Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microglia Play an Active Role in Obesity-Associated Cognitive Decline

Cope, Elise C., LaMarca, Elizabeth A., Monari, Patrick K., Olson, Lyra B., Martinez, Susana, Zych, Anna D., Katchur, Nicole J., Gould, Elizabeth·2018·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Obesity affects >600 million people worldwide, a staggering number that appears to be on the rise. One of the lesser known consequences of obesity is its deleterious effects on cognition, which have been well documented across many cognitive domains and age groups. To investigate the cellular mechanisms that underlie obesity-associated cognitive decline, we used diet-induced obesity in male mice and found memory impairments along with reductions in dendritic spines, sites of excitatory synapses, increases in the activation of microglia, the brain's resident immune cells, and increases in synaptic profiles within microglia, in the hippocampus, a brain region linked to cognition. We found that partial knockdown of the receptor for fractalkine, a chemokine that can serve as a “find me” cue for microglia, prevented microglial activation and cognitive decline induced by obesity. Furthermore, we found that pharmacological inhibition of microglial activation in obese mice was associated with prevention of both dendritic spine loss and cognitive degradation. Finally, we observed that pharmacological blockade of microglial phagocytosis lessened obesity-associated cognitive decline. These findings suggest that microglia play an active role in obesity-associated cognitive decline by phagocytosis of synapses that are important for optimal function. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Obesity in humans correlates with reduced cognitive function. To investigate the cellular mechanisms underlying this, we used diet-induced obesity in mice and found impaired performance on cognitive tests of hippocampal function. These deficits were accompanied by reduced numbers of dendritic spines, increased microglial activation, and increased synaptic profiles within microglia. Inhibition of microglial activation by transgenic and pharmacological methods prevented cognitive decline and dendritic spine loss in obese mice. Moreover, pharmacological inhibition of the phagocytic activity of microglia was also sufficient to prevent cognitive degradation. This work suggests that microglia may be responsible for obesity-associated cognitive decline and dendritic spine loss.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0789-18.2018

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. 10.1126/science.1227901 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19991001)58:1<33::AID-JNR5>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1242/dmm.006239 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90010-1 · DOI
  6. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6413-10.2011 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00473.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1073/pnas.1511593112 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238082.13860.50 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/nature10907 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.01.014 · DOI
  12. 10.1089/neu.1998.15.1037 · DOI
  13. Franklin KB , Paxinos G (2008) The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. New York: Elsevier Science.
  14. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.06.003 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/laban1005-39 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.comppsych.2006.05.001 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/S0197-0186(03)00146-3 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.08.023 · DOI
  19. 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10896 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.nlm.2012.04.005 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.280.5368.1371 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/cercor/bhs151 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/oby.2009.273 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.03.003 · DOI
  25. 10.1128/MCB.20.11.4106-4114.2000 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1186/1756-6606-4-27 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/nyas.12805 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/cne.22317 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/nri.2017.125 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1038/oby.2008.296 · DOI
  31. 10.1161/01.STR.0000251791.64910.cd · DOI
  32. 10.1093/qjmed/hcl085 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.07.024 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/brain/awn109 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1038/nprot.2006.258 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.tics.2015.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.2174/187152709788680689 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/glia.20207 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.037 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2042-13.2013 · DOI
  41. 10.1001/archneurol.2010.191 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/hbm.20870 · DOI
  43. 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14833 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/s10571-011-9791-1 · DOI
  45. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3667-11.2011 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1371/journal.pone.0121971 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1002/glia.20338 · DOI
  48. 10.1186/s40478-016-0374-8 · DOI
  49. 10.1371/journal.pone.0138317 · DOI
  50. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1619-13.2014 · DOI
  51. 10.4103/1673-5374.206633 · DOI
  52. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00920.x · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.06.024 · DOI
  54. 10.1172/JCI59660 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-08-02580.2001 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1016/j.nlm.2013.06.012 · DOI
  57. 10.1007/978-1-61779-430-8_27 · DOI
  58. 10.1038/nm.4154 · DOI
  59. 10.1186/1471-2377-5-23 · DOI
  60. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3688-11.2011 · DOI
  61. 10.4103/1673-5374.156979 · DOI
  62. Yagle, 2005, Evaluation of 18F-annexin V as a PET imaging agent in an animal model of apoptosis, J Nucl Med, 46, 658
  63. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.07.024 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1071 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.2147/NDT.S73836 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cope, E. C., LaMarca, E. A., Monari, P. K., Olson, L. B., Martinez, S., Zych, A. D., Katchur, N. J., & Gould, E.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2018-09-10
Volume
38
Issue
41
Pages
8889-8904
ISSN
  • 0270-6474
  • 1529-2401
Cited by
219
References
16
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review