Cited by 81Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Laboratory Testing for Lupus Anticoagulants: A Review of Issues Affecting Results

Tripodi, Armando·2007·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

Background Lupus anticoagulants (LA) are a heterogeneous class of immunoglobulins. Persistent LA positivity is a risk factor for the occurrence and recurrence of venous/arterial thromboembolism and/or pregnancy morbidity and qualifies the patient for anticoagulation therapy. The laboratory diagnosis for LA that is used for crucial decision-making about the optimal duration of the therapy rests entirely on diagnostic criteria. These criteria are based on the prolongation of phospholipid-dependent tests not corrected upon mixing patient and normal plasmas, with confirmation provided by the evidence that the anticoagulant is directed against proteins bound to negatively charged phospholipids. Aims This article reviews issues related to the diagnosis of LA, including the effect of preanalytical variables, choice of tests, results interpretation of screening, mixing and confirmation procedures, patients to be investigated, and transmission of results. Unresolved issues and future direction for research on laboratory diagnosis are also discussed. Methods Search of PubMed with the key term "lupus anticoagulant" plus articles and unpublished data known to the author. Results and conclusions The preanalytical variables (i.e., plasma preparation and storage before analysis) as well as the diagnostic steps to detect LA present potential problems that undermine the process of making a correct diagnosis. A truly specific test for LA detection is badly needed, but its development may requi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1373/clinchem.2007.089524

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tripodi, A.
Affiliations
University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Tripodi, Armando
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2007-09-01
Volume
53
Issue
9
Pages
1629-1635
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W2123780397
Cited by
81
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
lupus anticoagulant, laboratory diagnosis, pre-analytical variables, plasma storage, mixing studies, anticoagulant screening, thromboembolism, pregnancy morbidity, anticoagulation, diagnostic criteria
MeSH terms
Blood Coagulation Tests, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic, Thrombosis, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Antiphospholipid Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review