Cited by 61Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Evaluation of demographics and social life events of Asian (Elephas maximus) and African elephants (Loxodonta africana) in north American zoos

Open access
Prado-Oviedo, Natalia A., Bonaparte-Saller, Mary K., Malloy, Elizabeth J., Meehan, Cheryl L., Mench, Joy A., Carlstead, Kathy, Brown, Janine L.·2016·PLoS ONE

Abstract

This study quantified social life events hypothesized to affect the welfare of zoo African and Asian elephants, focusing on animals that were part of a large multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional elephant welfare study in North America. Age was calculated based on recorded birth dates and an age-based account of life event data for each elephant was compiled. These event histories included facility transfers, births and deaths of offspring, and births and deaths of non-offspring herd mates. Each event was evaluated as a total number of events per elephant, lifetime rate of event exposure, and age at first event exposure. These were then compared across three categories: species (African vs. Asian); sex (male vs. female); and origin (imported vs. captive-born). Mean age distributions differed (p<0.05) between the categories: African elephants were 6 years younger than Asian elephants, males were 12 years younger than females, and captive-born elephants were 20 years younger than imported elephants. Overall, the number of transfers ranged from 0 to 10, with a 33% higher age-adjusted transfer rate for imported African than imported Asian elephants, and 37% lower rate for imported females than males (p<0.05). Other differences (p<0.05) included a 96% higher rate of offspring births for captive-born females than those imported from range countries, a 159% higher rate of birthing event exposures for captive-born males than for their imported counterparts, and Asian elephant females being 4 years younger than African females when they produced their first calf. In summarizing demographic and social life events of elephants in North American zoos, we found both qualitative and quantitative differences in the early lives of imported versus captive-born elephants that could have long-term welfare implications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0154750

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As many as 80% of the elephants in North American zoos in 2012 had experienced at least one inter-zoo transfer.

    “As many as 80% of the elephants in North American zoos in 2012 had experienced at least one inter-zoo transfer”

    From Continuing challenges of elephant captivity: the captive environment, health issues, and welfare implications (2024) · cites this paper as Prado-Oviedo et al., 2016

    The Results (Transfers) report that 84% (211/250) of the study elephants experienced a transfer event, and that 94% of imported elephants had a subsequent transfer after importation. But the study counted importation itself as a transfer, and Methods (Subjects) limits the sample to 250 elephants in AZA-accredited zoos—83% of that population in 2012—not all elephants in North American zoos. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the U.S. most captive elephants have experienced at least one inter-zoo transfer, which is associated with stereotypic behaviors.

    “For example, in the U.S. most captive elephants have experienced at least one inter-zoo transfer (111), which is associated with stereotypic behaviors (35).”

    From Comparison of animal welfare assessment tools and methodologies: need for an effective approach for captive elephants in Asia (2024) · cites this paper as [111]

    The Results (Transfers) report that 84% of the 250 elephants studied experienced at least one transfer, and the Discussion describes these as inter-zoo transfers. The Methods (Subjects) limit the sample to AZA-accredited North American zoos, so the finding does not establish the rate for all captive elephants in the U.S. The stereotypic-behavior clause has a different citation in the citing sentence and is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [14]Latham N. Refining the role of stereotypic behaviour in the assessment of welfare: stress, general motor persistence and early environment in the development of abnormal behaviour. Ph.D. thesis, Oxford University, Oxford, UK; 2005.
  2. [21]Moss C. Elephant memories Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1988.
  3. [28]Poole JH, Moss CJ. Elephant mate searching: group dynamics and vocal and olfactory communication. Symp. Zoo. Society of London. 1989; 61: 111– 125.
  4. [31]Lee PC, Moss CN. The social context for learning and behavioural development among wild African elephants In: Mammalian Social Learning (Box H. O. & Gibson K. R., eds). Cambridge Univ.Press, Cambridge; 1999 pp. 102– 125.
  5. [41]Foose TJ. Demographic and genetic models for the management of the okapi (Okapia johnstoni) in captivity. Acta. Zool. Path. Antwerp. 1978; 73: 119– 195.
  6. [42]Glatson AR. Ten years after: The history of the red panda studbook. In Proceedings 5th World Conference on Breeding Endangered Species in Captivity. Dresser BL, Reece, RW, Maruska, EJ (eds.). 1998. Pp. 53–66.
  7. [43]Kleiman DG. World register of golden lion tamarins Leontopithecus rosalia rosalia. Int. Zoo. Yb. 1977; 17: 232.
  8. [46]Clubb R, Mason G. A review of the welfare of zoo elephants in Europe Report commissioned by the RSPCA. Oxford: University of Oxford, Anim. Behav. Res. Grp; 2002.
  9. [59]Olson D, Wiese RJ. State of the North American African elephant population and projections for the future. Zoo Biol. 2000; 9: 311– 320.
  10. [69]Evan KE, Harris S. Adolescence in male African elephants, Loxodonta africana, and the importance of sociality. Anim. Behav. 2008; 76: 779– 787.
  11. [72]Hildebrandt TB, Hermes R, Pratt NC, Fritsch G, Blottner S, Schmitt DL, et al Ultrasonography of the urogenital tract in elephants (loxodonta africana and elephas maximus): an important tool for assessing male reproductive function. Zoo Biol. 2000; 19: 333– 346.
  12. [76]Hildebrandt TB, Goritz F, Hermes R, Reid C, Dehnhard M, Brown JL. Aspects of the reproductive biology and breeding management of Asian and African elephants. Int. Zoo Ybk. 2006; 40: 20– 40.
  13. [82]Schulte B. Social structure and helping behavior in captive elephants. Zoo Biol. 2000; 19: 447– 459.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prado-Oviedo, N. A., Bonaparte-Saller, M. K., Malloy, E. J., Meehan, C. L., Mench, J. A., Carlstead, K., & Brown, J. L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • American University (US)
  • Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute (US)
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2016-07-14
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
e0154750
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2466637481
Cited by
61
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10
FWCI
14.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • American University Research Archive
Funders
Institute of Museum and Library Services (LG-25-10-0033-10)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
Asian elephant, Loxodonta africana, zoo animal welfare, sex differences, age at first reproduction
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Animal Welfare, Animals, Zoo, Elephants, Female, Male, North America, Reproduction, Sex Factors, Social Environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review