Cited by 253Stress Responses and CortisolNerve injury and regenerationMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Stress Leads to Contrasting Effects on the Levels of Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor in the Hippocampus and Amygdala

Open access
Lakshminarasimhan, Harini, Chattarji, Sumantra·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Recent findings on stress induced structural plasticity in rodents have identified important differences between the hippocampus and amygdala. The same chronic immobilization stress (CIS, 2 h/day) causes growth of dendrites and spines in the basolateral amygdala (BLA), but dendritic atrophy in hippocampal area CA3. CIS induced morphological changes also differ in their temporal longevity--BLA hypertrophy, unlike CA3 atrophy, persists even after 21 days of stress-free recovery. Furthermore, a single session of acute immobilization stress (AIS, 2 h) leads to a significant increase in spine density 10 days, but not 1 day, later in the BLA. However, little is known about the molecular correlates of the differential effects of chronic and acute stress. Because BDNF is known to be a key regulator of dendritic architecture and spines, we investigated if the levels of BDNF expression reflect the divergent effects of stress on the hippocampus and amygdala. CIS reduces BDNF in area CA3, while it increases it in the BLA of male Wistar rats. CIS-induced increase in BDNF expression lasts for at least 21 days after the end of CIS in the BLA. But CIS-induced decrease in area CA3 BDNF levels, reverses to normal levels within the same period. Finally, BDNF is up regulated in the BLA 1 day after AIS and this increase persists even 10 days later. In contrast, AIS fails to elicit any significant change in area CA3 at either time points. Together, these findings demonstrate that both acute and chronic stress trigger opposite effects on BDNF levels in the BLA versus area CA3, and these divergent changes also follow distinct temporal profiles. These results point to a role for BDNF in stress-induced structural plasticity across both hippocampus and amygdala, two brain areas that have also been implicated in the cognitive and affective symptoms of stress-related psychiatric disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0030481

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-selective activation of BDNF/TrkB signaling in the amygdala leads to maladaptive plasticity resulting in overactivation of this brain region and exacerbated anxiety and fear responses.

    “enhanced BDNF/TrkB signaling in the amygdala leads to maladaptive plasticity resulting in overactivation of this brain region and exacerbated anxiety and fear responses (47, 198–200)”

    From Psychedelics and Other Psychoplastogens for Treating Mental Illness. (2021) · cites this paper as [200]

    The Discussion links elevated BDNF in the basolateral amygdala to increased anxiety and suggests that sustained up-regulation may underlie pathological fear and anxiety after stress. It does not establish that non-selective BDNF/TrkB activation causes amygdala overactivation or these behavioral effects; the Discussion explicitly says the study did not distinguish TrkB from p75NTR signaling. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [29]McEwen BS 1999 Stress and hippocampal plasticity. Annual Review of Neuroscience 22 105 122 10202533

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lakshminarasimhan, H., & Chattarji, S.
Affiliations
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (IN)
Corresponding author
Chattarji, Sumantra
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-01-17
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
e30481
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058006510
Cited by
253
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (GR 0701339 MA)
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • National Centre for Biological Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
brain-derived neurotrophic factor, restraint stress, chronic stress, acute stress, hippocampus, amygdala, basolateral amygdala, CA3, dendritic spine density, dendritic atrophy, structural plasticity, stress recovery, stress-related psychiatric disorders
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Body Weight, Hippocampus, Immunoassay, Male, Restraint, Physical, Stress, Physiological, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Rats, Wistar, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Rats, CA3 Region, Hippocampal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review