. We analyze the length of mothers' time out of paid work after childbirth and the short-term career consequences for mothers. In the United States, we identify a career punishment even for short timeout periods; long time-out periods increase the risk of a downward move and reduce the chances of an upward move. In Germany, long time-out periods destabilize the career and, the longer the leave, the greater the risk of either an upward or downward move. In Sweden, we find a negative effect of time out on upward moves. Hence, even in “woman-friendly” Sweden, women's career prospects are better if they return to paid work sooner rather than later.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/sof.0.0252

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 351

Metadata

Authors
Aisenbrey, S., Evertsson, M., & Grunow, D.
Venue
Social Forces
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2009-12-01
Volume
88
Issue
2
Pages
573-605
ISSN
  • 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-7605
DOI
10.1353/sof.0.0252
OpenAlex
W2099168173
Cited by
351
References
51
FWCI
33.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.