Cited by 43Cultural Heritage Materials AnalysisArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesViking Age and Medieval Scandinavia

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 77 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Holy Smoke in Medieval Funerary Rites: Chemical Fingerprints of Frankincense in Southern Belgian Incense Burners

Open access
Baeten, Jan, Deforce, Koen, Challe, Sophie, De Vos, Dirk, Degryse, Patrick·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Frankincense, the oleogum resin from Boswellia sp., has been an early luxury good in both Western and Eastern societies and is particularly used in Christian funerary and liturgical rites. The scant grave goods in late medieval burials comprise laterally perforated pottery vessels which are usually filled with charcoal. They occur in most regions of western Europe and are interpreted as incense burners but have never been investigated with advanced analytical techniques. We herein present chemical and anthracological results on perforated funerary pots from 4 Wallonian sites dating to the 12-14th century AD. Chromatographic and mass spectrometric analysis of lipid extracts of the ancient residues and comparison with extracts from four Boswellia species clearly evidence the presence of degraded frankincense in the former, based on characteristic triterpenoids, viz. boswellic and tirucallic acids, and their myriad dehydrated and oxygenated derivatives. Cembrane-type diterpenoids indicate B. sacra (southern Arabia) and B. serrata (India) as possible botanical origins. Furthermore, traces of juniper and possibly pine tar demonstrate that small amounts of locally available fragrances were mixed with frankincense, most likely to reduce its cost. Additionally, markers of ruminant fats in one sample from a domestic context indicate that this vessel was used for food preparation. Anthracological analysis demonstrates that the charcoal was used as fuel only and that no fragrant wood species were burned. The chars derived from local woody plants and were most likely recovered from domestic fires. Furthermore, vessel recycling is indicated by both contextual and biomarker evidence. The results shed a new light on funerary practices in the Middle Ages and at the same time reveal useful insights into the chemistry of burned frankincense. The discovery of novel biomarkers, namely Δ2-boswellic acids and a series of polyunsaturated and aromatic hydrocarbons, demonstrates the high potential for organic chemical analyses of incense residues.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

GC-MS and anthracological analyses of 26 perforated late medieval funerary pots from four southern Belgian sites provide the first material proof that these vessels were used as censers, with degraded frankincense as the major incense ingredient. The residues also show possible juniper and pine tar admixture, charcoal fuel from local domestic fires, and one domestic vessel used for food preparation.

Key findings

  • Frankincense was identified in residues from Rebecq, Quaregnon and Liège through boswellic and tirucallic acids and their degradation products, including abundant 24-nortriterpenoids and newly identified Δ2-boswellic acids; original cembrane alcohols, tirucallic acids, boswellic and lupeolic acids were only trace.
  • Cembrane-type diterpenoids in samples Q11, L14 and L15 indicate *Boswellia sacra* (southern Arabia) and *B. serrata* (India) as possible botanical origins, while *B. papyrifera* and *B. carterii* are excluded by serratol dominance.
  • Traces of juniper biomarkers (ferruginol, totarol and ketones) in Q11 and Q12, and pine tar markers in R2, R9, Q10, L14 and L15, suggest small amounts of locally available fragrances or earlier vessel uses; sample N13 from a domestic cesspit contained heated ruminant fats and faecal biomarkers, indicating food preparation.
  • Anthracological analysis of 1,854 charcoal fragments from 21 pots yielded at least 11 taxa, dominated by oak, beech or hornbeam; no fragrant wood species were burned, and charcoal was likely recovered from domestic fires, with beech-only assemblages in seven Rebecq pitchers possibly indicating intentionally produced charcoal.

Methods

  • Twenty-six perforated pots from four Wallonian sites (Rebecq, Quaregnon, Namur, Liège, plus Huy in Table 1) dated to the 12th–14th century AD were selected from 192 known Belgian perforated pots; residue analysis was performed on 8 unwashed pots, including surface residues, absorbed ceramic residues and vessel fillings.
  • Lipid extracts were obtained with chloroform:methanol (2:1 v/v), derivatised with BSTFA+1%TMCS and analysed by GC-MS; commercial resins from *B. papyrifera*, *B. carterii*, *B. sacra* and *B. serrata* were extracted and derivatised identically for comparison.
  • Charcoal from 21 pots was identified by manual fracture along three planes and reflected light microscopy (50–500x), with a minimum of 100 fragments per pot where available.

Limitations

  • Stated: species-level identification is very preliminary because only one commercial sample per *Boswellia* species was analysed; the authors call for further research on inter- and intraspecies variability.
  • Stated: many identification criteria that apply to fresh frankincense, such as the ratio of 3-O-acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic acid to 11-keto-β-boswellic acid and percentages of lupane or tirucallane compounds, cannot be used for ancient residues because relative concentrations may change during pyrolysis or burial.
  • Evident: residue analysis covered only 8 of 26 pots and four sites, and the absence of frankincense markers in sample Q10 might be due to extensive washing after excavation, as the authors note.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0113142

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 77 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 88 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 52
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 25
65 of 65
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The perforated funerary pots have not been investigated with advanced analytical techniques.

    “They occur in most regions of western Europe and are interpreted as incense burners but have never been investigated with advanced analytical techniques.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The chemical composition of modern commercial Boswellia resins is representative of the ancient frankincense used in the archaeological pots.

    “Commercial resins from four Boswellia species were analysed for comparison and to verify species-specific criteria.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The species-specific chemical markers used to identify Boswellia species survive degradation and burning in archaeological residues.

    “Cembrane-type diterpenoids indicate B. sacra (southern Arabia) and B. serrata (India) as possible botanical origins.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    All ketones detected in sample N13 arise from acyl lipid pyrolysis.

    “Assuming that all ketones arise from acyl lipid pyrolysis, the original acyl distribution can be reconstructed by mass spectral deconvolution (Figure 7).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Frankincense was expensive and cutting it with more commonly available scents such as flowers, herbs and fragrant woods would have lowered the price.

    “Despite a general emphasis on both spiritual and material purity in this period, frankincense was expensive and cutting with more commonly available scents such as flowers, herbs and fragrant woods would have lowered the price.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Few chemical analyses have been performed on remnants of incense ritual.

    “Yet, few chemical analyses have been performed on remnants of this widespread ritual, which in part may be due to the misconception that incense is a fairly volatile substance leaving no traces after burning.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The perforated pots from southern Belgium have not been investigated in depth by advanced scientific techniques.

    “also constitute an intriguing find category which, despite its widespread occurrence in western Europe, has not been investigated in depth by advanced scientific techniques.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Frankincense contains a substantial amount of non-volatile components which are well preserved in the archaeological record.

    “Nevertheless, certain resins such as frankincense contain a substantial amount of non-volatile components which are well preserved in the archaeological record.”
8 of 8

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Study-site count conflicts with Table 1

    Minor

    The materials section says the 26 selected pots came from four sites, but Table 1 lists pots from five: Rebecq, Quaregnon, Namur, Liège and Huy.

  • Q10 pine tar is described as both trace and abundant

    Minor

    The discussion includes Q10 among samples with traces of pine tar, whereas Table 4 marks its Pinaceae tar signature as +++, rather than tr.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Gauthier C (2008) L’encens dans la liturgie chrétienne du haut Moyen Âge occidentale. In: Verbanck-Piérard A, Massar N, Frère D, editors. Parfums de l’antiquité. La rose et l’encens en Méditerranée. Musée royal de Mariemont, Belgium. pp. 343–349.
  2. Lallemand A (2008) L’encens et le christianisme du Ier au IVe siècle après J.-C. In: Verbanck-Piérard A, Massar N, Frère D, editors. Parfums de l’antiquité. La rose et l’encense en Méditerranée. Musée Royal de Mariemont, Belgium. pp. 335–342.
  3. Sedov A (2007) The port of Qana’ and the incense trade. In: Peacock D, Williams D, editors. Food for the Gods. New light on the ancient incense trade. Oxford: Oxbow books. pp. 71–111.
  4. Allios D (2013) Interprétation et surinterprétation des céramiques médiévales trouvées en contextes funéraires et religieux. Approches historiques et archéologiques. In: Villette M, editors. La céramique dans les contextes rituels. Fouiller et comprendre les gestes des anciens. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes. pp. 189–195.
  5. D Bosquet, 2014, Rebecq: fouilles sur la Grand-Place à l’emplacement de l’église Saint-Géry, Chronique de l’Archéologie Wallonne, 21, 15
  6. M Denis, 2010, Regards sur l’établissement médiéval de Quaregnon (Ht). Bilan des campagnes 2008–2009, Archaeologica Mediaevalis, 33, 55
  7. R Vanmechelen, 2010, Namur: archéologie préventive sous la place Maurice Servais. De la fondation augustéenne à la disparition de la rue du Four, Chronique de l’Archéologie Wallonne, 17, 198
  8. C Péters, 2013, Huy: archéologie et assainissement. Partenariat improbable rue Saint-Hilaire, Chronique de l’Archéologie Wallonne, 20, 160
  9. Paul M (2012) Chemotaxonomic investigations on resins of the frankincense species Boswellia papyrifera, Boswellia serrata and Boswellia sacra, respectively Boswellia carterii [dissertation]. Saarland University, Saarbrücken.
  10. Kimpe K (2003) Chemical analysis of the lipid fraction from ancient ceramics of Sagalassos. [dissertation]. KU Leuven.
  11. Prigent D (1996) Les céramiques funéraires (XIe-XVIIe siècle). In: Galinié H, Zadora-Rio E, editors. Archéologie du cimetière chrétien. Actes du 2e colloque A.R.C.H.E.A. Tours. pp. 215–224.
  12. Heron C, Pollard AM (1988) The analysis of natural resinous materials from Roman Amphoras. In: Proceedings of a Conference on the Application of Scientific Techniques to Archaeology, Oxford.
  13. RD Bleck, 1967, Des Pech von Ruppersdorf, Alt-Thüringen, 9, 204

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 43

Metadata

Authors
Baeten, J., Deforce, K., Challe, S., De Vos, D., & Degryse, P.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Institute of Natural Sciences (BE)
  • Service Public de Wallonie (BE)
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-11-12
Volume
9
Issue
11
Pages
e113142
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156857395
Cited by
43
References
83
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4
FWCI
13.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • KU Leuven
  • Service Public de Wallonie
  • Vlaamse regering
  • Koninklijk Belgisch Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen
  • Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Viking Age and Medieval Scandinavia
Keywords
frankincense, Boswellia, incense burners, funerary practices, medieval burials, Boswellia sacra, Boswellia serrata, triterpenoids, boswellic acids, cembrane diterpenoids, juniper, pine tar, charcoal, Wallonia
MeSH terms
Belgium, Charcoal, Funeral Rites, Plant Extracts, Resins, Plant, Smoke, Triterpenes, Boswellia, History, Medieval, Frankincense

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review