Cited by 93Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesTreatment of Major Depression

Functional connectivity between the amygdala and prefrontal cortex in medication-naive individuals with major depressive disorder

Open access
Kong, Lingtao, Chen, Kaiyuan, Tang, Yanqing, Wu, Feng, Driesen, Naomi, Womer, Fay, Fan, Guoguang, Ren, Ling +5 more·2013·Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Convergent evidence suggests dysfunction within the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and amygdala, important components of a neural system that subserves emotional processing, in individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD). Abnormalities in this system in the left hemisphere and during processing of negative emotional stimuli are especially implicated. In this study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate amygdala-PFC functional connectivity during emotional face processing in medication-naive individuals with MDD. METHODS: Individuals with MDD and healthy controls underwent fMRI scanning while processing 3 types of emotional face stimuli. We compared the strength of functional connectivity from the amygdala between the MDD and control groups. RESULTS: Our study included 28 individuals with MDD and 30 controls. Decreased amygdala-left rostral PFC (rPFC) functional connectivity was observed in the MDD group compared with controls for the fear condition (p < 0.05, corrected). No significant differences were found in amygdala connectivity to any cerebral regions between the MDD and control groups for the happy or neutral conditions. LIMITATIONS: All participants with MDD were experiencing acute episodes, therefore the findings could not be generalized to the entire MDD population. CONCLUSION: Medication-naive individuals with MDD showed decreased amygdala-left rPFC functional connectivity in response to negative emotional stimuli, suggesting that abnormalities in amygdala-left rPFC neural circuitry responses to negative emotional stimuli might play an important role in the pathophysiology of MDD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1503/jpn.120117

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MDD is linked to reduced cortico-limbic functional connectivity (e.g., mPFC↔amygdala) when presented with negative cues.

    “MDD has been linked to reduced cortico-limbic functional connectivity (e.g., mPFC↔amygdala) when presented with negative cues [175-178].”

    From Prefrontal cortex and depression (2022) · cites this paper as [177]

    The Results report reduced amygdala–left rostral PFC connectivity in participants with MDD during fearful-face processing, supporting the claim about negative cues. The paper identifies the region as rostral PFC, not explicitly as mPFC, so the example is more anatomically specific than the source states. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [54]54. Victor TA, Furey ML, Fromm SJ, et al. Relationship between amygdala responses to masked faces and mood state and treat- ment in major depressive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010;67: 1128-38.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kong, L., Chen, K., Tang, Y., Wu, F., Driesen, N., Womer, F., Fan, G., Ren, L., Jiang, W., Cao, Y., Blumberg, H., Xu, K., & Wang, F.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience
Published
2013-11-01
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
417-422
ISSN
1180-4882 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127127037
Cited by
93
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81101012, 81271499, 81071099)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH086621, 01MH086621)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
major depressive disorder, amygdala, prefrontal cortex, functional connectivity, rostral prefrontal cortex, emotional face processing, negative emotional stimuli, fear, drug-naive patients, neural circuits, emotional processing
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Brain Mapping, Major Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Pathways, Photic Stimulation, Case-Control Studies, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review