Cited by 65Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringRetinal Development and DisordersCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors

Characteristics of prosthetic vision in rats with subretinal flat and pillar electrode arrays

Open access
Ho, Elton, Lei, Xin, Flores, Thomas, Lorach, Henri, Huang, Tiffany, Galambos, Ludwig, Kamins, Theodore, Harris, James +2 more·2019·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Retinal prostheses aim to restore sight by electrically stimulating the surviving retinal neurons. In clinical trials of the current retinal implants, prosthetic visual acuity does not exceed 20/550. However, to provide meaningful restoration of central vision in patients blinded by age-related macular degeneration (AMD), prosthetic acuity should be at least 20/200, necessitating a pixel pitch of about 50 µm or lower. With such small pixels, stimulation thresholds are high due to limited penetration of electric field into tissue. Here, we address this challenge with our latest photovoltaic arrays and evaluate their performance in vivo. APPROACH: We fabricated photovoltaic arrays with 55 and 40 µm pixels (a) in flat geometry, and (b) with active electrodes on 10 µm tall pillars. The arrays were implanted subretinally into rats with degenerate retina. Stimulation thresholds and grating acuity were evaluated using measurements of the visually evoked potentials (VEP). MAIN RESULTS: With 55 µm pixels, we measured grating acuity of 48 ± 11 µm, which matches the linear pixel pitch of the hexagonal array. This geometrically corresponds to a visual acuity of 20/192 in a human eye, matching the threshold of legal blindness in the US (20/200). With pillar electrodes, the irradiance threshold was nearly halved, and duration threshold reduced by more than three-fold, compared to flat pixels. With 40 µm pixels, VEP was too low for reliable measurements of the grating acuity, even with pillar electrodes. SIGNIFICANCE: While being helpful for treating a complete loss of sight, current prosthetic technologies are insufficient for addressing the leading cause of untreatable visual impairment-AMD. Subretinal photovoltaic arrays may provide sufficient visual acuity for restoration of central vision in patients blinded by AMD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2552/ab34b3

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A common approach is to use bipolar stimulation through two close electrodes, as shown in retinal, optic nerve, and thalamic prostheses.

    “A common approach is to use bipolar stimulation through two close electrodes, as shown in retinal [36,143,144], optic nerve [75], and thalamic prostheses [81].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ho, E., Lei, X., Flores, T., Lorach, H., Huang, T., Galambos, L., Kamins, T., Harris, J., Mathieson, K., & Palanker, D.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Ho, Elton
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2019-10-30
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
066027
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2964084936
Cited by
65
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01-EY-018608)
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-15-1-0009)
  • Stanford Institute of Neuroscience
  • Research to Prevent Blindness
  • National Science Foundation (ECCS-1542152)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Keywords
retinal prosthesis, grating acuity, stimulation threshold, irradiance threshold, duration thresholds, age-related macular degeneration, visual evoked potentials, electric field penetration, pixel pitch, rat model
MeSH terms
Animals, Electrodes, Implanted, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Retina, Retinal Degeneration, Prosthesis Implantation, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats, Visual Prosthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review