Cited by 136Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

The mystery of sleep function: Current perspectives and future directions

Frank, Marcos G.·2006·Reviews in the Neurosciences

Abstract

The function of sleep is one of the most persistent and perplexing mysteries in biology. Many theories have been proposed to explain why we sleep, but most account for only a portion of sleep behavior and very few enjoy strong experimental support. A critical review of current findings leads to the following conclusions. Sleep is for the brain rather than the body, and the neural process most impacted by sleep is cognition. Sleep may influence cognition in many ways, including the removal of a toxic byproduct of wakefulness, or the restoration of neural substrates needed for mental processes. The evidence for these possibilities, however, is weak or equivocal. On the other hand, converging lines of evidence support the hypothesis that sleep promotes brain plasticity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/revneuro.2006.17.4.375

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sleep has a restorative effect on the immune system, the endocrine system, facilitates recovery of the nervous system and metabolic cost of the waking state, and has an integral role in learning, memory and synaptic plasticity.

    “Sleep has been shown to have a restorative effect on the immune system, the endocrine system, facilitate the recovery of the nervous system and metabolic cost of the waking state and has an integral role in learning, memory and synaptic plasticity, all of which can impact both athletic recovery and performance.”

    From Sleep and Nutrition Interactions: Implications for Athletes (2019) · cites this paper as [19]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frank, M. G.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Frank, Marcos G.
Venue
Reviews in the Neurosciences
Published
2006-01
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
375-92
ISSN
  • 0334-1763 (ISSN-L)
  • 2191-0200
OpenAlex
W2320456118
Cited by
136
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reviews in the Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Institute of Mental Health (5-R01-MH607568)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
sleep function, sleep theory, cognition, neuroplasticity, sleep-dependent memory consolidation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Energy Metabolism, Humans, Learning, Memory, Neuronal Plasticity, Regeneration, Sleep, Sleep Deprivation, Long-Term Potentiation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review