The DOI matches its Crossref record; 308 of the 310 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): a review of the literature
Abstract
This article is a review of work published in various journals on the topics of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) between January 2000 and May 2006. A total of 313 articles from 79 journals are reviewed. The article intends to serve three goals. First, it will be useful to researchers who are interested in understanding what kinds of questions have been addressed in the area of ERP. Second, the article will be a useful resource for searching for research topics. Third, it will serve as a comprehensive bibliography of the articles published during the period. The literature is analysed under six major themes and nine sub-themes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Review of literature conducted by Moon [22] and Addo-Tenkorang and Helo [1] mention that one of the most cited critical success factors in the implementation of ERP systems is user participation and involvement.”
From Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Implementation: A Case for User Participation (2013) · cites this paper as Moon [22]
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Hunton, J. E., McEwen, R. A., & Wier, B. (2002) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/jis.2002.16.1.31 · Cited by 94
RetractedEnterprise resource planning: Implementation procedures and critical success factors
Umble, E. J., Haft, R. R., & Umble, M. M. (2003) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00547-7 · Cited by 1,607
Critical factors for successful implementation of enterprise systems
Nah, F. F., Lau, J. L., & Kuang, J. (2001) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/14637150110392782 · Cited by 1,393
The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective
Hong, K.-K., & Kim, Y. (2002) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00134-3 · Cited by 1,194
Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change
Robey, D., Ross, J. W., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2002) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045713 · Cited by 1,023
Enterprise resource planning: A taxonomy of critical factors
Al‐Mashari, M., Al‐Mudimigh, A. S., & Zairi, M. (2002) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00554-4 · Cited by 974
An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment
Amoako-Gyampah, K., & Salam, A. F. (2004) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.010 · Cited by 922
Investment in Enterprise Resource Planning: Business Impact and Productivity Measures
Hitt, L. M., Wu, D. J., & Zhou, X. (2002) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045716 · Cited by 877 · cited 1×
“The companies which have implemented ERP systems and are relatively satisfied with their operations are now considering the extension of the functionalities provided by the original ERP systems.”
BackgroundLearning from adopters' experiences with ERP: problems encountered and success achieved
Markus, M. L., Axline, S., Petrie, D., & Tanis, C. (2000) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1080/02683960010008944 · Cited by 748
Akkermans, H., & van Helden, K. (2002) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000418 · Cited by 743
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Review of ERP Research: A Future Agenda for Accounting Information Systems
Grabski, S. V., Leech, S. A., & Schmidt, P. J. (2011) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/jis.2011.25.1.37 · Cited by 440
A multi-project model of key factors affecting organizational benefits from enterprise systems
(2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.5555/2017458.2017464 · Cited by 259
A Multi-Project Model of Key Factors Affecting Organizational Benefits from Enterprise Systems1
Seddon, P. B., Calvert, C., & Yang, S. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20721429 · Cited by 211
Hsu, P., Yen, H. R., & Chung, J.-C. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.06.009 · Cited by 185
Enterprise resource planning adoption and satisfaction determinants
Costa, C. J., Ferreira, E., Bento, F., & Aparicio, M. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.090 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Moon, Y. B.
- Corresponding author
- Moon, Young B.
- ORCID
- Moon, Young B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development
- Publisher
- Inderscience Publishers
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 235
- ISSN
- 1468-4330 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-8127
- OpenAlex
- W2151627395
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 310
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 30.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development (publishedVersion)
- Syracuse University Libraries (Syracuse University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Enterprise Management and Information Systems
- Keywords
- enterprise resource planning, research topics, ERP adoption, ERP implementation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
