Cited by 190Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsTactile and Sensory InteractionsPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Meditation experience predicts introspective accuracy.

Open access
Fox, Kieran C. R., Zakarauskas, Pierre, Dixon, Matt, Ellamil, Melissa, Thompson, Evan, Christoff, Kalina·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

The accuracy of subjective reports, especially those involving introspection of one's own internal processes, remains unclear, and research has demonstrated large individual differences in introspective accuracy. It has been hypothesized that introspective accuracy may be heightened in persons who engage in meditation practices, due to the highly introspective nature of such practices. We undertook a preliminary exploration of this hypothesis, examining introspective accuracy in a cross-section of meditation practitioners (1-15,000 hrs experience). Introspective accuracy was assessed by comparing subjective reports of tactile sensitivity for each of 20 body regions during a 'body-scanning' meditation with averaged, objective measures of tactile sensitivity (mean size of body representation area in primary somatosensory cortex; two-point discrimination threshold) as reported in prior research. Expert meditators showed significantly better introspective accuracy than novices; overall meditation experience also significantly predicted individual introspective accuracy. These results suggest that long-term meditators provide more accurate introspective reports than novices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0045370

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several cross-sectional studies in long-term meditators found moderately sized correspondence between lifetime practice hours and interoceptive abilities and brain structure, and some longitudinal training studies demonstrate dose-dependent effects.

    “Clearly, several cross-sectional studies in long term meditators found moderately sized correspondence between lifetime practice hours and outcome variables such as interospective abilities (Fox et al., 2012), and brain structure (Lazar et al., 2005), and some longitudinal training studies also demonstrate dose-dependent effects (e.g., Carmody and Baer, 2008; Pace et al., 2009; Rosenzweig et al.,”
  • Meditators show greater coherence between objective physiological data and their subjective experience regarding emotional experience and sensitivity of body regions.

    “meditators have been reported to show greater coherence between objective physiological data and their subjective experience—in regard to both emotional experience (Sze et al., 2010) and sensitivity of body regions (Fox et al., 2012).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]Weber EH (1978/1834) E.H. Weber on the Sense of Touch. London: Academic Press. Ross HE, Murray DJ, translators. 260 p.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fox, K. C. R., Zakarauskas, P., Dixon, M., Ellamil, M., Thompson, E., & Christoff, K.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Fox, Kieran C. R.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-09-25
Volume
7
Issue
9
Pages
e45370
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145397616
Cited by
190
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9
FWCI
14.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
introspective accuracy, meditation experience, meditation practitioners, body scanning, tactile sensitivity, representation of the body, primary somatosensory cortex, subjective reports, self-reflection, individual differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Individuality, Learning, Male, Middle Aged, Somatosensory Cortex, Thinking, Time Factors, Touch, Meditation, Touch Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review