Cited by 5Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Restoring striatal WAVE-1 improves maze exploration performance of GluN1 knockdown mice

Open access
Chen, Yuxiao, Milenkovic, Marija, Horsfall, Wendy, Salahpour, Ali, Soderling, Scott H., Ramsey, Amy J.·2018·PLOS ONE

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

NMDA receptors are important for cognition and are implicated in neuropsychiatric disorders. GluN1 knockdown (GluN1KD) mice have reduced NMDA receptor levels, striatal spine density deficits, and cognitive impairments. However, how NMDA depletion leads to these effects is unclear. Since Rho GTPases are known to regulate spine density and cognition, we examined the levels of RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 signaling proteins. Striatal Rac1-pathway components are reduced in GluN1KD mice, with Rac1 and WAVE-1 deficits at 6 and 12 weeks of age. Concurrently, medium spiny neuron (MSN) spine density deficits are present in mice at these ages. To determine whether WAVE-1 deficits were causal or compensatory in relation to these phenotypes, we intercrossed GluN1KD mice with WAVE-1 overexpressing (WAVE-Tg) mice to restore WAVE-1 levels. GluN1KD-WAVE-Tg hybrids showed rescue of striatal WAVE-1 protein levels and MSN spine density, as well as selective behavioral rescue in the Y-maze and 8-arm radial maze tests. GluN1KD-WAVE-Tg mice expressed normalized WAVE-1 protein levels in the hippocampus, yet spine density of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons was not significantly altered. Our data suggest a nuanced role for WAVE-1 effects on cognition and a delineation of specific cognitive domains served by the striatum. Rescue of striatal WAVE-1 and MSN spine density may be significant for goal-directed exploration and associated long-term memory in mice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0199341

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A cross of GluN1KD mice with WAVE1-overexpressing mice rescued striatal WAVE1 protein levels and the MSN spine density, as well as behaviors in the Y-maze and 8-arm radial maze tests.

    “A cross of GluN1KD mice with WAVE1-overexpressing mice rescued striatal WAVE1 protein levels and the MSN spine density, as well as behaviors in the Y-maze and 8-arm radial maze tests62.”

    From The WAVE complex in developmental and adulthood brain disorders (2025) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Results report that intercrossing restored striatal WAVE-1 levels, increased MSN spine density, and improved Y-maze performance. The 8-arm radial maze result was narrower: working-memory errors improved only partially, while the other reported measure remained impaired. Describing the maze behaviors as rescued without that qualification overstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • GluN1 knockdown mice have reduced NMDA receptor levels, striatal spine density deficits, and cognitive impairments.

    “GluN1 knockdown (GluN1KD) mice have reduced NMDA receptor levels, striatal spine density deficits, and cognitive impairments.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. [1]Paoletti P, Bellone C, Zhou Q. NMDA receptor subunit diversity: impact on receptor properties, synaptic plasticity and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013; 14: 383– 400. 10.1038/nrn3504 23686171 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Yuan H, Low C-M, Moody OA, Jenkins A, Traynelis SF. Ionotropic GABA and Glutamate Receptor Mutations and Human Neurologic Diseases. Mol Pharmacol. 2015; 88: 203– 217. 10.1124/mol.115.097998 25904555 PMC4468639 · DOI
  3. [4]Dzirasa K, Ramsey AJ, Takahashi DY, Stapleton J, Potes JM, Williams JK, et al Hyperdopaminergia and NMDA Receptor Hypofunction Disrupt Neural Phase Signaling. J Neurosci. 2009; 29: 8215– 8224. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1773-09.2009 19553461 PMC2731697 · DOI
  4. [5]Gandal MJ, Anderson RL, Billingslea EN, Carlson GC, Roberts TPL, Siegel SJ. Mice with reduced NMDA receptor expression: more consistent with autism than schizophrenia? Genes Brain Behav. 2012; 11: 740– 750. 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2012.00816.x 22726567 PMC3808979 · DOI
  5. [6]Wesseling H, Guest PC, Lee C-M, Wong EH, Rahmoune H, Bahn S. Integrative proteomic analysis of the NMDA NR1 knockdown mouse model reveals effects on central and peripheral pathways associated with schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders. Mol Autism. 2014; 5: 38 10.1186/2040-2392-5-38 25061506 PMC4109791 · DOI
  6. [7]Ramsey AJ, Milenkovic M, Oliveira AF, Escobedo-Lozoya Y, Seshadri S, Salahpour A, et al Impaired NMDA receptor transmission alters striatal synapses and DISC1 protein in an age-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011; 108: 5795– 5800. 10.1073/pnas.1012621108 21436042 PMC3078375 · DOI
  7. [8]Milenkovic M, Mielnik CA, Ramsey AJ. NMDA receptor-deficient mice display sexual dimorphism in the onset and severity of behavioural abnormalities. Genes Brain Behav. 2014; 13: 850– 862. 10.1111/gbb.12183 25327402 · DOI
  8. [9]Hayashi-Takagi A, Takaki M, Graziane N, Seshadri S, Murdoch H, Dunlop AJ, et al Disrupted-in-Schizophrenia 1 (DISC1) regulates spines of the glutamate synapse via Rac1. Nat Neurosci. 2010; 13: 327– 332. 10.1038/nn.2487 20139976 PMC2846623 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [10]Brandon NJ, Sawa A. Linking neurodevelopmental and synaptic theories of mental illness through DISC1. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011; 12: 707– 722. 10.1038/nrn3120 22095064 PMC3954824 · DOI
  10. [11]Moser M-B, Trommald M, Andersen P. An increase in dendritic spine density on hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells following spatial learning in adult rats suggests the formation of new synapses. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1994; 91: 12673– 12675. 7809099 PMC45501
  11. [12]Sanders J, Cowansage K, Baumgartel K, Mayford M. Elimination of Dendritic Spines with Long-Term Memory Is Specific to Active Circuits. J Neurosci. 2012; 32: 12570– 12578. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1131-12.2012 22956846 PMC3486631 · DOI
  12. [13]Dillon C, Goda Y. The actin cytoskeleton: integrating form and function at the synapse. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005; 28: 25– 55. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135757 16029114 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [14]Saneyoshi T, Hayashi Y. The Ca2+ and Rho GTPase signaling pathways underlying activity-dependent actin remodeling at dendritic spines. Cytoskeleton. 2012; 69: 545– 554. 10.1002/cm.21037 22566410 · DOI
  14. [16]Soderling SH, Langeberg LK, Soderling JA, Davee SM, Simerly R, Raber J, et al Loss of WAVE-1 causes sensorimotor retardation and reduced learning and memory in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003; 100: 1723– 1728. 10.1073/pnas.0438033100 12578964 PMC149900 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [17]Dash PK, Orsi SA, Moody M, Moore AN. A role for hippocampal Rho–ROCK pathway in long-term spatial memory. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004; 322: 893– 898. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.08.004 15336547 · DOI
  16. [18]Haditsch U, Leone DP, Farinelli M, Chrostek-Grashoff A, Brakebusch C, Mansuy IM, et al A central role for the small GTPase Rac1 in hippocampal plasticity and spatial learning and memory. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2009; 41: 409– 419. 10.1016/j.mcn.2009.04.005 19394428 PMC2705331 · DOI
  17. [19]Govek EE, Newey SE, Van Aelst L. The role of the Rho GTPases in neuronal development. Genes Dev. 2005; 19: 1– 49. 10.1101/gad.1256405 15630019 · DOI
  18. [20]Bennett M. Positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia: the NMDA receptor hypofunction hypothesis, neuregulin/ErbB4 and synapse regression. Aust N Z J PSYCHIATRY. 2009; 43: 711– 721. 10.1080/00048670903001943 19629792 · DOI
  19. [21]Silva AJ, Simpson EM, Takahashi JS, Lipp H-P, Nakanishi S, Wehner JM, et al Mutant mice and neuroscience: recommendations concerning genetic background. Neuron. 1997; 19: 755– 759. 9354323
  20. [22]Sossey-Alaoui K, Head K, Nowak N, Cowell JK. Genomic organization and expression profile of the human and mouse WAVE gene family. Mamm Genome. 2003; 14: 314– 322. 10.1007/s00335-002-2247-7 12856283 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [23]Seabold GK, Daunais JB, Rau A, Grant KA, Alvarez VA. DiOLISTIC Labeling of Neurons from Rodent and Non-human Primate Brain Slices. J Vis Exp. 2010; e2081 10.3791/2081 20644510 PMC3156079 · DOI
  22. [24]Ruddy RM, Chen Y, Milenkovic M, Ramsey AJ. Differential effects of NMDA receptor antagonism on spine density: NMDA Receptor Antagonism on Spine Density. Synapse. 2015; 69: 52– 56. 10.1002/syn.21784 25220437 PMC5700749 · DOI
  23. [25]Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat METHODS. 2012; 9: 671– 675. 10.1038/nmeth.2089 22930834 PMC5554542 · DOI · Paper page
  24. [26]Meijering E, Jacob M, Sarria J-C, Steiner P, Hirling H, Unser M. Design and validation of a tool for neurite tracing and analysis in fluorescence microscopy images. Cytometry A. 2004; 58: 167– 176. 10.1002/cyto.a.20022 15057970 · DOI
  25. [27]Mandillo S, Tucci V, Holter SM, Meziane H, Banchaabouchi MA, Kallnik M, et al Reliability, robustness, and reproducibility in mouse behavioral phenotyping: a cross-laboratory study. Physiol Genomics. 2008; 34: 243– 255. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.90207.2008 18505770 PMC2519962 · DOI
  26. [28]Ben Abdallah NM-B, Fuss J, Trusel M, Galsworthy MJ, Bobsin K, Colacicco G, et al The puzzle box as a simple and efficient behavioral test for exploring impairments of general cognition and executive functions in mouse models of schizophrenia. Exp Neurol. 2011; 227: 42– 52. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.09.008 20851119 · DOI
  27. [29]Choleris E, Thomas AW, Kavaliers M, Prato FS. A detailed ethological analysis of the mouse open field test: effects of diazepam, chlordiazepoxide and an extremely low frequency pulsed magnetic field. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2001; 25: 235– 260. 11378179
  28. [31]Mielnik CA, Horsfall W, Ramsey AJ. Diazepam improves aspects of social behaviour and neuron activation in NMDA receptor-deficient mice. Genes Brain Behav. 2014; 13: 592– 602. 10.1111/gbb.12155 25040071 PMC5271919 · DOI
  29. [33]Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41: 1149– 1160. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 19897823 · DOI · Paper page
  30. [34]Eden S, Rohatgi R, Podtelejnikov AV, Mann M, Kirschner MW. Mechanism of regulation of WAVE1-induced actin nucleation by Rac1 and Nck. Nature. 2002; 418: 790– 793. 10.1038/nature00859 12181570 · DOI · Paper page
  31. [35]Bompard G, Caron E. Regulation of WASP/WAVE proteins: making a long story short. J Cell Biol. 2004; 166: 957– 962. 10.1083/jcb.200403127 15452139 PMC2172026 · DOI
  32. [36]Soderling SH, Guire ES, Kaech S, White J, Zhang F, Schutz K, et al A WAVE-1 and WRP Signaling Complex Regulates Spine Density, Synaptic Plasticity, and Memory. J Neurosci. 2007; 27: 355– 365. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3209-06.2006 17215396 PMC3740594 · DOI · Paper page
  33. [37]Luo LQ, Hensch TK, Ackerman L, Barbel S, Jan LY, Jan YN. Differential effects of the Rac GTPase on Purkinje cell axons and dendritic trunks and spines. Nature. 1996; 379: 837– 840. 10.1038/379837a0 8587609 · DOI
  34. [38]Tashiro A, Minden A, Yuste R. Regulation of dendritic spine morphology by the Rho family of small GTPases: Antagonistic roles of Rac and Rho. Cereb CORTEX. 2000; 10: 927– 938. 10.1093/cercor/10.10.927 11007543 · DOI
  35. [39]McHugh TJ, Jones MW, Quinn JJ, Balthasar N, Coppari R, Elmquist JK, et al Dentate gyrus NMDA receptors mediate rapid pattern separation in the hippocampal network. SCIENCE. 2007; 317: 94– 99. 10.1126/science.1140263 17556551 · DOI · Paper page
  36. [40]Neves G, Cooke SF, Bliss TVP. Synaptic plasticity, memory and the hippocampus: a neural network approach to causality. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008; 9: 65– 75. 10.1038/nrn2303 18094707 · DOI
  37. [42]Kim Y, Sung JY, Ceglia I, Lee K-W, Ahn J-H, Halford JM, et al Phosphorylation of WAVE1 regulates actin polymerization and dendritic spine morphology. Nature. 2006; 442: 814– 817. 10.1038/nature04976 16862120 · DOI · Paper page
  38. [43]Kim IH, Racz B, Wang H, Burianek L, Weinberg R, Yasuda R, et al Disruption of Arp2/3 Results in Asymmetric Structural Plasticity of Dendritic Spines and Progressive Synaptic and Behavioral Abnormalities. J Neurosci. 2013; 33: 6081– 6092. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0035-13.2013 23554489 PMC3656411 · DOI · Paper page
  39. [44]Hardingham GE, Do KQ. Linking early-life NMDAR hypofunction and oxidative stress in schizophrenia pathogenesis. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016; 17: 125 10.1038/nrn.2015.19 26763624 · DOI · Paper page
  40. [45]Roberts AC, Díez-García J, Rodriguiz RM, López IP, Luján R, Martínez-Turrillas R, et al Downregulation of NR3A-Containing NMDARs Is Required for Synapse Maturation and Memory Consolidation. Neuron. 2009; 63: 342– 356. 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.016 19679074 PMC3448958 · DOI
  41. [48]Floresco SB, Seamans JK, Phillips AG. Selective roles for hippocampal, prefrontal cortical, and ventral striatal circuits in radial-arm maze tasks with or without a delay. J Neurosci. 1997; 17: 1880– 1890. 9030646 PMC6573377
  42. [49]Dean O, Bush AI, Berk M, Copolov DL, van den Buuse M. Glutathione depletion in the brain disrupts short-term spatial memory in the Y-maze in rats and mice. Behav Brain Res. 2009; 198: 258– 262. 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.11.017 19061918 · DOI
  43. [50]Shu S-Y, Jiang G, Zeng Q-Y, Wang B, Li H, Ma L, et al The Marginal Division of the Striatum and Hippocampus Has Different Role and Mechanism in Learning and Memory. Mol Neurobiol. 2015; 51: 827– 839. 10.1007/s12035-014-8891-6 25274077 PMC4359289 · DOI
  44. [51]Choy KHC, de Visser Y, Nichols NR, van den Buuse M. Combined neonatal stress and young‐adult glucocorticoid stimulation in rats reduce BDNF expression in hippocampus: Effects on learning and memory. Hippocampus. 2008; 18: 655– 667. 10.1002/hipo.20425 18398848 · DOI
  45. [52]Morris RGM, Steele RJ, Bell JE, Martin SJ. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, learning and memory: chronic intraventricular infusion of the NMDA receptor antagonist D-AP5 interacts directly with the neural mechanisms of spatial learning. Eur J Neurosci. 2013; 37: 700– 717. 10.1111/ejn.12086 23311352 · DOI
  46. [53]Maurice T, Hiramatsu M, Itoh J, Kameyama T, Hasegawa T, Nabeshima T. Behavioral evidence for a modulating role of sigma-ligands in memory processes. I. Attenuation of dizocilpine (MK-801)-induced amnesia. Brain Res. 1994; 647: 44– 56. 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91397-8 8069704 · DOI
  47. [54]Buzsáki G, Moser EI. Memory, navigation and theta rhythm in the hippocampal-entorhinal system. Nat Neurosci. 2013; 16: 130– 138. 10.1038/nn.3304 23354386 PMC4079500 · DOI · Paper page
  48. [55]Sung JY, Engmann O, Teylan MA, Nairn AC, Greengard P, Kim Y. WAVE1 controls neuronal activity-induced mitochondrial distribution in dendritic spines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105: 3112– 3116. 10.1073/pnas.0712180105 18287015 PMC2268593 · DOI · Paper page
  49. [56]Ceglia I, Kim Y, Nairn AC, Greengard P. Signaling pathways controlling the phosphorylation state of WAVE1, a regulator of actin polymerization. J Neurochem. 2010; 114: 182– 190. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06743.x 20403076 PMC2945298 · DOI · Paper page
  50. [57]Conrad CD, Galea LA, Kuroda Y, McEwen BS. Chronic stress impairs rat spatial memory on the Y maze, and this effect is blocked by tianeptine treatment. Behav Neurosci. 1996; 110: 1321 8986335
  51. [59]Lu W, Bushong EA, Shih TP, Ellisman MH, Nicoll RA. The Cell-Autonomous Role of Excitatory Synaptic Transmission in the Regulation of Neuronal Structure and Function. Neuron. 2013; 78: 433– 439. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.02.030 23664612 PMC3666354 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, Y., Milenkovic, M., Horsfall, W., Salahpour, A., Soderling, S. H., & Ramsey, A. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Ramsey, Amy J.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2018-10-23
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
e0199341
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950120388
Cited by
5
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2018-06409)
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH R01 MH103374)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
NMDA receptor, striatum, medium spiny neurons, dendritic spine density, Rho GTPases, Rac1 signaling, cognitive impairment, spatial learning and memory, Y-maze, radial maze, hippocampus, gene rescue
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cognition, Crosses, Genetic, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Hippocampus, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neuropeptides, Phenotype, Signal Transduction, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Mice, Knockout, Maze Learning, Transgenes, rho GTP-Binding Proteins, rac1 GTP-Binding Protein, Dendritic Spines, Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome Protein Family, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review