Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Gating Mutation in Ryanodine Receptor Type 2 Rescues Phenotypes of Alzheimer’s Disease Mouse Models by Upregulating Neuronal Autophagy

Zhang, Hua, Knight, Caitlynn, Chen, S.R. Wayne, Bezprozvanny, Ilya·2023·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

It is well established that ryanodine receptors (RyanRs) are overactive in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and it has been suggested that inhibition of RyanR is potentially beneficial for AD treatment. In the present study, we explored a potential connection between basal RyanR activity and autophagy in neurons. Autophagy plays an important role in clearing damaged organelles and long-lived protein aggregates, and autophagy dysregulation occurs in both AD patients and AD animal models. Autophagy is known to be regulated by intracellular calcium (Ca 2+) signals, and our results indicated that basal RyanR2 activity in hippocampal neurons inhibited autophagy through activation of calcineurin and the resulting inhibition of the AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase)–ULK1 (unc-51-like autophagy-activating kinase 1) pathway. Thus, we hypothesized that increased basal RyanR2 activity in AD may lead to the inhibition of neuronal autophagy and accumulation of β-amyloid. To test this hypothesis, we took advantage of the RyanR2-E4872Q knock-in mouse model (EQ) in which basal RyanR2 activity is reduced because of shortened channel open time. We discovered that crossing EQ mice with the APPKI and APPPS1 mouse models of AD (both males and females) rescued amyloid accumulation and LTP impairment in these mice. Our results revealed that reduced basal activity of RyanR2-EQ channels disinhibited the autophagic pathway and led to increased amyloid clearance in these models. These data indicated a potential pathogenic outcome of RyanR2 overactivation in AD and also provided additional targets for therapeutic intervention in AD. Basal activity of ryanodine receptors controls neuronal autophagy and contributes to development of the AD phenotype. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT It is well established that neuronal autophagy is impaired in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Our results suggest that supranormal calcium (Ca 2+) release from endoplasmic reticulum contributes to the inhibition of autophagy in AD and that reduction in basal activity of type 2 ryanodine receptors disinhibits the neuronal autophagic pathway and leads to increased amyloid clearance in AD models. Our findings directly link neuronal Ca 2+dysregulation with autophagy dysfunction in AD and point to additional targets for therapeutic intervention.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1820-22.2022

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 82

  1. 10.1111/nyas.14305 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118020 · DOI
  3. 10.1083/jcb.201206003 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.tins.2008.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0800-08.2008 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1093/brain/awv236 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.09.088 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.03.011 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nn.3304 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.007 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1093/jnen/63.8.821 · DOI
  12. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2047-09.2009 · DOI
  13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0052056 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/s12035-021-02487-7 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/nm.3440 · DOI
  16. 10.3389/fncel.2016.00116 · DOI
  17. 10.1152/jn.1993.69.4.1150 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nn.2709 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.ceca.2011.04.001 · DOI
  20. 10.4161/auto.7.12.17909 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1002/jnr.22445 · DOI
  22. 10.1126/science.1196371 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.3389/fncel.2018.00435 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/15548627.2019.1596489 · DOI
  25. 10.4103/1673-5374.262584 · DOI
  26. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-08-04794.1994 · DOI
  27. 10.1083/jcb.128.5.893 · DOI
  28. 10.1074/jbc.270.11.6186 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/cddis.2013.533 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0306-4522(99)00042-1 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1074/jbc.M110.114207 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.09.007 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/cns.13216 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s00401-017-1733-7 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1091/mbc.E07-08-0823 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/s41598-019-56675-6 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.008 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.050 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00203 · DOI
  40. 10.4161/chan.27471 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/jnr.24936 · DOI
  42. 10.18632/aging.103305 · DOI
  43. 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000134 · DOI
  44. 10.3390/cells9020311 · DOI
  45. 10.3390/cells9122655 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1038/ncb3114 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/s41598-021-86822-x · DOI
  48. 10.1093/jnen/64.2.113 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0875-12.2012 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.04.008 · DOI
  51. 10.2217/nmt.15.36 · DOI
  52. 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001730 · DOI
  53. 10.3390/biomedicines9010005 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.11.014 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.4161/auto.5.5.8823 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1007/s00401-011-0896-x · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1126/science.1174447 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1529/biophysj.108.128728 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/emboj.2012.32 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03332.x · DOI
  61. Stallings, 2018, Pin1 mediates Aβ42-induced dendritic spine loss, Sci Signal, 11, aap8734, 10.1126/scisignal.aap8734 · DOI
  62. 10.1073/pnas.0804672105 · DOI
  63. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0739-06.2006 · DOI
  64. 10.1186/s13195-020-00649-8 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.3390/cells10082125 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136011 · DOI
  67. 10.1074/jbc.M606736200 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.12.034 · DOI
  69. 10.3233/JAD-150065 · DOI
  70. 10.1007/s00401-020-02234-7 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.08.042 · DOI
  72. 10.3389/fncel.2018.00089 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.03.011 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.09.019 · DOI
  75. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4456-09.2010 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1093/brain/awq341 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108169 · DOI
  78. 10.1093/hmg/ddv056 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1083/jcb.200505082 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1554-10.2010 · DOI
  81. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1188-16.2016 · DOI
  82. 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101464 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, H., Knight, C., Chen, S. R. W., & Bezprozvanny, I.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2023-01-10
Volume
43
Issue
8
Pages
1441-1454
ISSN
  • 0270-6474
  • 1529-2401
Cited by
32
References
13
Language
en
Funders
  • National Institute of Aging (R56AG071310, R01AG055577)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PJT-152914)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review