Cited by 156Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPediatric health and respiratory diseasesRespiratory viral infections research

Meditation or exercise for preventing acute respiratory infection: a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Barrett, B., Hayney, M. S., Muller, D., Rakel, D., Ward, A., Obasi, C. N., Brown, R., Zhang, Z. +7 more·2012·The Annals of Family Medicine

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate potential preventive effects of meditation or exercise on incidence, duration, and severity of acute respiratory infection (ARI) illness. METHODS: Community-recruited adults aged 50 years and older were randomized to 1 of 3 study groups: 8-week training in mindfulness meditation, matched 8-week training in moderate-intensity sustained exercise, or observational control. The primary outcome was area-under-the-curve global illness severity during a single cold and influenza season, using the Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey (WURSS-24) to assess severity. Health care visits and days of missed work were counted. Nasal wash collected during ARI illness was assayed for neutrophils, interleukin-8, and viral nucleic acid. RESULTS: Of 154 adults randomized into the study, 149 completed the trial (82% female, 94% white, mean age 59.3 ± 6.6 years). There were 27 ARI episodes and 257 days of ARI illness in the meditation group (n = 51), 26 episodes and 241 illness days in the exercise group (n = 47), and 40 episodes and 453 days in the control group (n = 51). Mean global severity was 144 for meditation, 248 for exercise, and 358 for control. Compared with control, global severity was significantly lower for meditation (P = .004). Both global severity and total days of illness (duration) trended toward being lower for the exercise group (P=.16 and P=.032, respectively), as did illness duration for the meditation group (P=.034). Adjusting for covariates using zero-inflated multivariate regression models gave similar results. There were 67 ARI-related days of-work missed in the control group, 32 in the exercise group (P = .041), and 16 in the meditation group (P <.001). Health care visits did not differ significantly. Viruses were identified in 54% of samples from meditation, 42% from exercise, and 54% from control groups. Neutrophil count and interleukin-8 levels were similar among intervention groups. CONCLUSIONS: Training in meditation or exercise may be effective in reducing ARI illness burden.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1370/afm.1376

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [18]18. Kabat-Zinn J. Mindfullness-based interventions in context: Past, present, future. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2003;10:144-156.
  2. [34]34. Hodgues WF, Spielberger CD. An indicant of trait or state anxiety? J Consult Clin Psychol. 1969;33(4):430-434.
  3. [43]43. Brown RL. Assessing specifi c mediational effects in complex theo- retical models. Struct Equ Modeling. 1997;4(2):142-156.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barrett, B., Hayney, M. S., Muller, D., Rakel, D., Ward, A., Obasi, C. N., Brown, R., Zhang, Z., Zgierska, A., Gern, J., West, R., Ewers, T., Barlow, S., Gassman, M., & Coe, C. L.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2012-07-01
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
337-346
ISSN
  • 1544-1709 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-1717
OpenAlex
W2152448084
Cited by
156
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
13.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000427)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K23AA017508)
  • National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025011)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT004313, K24AT006543, F32AT000051, T32AT000051, K23AT000051)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
Keywords
acute respiratory infections, mindfulness meditation, physical activity, disease prevention, older adults, cold, influenza, disease severity, disease duration, absenteeism, nasal wash, neutrophils, interleukin-8, viral infection
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adaptation, Psychological, Common Cold, Exercise Therapy, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Influenza, Human, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Respiratory Tract Infections, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Psychological, Confidence Intervals, Meditation, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review