Cited by 79Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesVeterinary Orthopedics and NeurologyVeterinary Equine Medical Research

Housing and demographic risk factors impacting foot and musculoskeletal health in African elephants (Loxodonta africana) and Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in north American zoos

Open access
Miller, Michele A., Hogan, Jennifer N., Meehan, Cheryl L.·2016·PLoS ONE

Abstract

For more than three decades, foot and musculoskeletal conditions have been documented among both Asian [Elephas maximus] and African [Loxodonta africana] elephants in zoos. Although environmental factors have been hypothesized to play a contributing role in the development of foot and musculoskeletal pathology, there is a paucity of evidence-based research assessing risk. We investigated the associations between foot and musculoskeletal health conditions with demographic characteristics, space, flooring, exercise, enrichment, and body condition for elephants housed in North American zoos during 2012. Clinical examinations and medical records were used to assess health indicators and provide scores to quantitate conditions. Using multivariable regression models, associations were found between foot health and age [P value = 0.076; Odds Ratio = 1.018], time spent on hard substrates [P value = 0.022; Odds Ratio = 1.014], space experienced during the night [P value = 0.041; Odds Ratio = 1.008], and percent of time spent in indoor/outdoor exhibits during the day [P value < 0.001; Odds Ratio = 1.003]. Similarly, the main risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders included time on hard substrate [P value = 0.002; Odds Ratio = 1.050] and space experienced in indoor/outdoor exhibits [P value = 0.039; Odds Ratio = 1.037]. These results suggest that facility and management changes that decrease time spent on hard substrates will improve elephant welfare through better foot and musculoskeletal health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0155223

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2016, a series of epidemiological studies of elephants in North American zoos revealed problems associated with ovarian acyclicity, health and musculoskeletal function, stereotypic behaviors, and high body condition scores.

    “In 2016, a series of epidemiological studies of elephants in North American zoos revealed problems associated with ovarian acyclicity (45), health and musculoskeletal function (46), stereotypic behaviors (35), and high body condition scores (47).”
  • At the San Diego Zoo Safari Park, average walking distance for African elephants was estimated at 8.65-9.82 km/day.

    “At the San Diego Zoo Safari Park, Miller, Andrews & Anderson (2012) and Miller, Hogan & Meehan (2016) estimated an average walking distance of 8.65-9.82km/day for African elephants.”

    From Continuing challenges of elephant captivity: the captive environment, health issues, and welfare implications (2024) · cites this paper as Miller, Hogan & Meehan, 2016

    The Materials and Methods section defines mean daily walking distance as a variable, but gives no estimate for African elephants at the San Diego Zoo Safari Park. Searches for the park and the 8.65–9.82 km/day range found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In nature, ~8-12 km/day are normal walking distances for elephants, with much greater distances (up to ~50 km/day) being common.

    “Nevertheless, ~8-12 km/day are normal, with much greater distances (up to ~50 km/day) being common (Wall et al., 2013;Miller, Hogan & Meehan, 2016).”

    From Continuing challenges of elephant captivity: the captive environment, health issues, and welfare implications (2024) · cites this paper as Miller, Hogan & Meehan, 2016

    The Materials and Methods section defines mean daily walking distance for zoo elephants but gives no normal distance for elephants in nature. Searches for 8–12 km/day and 50 km/day found no passage in our copy supporting either figure or the claim that longer distances are common; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [21]von Houwald F, Flach E. Prevalence of chronic foot disease in captive greater one-horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis). EAZWV Sci Meet. 1998; 2: 323– 7.
  2. [23]duPlessis I. Foot health in housed cattle: a review. SA-Anim Sci. 2007; 8: 11– 7.
  3. [26]Spelman L, Yates R, Anikis P, Galuppo L. Regional digital intravenous perfusion in an African elephant (Loxodonta africana). Annual Conference-American Association of Zoo Veterinarians. 2000: 388– 90.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, M. A., Hogan, J. N., & Meehan, C. L.
Affiliations
Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Miller, Michele A.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2016-07-14
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
e0155223
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2461700525
Cited by
79
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10
FWCI
19.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Institute of Museum and Library Services (LG-25-10-0033-10)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Equine › Veterinary Equine Medical Research
Keywords
Loxodonta africana, Asian elephant, foot health, musculoskeletal disorders, zoo animal welfare, risk factors, floor coverings, hard substrate, physical activity, environmental enrichment, body condition, housing space, captive elephants
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Welfare, Animals, Zoo, Elephants, Female, Housing, Animal, Male, Musculoskeletal Diseases, North America, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review