Cited by 11Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringRetinal Development and DisordersPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research

Minimizing iridium oxide electrodes for high visual acuity subretinal stimulation

Open access
Damle, Samir, Carleton, Maya, Kapogianis, Theodoros, Arya, Shaurya, Cavichini-Corderio, Melina, Freeman, William R., Lo, Yu-Hwa, Oesch, Nicholas W.·2021·eNeuro

Abstract

Vision loss from diseases of the outer retina, such as age-related macular degeneration, is among the leading causes of irreversible blindness in the world today. The goal of retinal prosthetics is to replace the photo-sensing function of photoreceptors lost in these diseases with optoelectronic hardware to electrically stimulate patterns of retinal activity corresponding to vision. To enable high-resolution retinal prosthetics, the scale of stimulating electrodes must be significantly decreased from current designs; however, this reduces the amount of stimulating current that can be delivered. The efficacy of subretinal stimulation at electrode sizes suitable for high visual acuity retinal prosthesis are not well understood, particularly within the safe charge injection limits of electrode materials. Here, we measure retinal ganglion cell (RGC) responses in a mouse model of blindness to evaluate the stimulation efficacy of 10, 20, and 30 μm diameter iridium oxide electrodes within the electrode charge injection limits, focusing on measures of charge threshold and dynamic range. Stimulation thresholds were lower for smaller electrodes, but larger electrodes could elicit a greater dynamic range of spikes and recruited more ganglion cells within charge injection limits. These findings suggest a practical lower limit for planar electrode size and indicate strategies for maximizing stimulation thresholds and dynamic range.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/eneuro.0506-20.2021

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smaller electrodes have higher charge density stimulation threshold and lower dynamic range, as shown in explanted retinas.

    “Smaller electrodes have higher charge density stimulation threshold and lower dynamic range, as shown in explanted ratinas [160,161].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Damle, S., Carleton, M., Kapogianis, T., Arya, S., Cavichini-Corderio, M., Freeman, W. R., Lo, Y.-H., & Oesch, N. W.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Oesch, Nicholas W.
Venue
eNeuro
Published
2021-11
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
ENEURO.0506-20.2021
ISSN
2373-2822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3212539261
Cited by
11
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eNeuro (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
NIH (EY029259)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
Keywords
iridium oxide electrodes, subretinal stimulation, retinal prosthesis, retinal ganglion cells, stimulation threshold, dynamic range, electrode size, charge injection limit, age-related macular degeneration, visual acuity
MeSH terms
Animals, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Iridium, Microelectrodes, Retina, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Visual Acuity, Mice, Visual Prosthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review