Cited by 624Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchChemokine receptors and signaling

CX3CR1 deficiency leads to impairment of hippocampal cognitive function and synaptic plasticity

Open access
Rogers, Justin T., Morganti, Josh M., Bachstetter, Adam D., Hudson, Charles E., Peters, Melinda M., Grimmig, Bethany A., Weeber, Edwin J., Bickford, Paula C. +1 more·2011·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The protective/neurotoxic role of fractalkine (CX3CL1) and its receptor CX3C chemokine receptor 1 (CX3CR1) signaling in neurodegenerative disease is an intricate and highly debated research topic and it is becoming even more complicated as new studies reveal discordant results. It appears that the CX3CL1/CX3CR1 axis plays a direct role in neurodegeneration and/or neuroprotection depending on the CNS insult. However, all the above studies focused on the role of CX3CL1/CX3CR1 signaling in pathological conditions, ignoring the relevance of CX3CL1/CX3CR1 signaling under physiological conditions. No approach to date has been taken to decipher the significance of defects in CX3CL1/CX3CR1 signaling in physiological condition. In the present study we used CX3CR1⁻/⁻, CX3CR1⁺/⁻, and wild-type mice to investigate the physiological role of CX3CR1 receptor in cognition and synaptic plasticity. Our results demonstrate for the first time that mice lacking the CX3CR1 receptor show contextual fear conditioning and Morris water maze deficits. CX3CR1 deficiency also affects motor learning. Importantly, mice lacking the receptor have a significant impairment in long-term potentiation (LTP). Infusion with IL-1β receptor antagonist significantly reversed the deficit in cognitive function and impairment in LTP. Our results reveal that under physiological conditions, disruption in CX3CL1 signaling will lead to impairment in cognitive function and synaptic plasticity via increased action of IL-1β.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3667-11.2011

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence suggests CX3CR1 plays an important role in the regulation of synaptic function, with CX3CR1 deficiency resulting in cognitive and LTP impairments indicative of altered synaptic plasticity.

    “evidence suggests it plays an important role in the regulation of synaptic function, with CX3CR1 deficiency resulting in cognitive and LTP impairments indicative of altered synaptic plasticity [42, 43].”
  • Activation of the fractalkine receptor (CX3CR1) in microglial cells increases synaptic strength; deficiency in this receptor results in reduced hippocampal synaptic plasticity.

    “The activation of the fractalkine receptor (CX3CR1) in microglial cells, increases synaptic strength. However, deficiency in this receptor results in a reduced hippocampal synaptic plasticity (Rogers et al., 2011; Clark et al., 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogers, J. T., Morganti, J. M., Bachstetter, A. D., Hudson, C. E., Peters, M. M., Grimmig, B. A., Weeber, E. J., Bickford, P. C., & Gemma, C.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2011-11-09
Volume
31
Issue
45
Pages
16241-16250
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2099005297
Cited by
624
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 14
FWCI
16.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG030128, AG04418, P01AG004418)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Chemokine receptors and signaling
Keywords
CX3CR1, fractalkine, hippocampus, cognitive function, synaptic plasticity, long-term potentiation, contextual fear conditioning, Morris water maze, motor learning, IL-1β, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, neuroprotection, neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Biophysics, Bromodeoxyuridine, Calcium-Binding Proteins, Cerebellum, Cognition Disorders, Conditioning, Psychological, Disease Models, Animal, Electric Stimulation, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Exploratory Behavior, Fear, Gene Expression Regulation, Hippocampus, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Microfilament Proteins, Motor Activity, Cytokines, Microglia, Long-Term Potentiation, Mice, Knockout, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Maze Learning, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Receptors, Interleukin-8A, Rotarod Performance Test, Mice, Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein, Neurogenesis, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review