Cited by 134Cardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Digital Photoplethysmography for Assessment of Arterial Stiffness: Repeatability and Comparison with Applanation Tonometry

Open access
von Wowern, Emma, Östling, Gerd, Nilsson, Peter M., Olofsson, Per·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Arterial stiffness is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and can be assessed by applanation tonometry by measuring pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIX) by pressure pulse wave analysis (PWA). As an inexpensive and operator independent alternative, photoelectric plethysmography (PPG) has been introduced with analysis of the digital volume pulse wave (DPA) and its second derivatives of wave reflections. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to investigate the repeatability of arterial stiffness parameters measured by digital pulse wave analysis (DPA) and the associations to applanation tonometry parameters. METHODS AND RESULTS: 112 pregnant and non-pregnant individuals of different ages and genders were examined with SphygmoCor arterial wall tonometry and Meridian DPA finger photoplethysmography. Coefficients of repeatability, Bland-Altman plots, intraclass correlation coefficients and correlations to heart rate (HR) and body height were calculated for DPA variables, and the DPA variables were compared to tonometry variables left ventricular ejection time (LVET), PWV and AIX. No DPA variable showed any systematic measurement error or excellent repeatability, but dicrotic index (DI), dicrotic dilatation index (DDI), cardiac ejection elasticity index (EEI), aging index (AI) and second derivatives of the crude pulse wave curve, b/a and e/a, showed good repeatability. Overall, the correlations to AIX were better than to PWV, with correlations coefficients >0.70 for EEI, AI and b/a. Considering the level of repeatability and the correlations to tonometry, the overall best DPA parameters were EEI, AI and b/a. The two pansystolic time parameters, ejection time compensated (ETc) by DPA and LVET by tonometry, showed a significant but weak correlation. CONCLUSION: For estimation of the LV function, ETc, EEI and b/a are suitable, for large artery stiffness EEI, and for small arteries DI and DDI. The only global parameter, AI, showed a high repeatability and the overall best correlations with AIX and PWV.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0135659

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Over 30 features have been proposed for assessing the stiffness of both large and small arteries from a single PPG.

    “Over 30 features have been proposed for assessing the stiffness of both the large and small arteries from a single PPG”

    From Wearable Photoplethysmography for Cardiovascular Monitoring (2022) · cites this paper as [172]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [19]Gonzales R, Manzo A, Delgado J, Padilla JM, Trenor B, Saiz J. A computer base photoplethysmographic vascular analyser through derivatives. Comp Cardiol 2008; 35: 177– 80
  2. [26]Ozawa T. Pattern of second derivative of volume pulse wave, the relation between non-invasive index of ventricular function and peak acceleration and effect of preloading to peak velocity. Myakuha (Pulse Wave) 1978; 8: 22– 31 (In Japanese).
  3. [32]Bazett HC. An analysis of the time-relations of electrocardiograms. Heart 1920; 7: 35– 70.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
von Wowern, E., Östling, G., Nilsson, P. M., & Olofsson, P.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-08-20
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
e0135659
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1784071036
Cited by
134
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Lunds Universitet
  • Region Skåne
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
arterial stiffness, digital photoplethysmography, applanation tonometry, pulse wave analysis, pulse wave velocity, augmentation index, repeatability, aging index, left ventricular ejection time, pregnancy, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aorta, Arteries, Blood Pressure, Elasticity, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Manometry, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Pulse, Risk Factors, Photoplethysmography, Young Adult, Vascular Stiffness, Pulse Wave Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review