CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 601

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Age and visual search: expanding the useful field of view

Ball, Karlene K., Beard, Bettina L., Roenker, Daniel L., Miller, Richard L., Griggs, David S.·1988·Journal of the Optical Society of America A
DOI 10.1364/josaa.5.002210
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The useful field of view is defined as the visual area in which information can be acquired within one eye fixation. We studied visual search within this context and found a reduction in the size of the field as a function of age. This loss, however, was recovered partially with practice. Standard acuity and perimetric tests of visual field, although diagnostic of disease, underestimate the degree of difficulty experienced by visually healthy older adults in everyday activities requiring the use of peripheral vision. To aid in predicting such performance, a model incorporating the effects of distractors and secondary task demands was developed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/josaa.5.002210

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Kosnik, 1988, J. Geront., 43, 63, 10.1093/geronj/43.3.P63 · DOI
  2. Drance, 1967, Am. J. Ophthalmol., 63, 1667, 10.1016/0002-9394(67)93644-6 · DOI
  3. Wolf, 1967, Highway Res. Rec., 167, 1
  4. Williams, 1983, Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt., 60, 888, 10.1097/00006324-198311000-00003 · DOI
  5. Haas, 1986, Am. J. Ophthalmol., 101, 199, 10.1016/0002-9394(86)90595-7 · DOI
  6. Jaffe, 1986, Arch. Ophthalmol., 104, 1021, 10.1001/archopht.1986.01050190079043 · DOI
  7. Brenton, 1986, Ophthalmologica, 193, 56, 10.1159/000309679 · DOI
  8. Campbell, 1966, Traffic Safety Res. Rev., 10, 36
  9. Moore, 1982, Transport Road Res. Lab., 142, 1
  10. Johnson, 1986, Arch. Ophthalmol., 101, 371, 10.1001/archopht.1983.01040010371002 · DOI
  11. Avolio, 1986, Human Factors, 27, 577, 10.1177/001872088502700506 · DOI
  12. Sanders, 1970, Ergonomics, 13, 101, 10.1080/00140137008931124 · DOI
  13. Leibowitz, 1969, Human Factors, 11, 387, 10.1177/001872086901100409 · DOI
  14. Ikeda, 1975, Percept. Psychophys., 18, 255, 10.3758/BF03199371 · DOI
  15. Williams, 1982, Human Factors, 24, 683, 10.1177/001872088202400605 · DOI
  16. Sekuler, 1986, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 3, 864, 10.1364/JOSAA.3.000864 · DOI
  17. Drury, 1978, Human Factors, 20, 597, 10.1177/001872087802000509 · DOI
  18. Scialfa, 1987, Psychol. Aging, 2, 14, 10.1037/0882-7974.2.1.14 · DOI
  19. Bloomfield, 1972, Human Factors, 14, 139, 10.1177/001872087201400203 · DOI
  20. Engle, 1977, Vision Res., 17, 95, 10.1016/0042-6989(77)90207-3 · DOI
  21. Treisman, 1980, Cogn. Psychol., 12, 97, 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Bergen, 1983, Nature, 303, 696, 10.1038/303696a0 · DOI
  23. Cerella, 1985, J. Geront., 40, 727, 10.1093/geronj/40.6.727 · DOI
  24. Ball, 1987, Gerontologist, 27, 166A
  25. Carter, 1983, J. Geront., 38, 318, 10.1093/geronj/38.3.318 · DOI
  26. Leibowitz, 1955, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 45, 76, 10.1364/JOSA.45.000076 · DOI
  27. Scialfa, 1987, J. Geront., 42, 579, 10.1093/geronj/42.6.579 · DOI
  28. Layton, 1975, Psychol. Bull., 82, 875, 10.1037/0033-2909.82.6.875 · DOI
  29. Farkas, 1980, J. Geront., 35, 207, 10.1093/geronj/35.2.207 · DOI
  30. Madden, 1982, Exp. Aging Res., 8, 91, 10.1080/03610738208258403 · DOI
  31. Plude, 1983, Dev. Psychol., 19, 508, 10.1037/0012-1649.19.4.508 · DOI
  32. Kline, 1975, J. Geront., 30, 307, 10.1093/geronj/30.3.307 · DOI
  33. Kline, 1975, Exp. Aging Res., 1, 17, 10.1080/03610737508257943 · DOI
  34. Walsh, 1976, J. Geront., 31, 181, 10.1093/geronj/31.2.178 · DOI
  35. Walsh, 1978, J. Exp. Psychol. Perform., 4, 232, 10.1037/0096-1523.4.2.232 · DOI
  36. Walsh, 1979, J. Geront., 34, 234, 10.1093/geronj/34.2.234 · DOI
  37. Hertzog, 1976, J. Geront., 31, 428, 10.1093/geronj/31.4.428 · DOI
  38. Salthouse, 1982, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 111, 176, 10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.176 · DOI
  39. Walsh, 1988, J. Am. Opt. Assoc., 59, 301
  40. Kosnik, 1986, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 27, 1720
  41. Morgan, 1988, J. Am. Opt. Assoc., 59, 278

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ball, K. K., Beard, B. L., Roenker, D. L., Miller, R. L., & Griggs, D. S.
Venue
Journal of the Optical Society of America A
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
1988-12-01
Volume
5
Issue
12
Pages
2210
ISSN
  • 1084-7529
  • 1520-8532
DOI
10.1364/josaa.5.002210
Cited by
601
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review