Laboratory Testing for Lupus Anticoagulants: A Review of Issues Affecting Results
Abstract
Background Lupus anticoagulants (LA) are a heterogeneous class of immunoglobulins. Persistent LA positivity is a risk factor for the occurrence and recurrence of venous/arterial thromboembolism and/or pregnancy morbidity and qualifies the patient for anticoagulation therapy. The laboratory diagnosis for LA that is used for crucial decision-making about the optimal duration of the therapy rests entirely on diagnostic criteria. These criteria are based on the prolongation of phospholipid-dependent tests not corrected upon mixing patient and normal plasmas, with confirmation provided by the evidence that the anticoagulant is directed against proteins bound to negatively charged phospholipids. Aims This article reviews issues related to the diagnosis of LA, including the effect of preanalytical variables, choice of tests, results interpretation of screening, mixing and confirmation procedures, patients to be investigated, and transmission of results. Unresolved issues and future direction for research on laboratory diagnosis are also discussed. Methods Search of PubMed with the key term "lupus anticoagulant" plus articles and unpublished data known to the author. Results and conclusions The preanalytical variables (i.e., plasma preparation and storage before analysis) as well as the diagnostic steps to detect LA present potential problems that undermine the process of making a correct diagnosis. A truly specific test for LA detection is badly needed, but its development may requi…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ICA was considered the most robust approach to express the LA mixing test results.
“The ICA was considered the most robust approach to express the LA mixing test results [26]”
From Comparison of different algorithms for lupus anticoagulant detection: a single-center experience (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Cites
MIYAKIS, S., LOCKSHIN, M. D., ATSUMI, T., BRANCH, D. W., BREY, R. L., CERVERA, R., DERKSEN, R. H. W. M., DE GROOT, P. G., KOIKE, T., MERONI, P. L., et al. (2006) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01753.x · Cited by 7,203 · see citing works
Brandt, J. T., Triplett, D. A., Alving, B., & Scharrer, I. (1995) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1649901 · Cited by 993 · see citing works
Galli, M., Luciani, D., Bertolini, G., & Barbui, T. (2003) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2002-02-0441 · Cited by 974 · see citing works
Galli, M., Luciani, D., Bertolini, G., & Barbui, T. (2003) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2002-11-3334 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Brandt, J. T., Barna, L. K., & Triplett, D. A. (1995) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1649988 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Kelsey, P. R., Stevenson, K. J., & Poller, L. (1984) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1661166 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Biasiolo, A., Rampazzo, P., Brocco, T., & Pengo, V. (1999) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1055/s-0037-1614453 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Tripodi, A., Mancuso, M. E., Chantarangkul, V., Clerici, M., Bader, R., Meroni, P. L., Santagostino, E., & Mannucci, P. M. (2005) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2005.054312 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lockshin, M. D., Kim, M., Laskin, C. A., Guerra, M., Branch, D. W., Merrill, J., Petri, M., Porter, T. F., Sammaritano, L., Stephenson, M. D., et al. (2012) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.34402 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
DE LAAT, B., PENGO, V., PABINGER, I., MUSIAL, J., VOSKUYL, A. E., BULTINK, I. E. M., RUFFATTI, A., ROZMAN, B., KVEDER, T., DE MOERLOOSE, P., et al. (2009) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03588.x · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Recent Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Detection of Lupus Anticoagulants
Moore, G. (2014) · Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis · doi:10.1055/s-0033-1364185 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
“5,22,28 35 A persistent problem has been that different laboratories adopt a variety of modi fi cations with their locally employed thromboplastin, such as the dilutions employed for screen and con fi rm tests, resulting in signi fi cant variability in diagnostic performance.”
BackgroundInfluentialLaboratory diagnosis of the antiphospholipid syndrome: a plethora of obstacles to overcome
Devreese, K., & Hoylaerts, M. F. (2009) · European Journal Of Haematology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01243.x · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Lupus Anticoagulant Testing: Performance and Practices by North American Clinical Laboratories
Dembitzer, F. R., Ledford Kraemer, M. R., Meijer, P., & Peerschke, E. I. B. (2010) · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1309/ajcp4spplg5xvixf · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Cohen, H., Mackie, I. J., & Devreese, K. M. J. (2019) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/jth.14560 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Current Controversies in Lupus Anticoagulant Detection
Moore, G. (2016) · Antibodies · doi:10.3390/antib5040022 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Tripodi, A., Chantarangkul, V., Cini, M., Devreese, K., Dlott, J. S., Giacomello, R., Gray, E., Legnani, C., Martinuzzo, M. E., Pradella, P., et al. (2017) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/jth.13678 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationLupus anticoagulant detection: out of control?
Moore, G. W., Brown, K. L., Bromidge, E. S., Drew, A. J., & Ledford‐Kraemer, M. R. (2013) · International Journal of Laboratory Hematology · doi:10.1111/ijlh.12006 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Pradella, P., Azzarini, G., Santarossa, L., Caberlotto, L., Bardin, C., Poz, A., D’Aurizio, F., & Giacomello, R. (2013) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2012-0382 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
ABOUD, M., MOREL‐KOPP, M. ‐., WARD, C., & COYLE, L. (2010) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03946.x · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Moore, G. W., & Kumano, O. (2020) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/jth.14669 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Comparison of different algorithms for lupus anticoagulant detection: a single-center experience
Apipongrat, D., Lamool, R., Arnutti, P., Ruangpratheep, C., & Chantkran, W. (2024) · Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102333 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tripodi, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Milan (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Tripodi, Armando
- ORCID
- Tripodi, Armando
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-09-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1629-1635
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2123780397
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Clinical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Keywords
- lupus anticoagulant, laboratory diagnosis, pre-analytical variables, plasma storage, mixing studies, anticoagulant screening, thromboembolism, pregnancy morbidity, anticoagulation, diagnostic criteria
- MeSH terms
- Blood Coagulation Tests, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic, Thrombosis, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Antiphospholipid Syndrome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review