Cited by 146Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringRetinal Development and DisordersPain Management and Treatment

Selectivity of direct and network-mediated stimulation of the retinal ganglion cells with epi-, sub- and intraretinal electrodes

Open access
Boinagrov, David, Pangratz-Fuehrer, Susanne, Goetz, Georges, Palanker, Daniel·2014·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Intra-retinal placement of stimulating electrodes can provide close and stable proximity to target neurons. We assessed improvement in stimulation thresholds and selectivity of the direct and network-mediated retinal stimulation with intraretinal electrodes, compared to epiretinal and subretinal placements. APPROACH: Stimulation thresholds of the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in wild-type rat retina were measured using the patch-clamp technique. Direct and network-mediated responses were discriminated using various synaptic blockers. MAIN RESULTS: Three types of RGC responses were identified: short latency (SL, τ < 5 ms) originating in RGCs, medium latency (ML, 3 < τ < 70 ms) originating in the inner nuclear layer and long latency (LL, τ > 40 ms) originating in photoreceptors. Cathodic epiretinal stimulation exhibited the lowest threshold for direct RGC response and the highest direct selectivity (network/direct thresholds ratio), exceeding a factor of 3 with pulse durations below 0.5 ms. For network-mediated stimulation, the lowest threshold was obtained with anodic pulses in OPL position, and its network selectivity (direct/network thresholds ratio) increased with pulse duration, exceeding a factor of 4 at 10 ms. Latency of all three types of responses decreased with increasing strength of the stimulus. SIGNIFICANCE: These results define the optimal range of pulse durations, pulse polarities and electrode placement for the retinal prostheses aiming at direct or network-mediated stimulation of RGCs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/11/2/026008

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The device position and the characteristics of the electrical pulses determine which cell population is predominantly activated.

    “The device position (epiretinal, subretinal or suprachoroidal) and the characteristics of the electrical pulses (such as duration and waveform) determine which cell population is predominantly activated [28,29].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gefen R Nano-retina project status Conference presentation on 7th Biennial World Congress on Artificial Vision Detroit, MI 2012

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boinagrov, D., Pangratz-Fuehrer, S., Goetz, G., & Palanker, D.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Boinagrov, David
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2014-03-10
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
026008
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2058723867
Cited by
146
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Chongqing University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY018608)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
retinal ganglion cells, retinal prosthesis, epiretinal stimulation, subretinal stimulation, stimulation selectivity, stimulation threshold, pulse duration, pulse polarity, inner plexiform layer, photoreceptors, rat retina
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Male, Microelectrodes, Nerve Net, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review