The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A General Panel Model with Random and Fixed Effects: A Structural Equations Approach
Open accessAbstract
Fixed and random effects models for longitudinal data are common in sociology. Their primary advantage is that they control for time-invariant omitted variables. However, analysts face several issues when they employ these models. One is the uncertainty of whether to apply the fixed effects (FEM) versus the random effects (REM) models. Another less discussed issue is that the FEM and REM models as usually implemented might be insufficiently flexible. For instance, the effects of variables, including the latent time-invariant variable, might change over time rather than be constant as in the usual FEM and REM. The latent time-invariant variable might correlate with some variables and not others. Lagged endogenous variables might be necessary. Alternatives that move beyond the classic FEM and REM models are known, but they involve different estimators and software that make these extended models difficult to implement and to compare. This paper presents a general panel model that includes the standard FEM and REM as special cases. In addition, it provides a sequence of nested models that provide a richer range of models that researchers can easily compare with likelihood ratio tests and fit statistics. Furthermore, researchers can implement our general panel model and its special cases in widely available structural equation models (SEMs) software. The paper is oriented towards applied researchers with most technical details given in the appendix and footnotes. An extended empirical example illustrates our results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297968 · Cited by 33,272
(2001) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 27,577
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-d · Cited by 19,880
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
Structural Equations with Latent Variables.
Clogg, C. C., & Bollen, K. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2072165 · Cited by 17,442
Self-citationStatistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,265
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
Baltagi, B. H. (2021) · Springer Texts in Business and Economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5 · Cited by 15,104
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424 · Cited by 12,298
Testing Structural Equation Models.
Clogg, C. C., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1995) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2580595 · Cited by 8,211
Self-citationHsiao, C. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139839327 · Cited by 7,869
Hsiao, C. (2022) · doi:10.1017/9781009057745 · Cited by 7,869
A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291170 · Cited by 7,330 · cited 1×
“Current guidelines would describe a model's [End Page 12] fit to the data as inadequate if the Tucker and Lewis (”
MethodWhat To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2082979 · Cited by 6,840
Bayesian model selection in social research
Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/271063 · Cited by 6,823
Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data
Booth, D. E. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.2000.10486013 · Cited by 5,627
On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data
Mundlak, Y. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913646 · Cited by 5,412
Statistically based tests for the number of common factors
Steiger, J. H. (1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,413
Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994) · Cited by 2,388
Panel data and unobservable individual effects
Hausman, J., & Taylor, W. (1981) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(81)90085-3 · Cited by 2,309
The Wage Penalty for Motherhood
Budig, M. J., & England, P. (2001) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240106600203 · Cited by 2,279
Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models.
Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002004 · Cited by 1,831
Self-citationAsymptotically distribution‐free methods for the analysis of covariance structures
Browne, M. W. (1984) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1984.tb00789.x · Cited by 1,768
(1996) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 1,733
Latent Curve Models: A Structural Equation Perspective
Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2005) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471746096 · Cited by 1,729
Self-citationChoosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit.
McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.107.2.247 · Cited by 1,438
Latent Variables Analysis: Applications for Developmental Research.
AA, Eye, A. V., & Clogg, C. C. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291370 · Cited by 1,376
Advanced Structural Equation Modeling
(2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315827414 · Cited by 1,331
Direct and Indirect Effects: Classical and Bootstrap Estimates of Variability
Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. (1990) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/271084 · Cited by 1,305
Self-citationA GENERAL METHOD FOR ESTIMATING A LINEAR STRUCTURAL EQUATION SYSTEM*
Jöreskog, K. G. (1970) · ETS Research Bulletin Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.1970.tb00783.x · Cited by 1,106
Pearl, J. (2022) · Probabilistic and Causal Inference · doi:10.1145/3501714.3501736 · Cited by 1,033
Some New Results on Indirect Effects and Their Standard Errors in Covariance Structure Models
Sobel, M. E. (1986) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270922 · Cited by 1,006
Panel Models in Sociological Research: Theory into Practice
Halaby, C. N. (2004) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110629 · Cited by 946
T IME-S ERIES–C ROSS-S ECTION D ATA: What Have We Learned in the Past Few Years?
Beck, N. (2001) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.271 · Cited by 916
Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences.
King, M., Goldberger, A. S., & Duncan, O. D. (1974) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2230507 · Cited by 803
The Effect of Children on Women's Wages
Waldfogel, J. (1997) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657300 · Cited by 737
Fixed Effects Regression Methods for Longitudinal Data Using SAS®
(2006) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2006.s370 · Cited by 632
Power of the Likelihood Ratio Test in Covariance Structure Analysis
Satorra, A., & Saris, W. E. (1985) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294150 · Cited by 485
Kilbourne, B. S., England, P., Farkas, G., Beron, K., & Weir, D. (1994) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/230578 · Cited by 477
Deterring Delinquents: A Rational Choice Model of Theft and Violence
Matsueda, R. L., Kreager, D. A., & Huizinga, D. (2006) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240607100105 · Cited by 467
Total, Direct, and Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Bollen, K. A. (1987) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/271028 · Cited by 449
Self-citationMarital Happiness, Marital Duration, and the U-Shaped Curve: Evidence from a Five-Wave Panel Study
VanLaningham, J., Johnson, D. R., & Amato, P. (2001) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.2001.0055 · Cited by 419
Is Biology Destiny? Birth Weight and Life Chances
Conley, D., & Bennett, N. G. (2000) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240006500308 · Cited by 399
Wilson, S. E., & Butler, D. M. (2007) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpl012 · Cited by 382
Space Meets Time: Integrating Temporal and Contextual Influences on Mental Health in Early Adulthood
Wheaton, B., & Clarke, P. (2003) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/1519758 · Cited by 365
Bayesian Model Selection in Structural Equation Models
Raftery, A. E. (1992) · Cited by 364
Weak Ties, Information, and Influence: How Workers Find Jobs in a Local Russian Labor Market
Yakubovich, V. (2005) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240507000303 · Cited by 347
Using Panel Data to Estimate the Effects of Events
ALLISON, P. D. (1994) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124194023002002 · Cited by 321
Income Inequality, Development, and Dependence: A Reconsideration
Alderson, A. S., & Nielsen, F. (1999) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312249906400409 · Cited by 248
European Integration and Income Inequality
Beckfield, J. (2006) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240607100605 · Cited by 241
George, E. I. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences · doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess0989.pub2 · Cited by 188
Random Coefficient Models for Time-Series—Cross-Section Data: Monte Carlo Experiments
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (2007) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpl001 · Cited by 176
Robustness issues in structural equation modeling: a review of recent developments
Satorra, A. (1990) · Quality and Quantity · doi:10.1007/bf00152011 · Cited by 170
Explaining Deindustrialization: Globalization, Failure, Or Success?
Alderson, A. S. (1999) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312249906400506 · Cited by 167
The effects of job displacement on job quality: Findings from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study
Brand, J. E. (2006) · Research in Social Stratification and Mobility · doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2006.03.001 · Cited by 101
Self-citationFamily Migration and Labor Force Outcomes: Sex Differences in Occupational Context
Shauman, K. A., & Noonan, M. C. (2007) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.2007.0079 · Cited by 100
The Childhood Living Arrangements of Children and the Characteristics of Their Marriages
Teachman, J. D. (2004) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/0192513x03255346 · Cited by 88
The Flemish Movement in Belgium After World War II: A Dynamic Analysis
Nielsen, F. (1980) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095244 · Cited by 76
The Expansion of National Educational Systems: Tests of a Population Ecology Model
Nielsen, F., & Hannan, M. T. (1977) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094752 · Cited by 60
Statistical Power in Covariance Structure Models
Matsueda, R. L., & Bielby, W. T. (1986) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270921 · Cited by 56
A survey of recent theoretical developments in the econometrics of panel data
Baltagi, B. H., & Raj, B. (1992) · Empirical Economics · doi:10.1007/bf01192477 · Cited by 53
Covariance Structure Models for Fixed and Random Effects
Teachman, J. D., Duncan, G. J., Yeung, W. J., & LEVY, D. (2001) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124101030002005 · Cited by 50
Cited by
Three Extensions of the Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model
Mulder, J. D., & Hamaker, E. L. (2021) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2020.1784738 · Cited by 1,151
Berry, D., & Willoughby, M. T. (2017) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12660 · Cited by 737
A unified framework of longitudinal models to examine reciprocal relations.
Usami, S., Murayama, K., & Hamaker, E. L. (2019) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000210 · Cited by 437
Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.005 · Cited by 440
Ketokivi, M., & McIntosh, C. N. (2017) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2017.05.001 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Bollen, K. A., & Brand, J. E.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-09-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-34
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-7605
- OpenAlex
- W2064984736
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 16.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.