The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Gating Mutation in Ryanodine Receptor Type 2 Rescues Phenotypes of Alzheimer’s Disease Mouse Models by Upregulating Neuronal Autophagy
Abstract
It is well established that ryanodine receptors (RyanRs) are overactive in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and it has been suggested that inhibition of RyanR is potentially beneficial for AD treatment. In the present study, we explored a potential connection between basal RyanR activity and autophagy in neurons. Autophagy plays an important role in clearing damaged organelles and long-lived protein aggregates, and autophagy dysregulation occurs in both AD patients and AD animal models. Autophagy is known to be regulated by intracellular calcium (Ca 2+) signals, and our results indicated that basal RyanR2 activity in hippocampal neurons inhibited autophagy through activation of calcineurin and the resulting inhibition of the AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase)–ULK1 (unc-51-like autophagy-activating kinase 1) pathway. Thus, we hypothesized that increased basal RyanR2 activity in AD may lead to the inhibition of neuronal autophagy and accumulation of β-amyloid. To test this hypothesis, we took advantage of the RyanR2-E4872Q knock-in mouse model (EQ) in which basal RyanR2 activity is reduced because of shortened channel open time. We discovered that crossing EQ mice with the APPKI and APPPS1 mouse models of AD (both males and females) rescued amyloid accumulation and LTP impairment in these mice. Our results revealed that reduced basal activity of RyanR2-EQ channels disinhibited the autophagic pathway and led to increased amyloid clearance in these models. These data indicated a potential pathogenic outcome of RyanR2 overactivation in AD and also provided additional targets for therapeutic intervention in AD. Basal activity of ryanodine receptors controls neuronal autophagy and contributes to development of the AD phenotype. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT It is well established that neuronal autophagy is impaired in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Our results suggest that supranormal calcium (Ca 2+) release from endoplasmic reticulum contributes to the inhibition of autophagy in AD and that reduction in basal activity of type 2 ryanodine receptors disinhibits the neuronal autophagic pathway and leads to increased amyloid clearance in AD models. Our findings directly link neuronal Ca 2+dysregulation with autophagy dysfunction in AD and point to additional targets for therapeutic intervention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The presence of yellow puncta suggests autophagic flux is being blocked by inhibition of lysosome fusion with the autophagosome74–77, and can be induced by the addition of autophagy blocker, Bafilomycin A1 (BAFA1) (Supplementary Fig. 8k).”
From GRAMD1B is a regulator of lipid homeostasis, autophagic flux and phosphorylated tau (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes.
Braak, H., & Braak, E. (1991) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00308809 · Cited by 16,123
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1
Klionsky, D. J., Abdel-Aziz, A. K., Abdelfatah, S., Abdellatif, M., Abdoli, A., Abel, S., Abeliovich, H., Abildgaard, M. H., Abudu, Y. P., Acevedo-Arozena, A., et al. (2021) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280 · Cited by 2,897
Self-citationFang, E. F., Hou, Y., Palikaras, K., Adriaanse, B. A., Kerr, J. S., Yang, B., Lautrup, S., Hasan-Olive, M. M., Caponio, D., Dan, X., et al. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0332-9 · Cited by 1,740
Single App knock-in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease
Saito, T., Matsuba, Y., Mihira, N., Takano, J., Nilsson, P., Itohara, S., Iwata, N., & Saido, T. C. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3697 · Cited by 1,366
Aβ42‐driven cerebral amyloidosis in transgenic mice reveals early and robust pathology
Radde, R., Bolmont, T., Kaeser, S. A., Coomaraswamy, J., Lindau, D., Stoltze, L., Calhoun, M. E., Jäggi, F., Wolburg, H., Gengler, S., et al. (2006) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400784 · Cited by 986
Lee, J.-H., Yang, D.-S., Goulbourne, C. N., Im, E., Stavrides, P., Pensalfini, A., Chan, H., Bouchet-Marquis, C., Bleiwas, C., Berg, M. J., et al. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01084-8 · Cited by 638
Leeman, D. S., Hebestreit, K., Ruetz, T., Webb, A. E., McKay, A., Pollina, E. A., Dulken, B. W., Zhao, X., Yeo, R. W., Ho, T. T., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aag3048 · Cited by 528
The role of CREB signaling in Alzheimer’s disease and other cognitive disorders
Saura, C. A., & Valero, J. (2011) · revneuro · doi:10.1515/rns.2011.018 · Cited by 312
Mitophagy in Alzheimer’s disease: Molecular defects and therapeutic approaches
Mary, A., Eysert, F., Checler, F., & Chami, M. (2023) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01631-6 · Cited by 244
Lauritzen, I., Pardossi-Piquard, R., Bourgeois, A., Pagnotta, S., Biferi, M.-G., Barkats, M., Lacor, P., Klein, W., Bauer, C., & Checler, F. (2016) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1577-6 · Cited by 219
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 82
- 10.1111/nyas.14305 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118020 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.201206003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tins.2008.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0800-08.2008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/brain/awv236 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.09.088 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.03.011 · DOI
- 10.1038/nn.3304 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/jnen/63.8.821 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2047-09.2009 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0052056 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12035-021-02487-7 · DOI
- 10.1038/nm.3440 · DOI
- 10.3389/fncel.2016.00116 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1993.69.4.1150 · DOI
- 10.1038/nn.2709 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ceca.2011.04.001 · DOI
- 10.4161/auto.7.12.17909 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/jnr.22445 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1196371 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fncel.2018.00435 · DOI
- 10.1080/15548627.2019.1596489 · DOI
- 10.4103/1673-5374.262584 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-08-04794.1994 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.128.5.893 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.270.11.6186 · DOI
- 10.1038/cddis.2013.533 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0306-4522(99)00042-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M110.114207 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.09.007 · DOI
- 10.1111/cns.13216 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00401-017-1733-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1091/mbc.E07-08-0823 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-019-56675-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.050 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00203 · DOI
- 10.4161/chan.27471 · DOI
- 10.1002/jnr.24936 · DOI
- 10.18632/aging.103305 · DOI
- 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000134 · DOI
- 10.3390/cells9020311 · DOI
- 10.3390/cells9122655 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ncb3114 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-021-86822-x · DOI
- 10.1093/jnen/64.2.113 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0875-12.2012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.04.008 · DOI
- 10.2217/nmt.15.36 · DOI
- 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001730 · DOI
- 10.3390/biomedicines9010005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.11.014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4161/auto.5.5.8823 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00401-011-0896-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1174447 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1529/biophysj.108.128728 · DOI
- 10.1038/emboj.2012.32 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03332.x · DOI
- Stallings, 2018, Pin1 mediates Aβ42-induced dendritic spine loss, Sci Signal, 11, aap8734, 10.1126/scisignal.aap8734 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0804672105 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0739-06.2006 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13195-020-00649-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/cells10082125 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136011 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M606736200 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.12.034 · DOI
- 10.3233/JAD-150065 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00401-020-02234-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.08.042 · DOI
- 10.3389/fncel.2018.00089 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.03.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.09.019 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4456-09.2010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/brain/awq341 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108169 · DOI
- 10.1093/hmg/ddv056 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1083/jcb.200505082 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1554-10.2010 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1188-16.2016 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101464 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Targeting autophagy in Alzheimer’s disease: Animal models and mechanisms
Zhang, X.-W., 澳门大学中华医药研究院中药质量研究国家重点实验室, 澳. 凼. 9., State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, I. O. C. M. S., Zhu, X.-X., Tang, D.-S., Lu, J.-H., 佛山大学广东省动物分子设计与精准育种重点实验室, 广., & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Design and Precise Breeding, G. E. T. C. O. G. P. (2023) · Zoological Research · doi:10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2023.294 · Cited by 77
Webber, E. K., Fivaz, M., Stutzmann, G. E., & Griffioen, G. (2023) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13065 · Cited by 50
GRAMD1B is a regulator of lipid homeostasis, autophagic flux and phosphorylated tau
Acosta Ingram, D., Turkes, E., Kim, T. Y., Vo, S., Sweeney, N., Bonte, M.-A., Rutherford, R., Julian, D. L., Pan, M., Marsh, J., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58585-w · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, H., Knight, C., Chen, S. R. W., & Bezprozvanny, I.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2023-01-10
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1441-1454
- ISSN
- 0270-6474
- 1529-2401
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 13
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Institute of Aging (R56AG071310, R01AG055577)
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PJT-152914)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review