Cited by 128Epigenetics and DNA MethylationChromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting

DNA methylation: Insights into human evolution

Open access
Hernando-Herraez, Irene, Garcia-Perez, Raquel, Sharp, Andrew J., Marques-Bonet, Tomas·2015·PLOS Genetics

Abstract

A fundamental initiative for evolutionary biologists is to understand the molecular basis underlying phenotypic diversity. A long-standing hypothesis states that species-specific traits may be explained by differences in gene regulation rather than differences at the protein level. Over the past few years, evolutionary studies have shifted from mere sequence comparisons to integrative analyses in which gene regulation is key to understanding species evolution. DNA methylation is an important epigenetic modification involved in the regulation of numerous biological processes. Nevertheless, the evolution of the human methylome and the processes driving such changes are poorly understood. Here, we review the close interplay between Cytosine-phosphate-Guanine (CpG) methylation and the underlying genome sequence, as well as its evolutionary impact. We also summarize the latest advances in the field, revisiting the main literature on human and nonhuman primates. We hope to encourage the scientific community to address the many challenges posed by the field of comparative epigenomics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005661

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Epigenetic adaptive plasticity is considered to affect speciation.

    “Along these lines, epigenetic adaptive plasticity is considered to affect speciation (for review see Hernando-Herraez, Garcia-Perez, Sharp, & Marques-Bonet, 2015).”

    From The applied implications of epigenetics in anxiety, affective and stress-related disorders - A review and synthesis on psychosocial stress, psychotherapy and prevention (2020) · cites this paper as Hernando-Herraez, Garcia-Perez, Sharp, & Marques-Bonet, 2015

    The ‘Inheritance of Epigenetic Variation’ section (page unavailable) reports a proposal that environmentally responsive epigenetic changes could be adaptive and might influence species evolution. It does not specifically say they affect speciation, and it cautions that there is no solid evidence for the proposed adaptive role, particularly in mammals. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hernando-Herraez, I., Garcia-Perez, R., Sharp, A. J., & Marques-Bonet, T.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Sharp, Andrew J.
Venue
PLOS Genetics
Published
2015-12-10
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
e1005661
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W2192647662
Cited by
128
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 16
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • March of Dimes Foundation (6-FY13-92)
  • Generalitat de Catalunya
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (BFU2014-55090-P)
  • National Institutes of Health (1r01da033660-01, 6-FY13-92, DA033660)
  • Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH097018, R01MH097018)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA033660, R01-DA033660)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (HG006696, R01HG006696)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R03HD073731, HD073731)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Keywords
DNA methylation, human evolution, CpG methylation, gene expression regulation, epigenetics, comparative epigenomics, non-human primates, phenotypic diversity
MeSH terms
Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Primates, Genome, Human, CpG Islands, Evolution, Molecular, DNA Methylation, Epigenesis, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review