Cited by 241Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCellular transport and secretionDown syndrome and intellectual disability research

App Gene Dosage Modulates Endosomal Abnormalities of Alzheimer's Disease in a Segmental Trisomy 16 Mouse Model of Down Syndrome

Open access
Cataldo, Anne M., Petanceska, Suzana, Peterhoff, Corrinne M., Terio, Nicole B., Epstein, Charles J., Villar, Angela, Carlson, Elaine J., Staufenbiel, Matthias +1 more·2003·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Altered neuronal endocytosis is the earliest known pathology in sporadic Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Down syndrome (DS) brain and has been linked to increased Aβ production. Here, we show that a genetic model of DS (trisomy 21), the segmental trisomy 16 mouse Ts65Dn, develops enlarged neuronal early endosomes, increased immunoreactivity for markers of endosome fusion (rab5, early endosomal antigen 1, and rabaptin5), and endosome recycling (rab4) similar to those in AD and DS individuals. These abnormalities are most prominent in neurons of the basal forebrain, which later develop aging-related atrophy and degenerative changes, as in AD and DS. We also show that App, one of the triplicated genes in Ts65Dn mice and human DS, is critical to the development of these endocytic abnormalities. Selectively deleting one copy of App or a small portion of the chromosome 16 segment containing App from Ts65Dn mice eliminated the endosomal phenotype. Overexpressing App at high levels in mice did not alter early endosomes, implying that one or more additional genes on the triplicated segment of chromosome 16 are also required for the Ts65Dn endosomal phenotype. These results identify an essential role for App gene triplication in causing AD-related endosomal abnormalities and further establish the pathogenic significance of endosomal dysfunction in AD.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In the Ts65Dn segmental trisomy 16 mouse model of Down syndrome, triplication of App is necessary for AD-like neuronal early endosomal abnormalities, but not sufficient because APP overexpression alone did not reproduce them. The findings support endosomal dysfunction as an early pathogenic event relevant to Alzheimer’s disease and Down syndrome.

Key findings

  • Ts65Dn mice developed enlarged rab5-positive early endosomes and increased immunoreactivity for endosome fusion markers rab5, rabaptin5, and EEA1, plus recycling marker rab4, most prominently in basal forebrain neurons; abnormalities appeared as early as 2 months and increased in number of affected neurons with age.
  • Western blot analysis showed a 2.5-fold increase in rab4 levels in Ts65Dn mouse brains compared with 2N controls (p < 0.0006; n = 4).
  • Removing one copy of App in Ts65Dn-App+/+/− mice or using Ts1Cje mice lacking the App-to-Sod1 trisomic segment eliminated the endosomal phenotype in MSN, NBM, neocortex, and hippocampus, with rab4 levels similar to controls.
  • Transgenic mice overexpressing mutant human APP—twofold Swedish plus London mutations or sevenfold Swedish mutation—had normal-appearing rab5-positive early endosomes and normal patterns of EEA1, rab4, and rabaptin5, implying one or more additional genes on the triplicated MMU16 segment are required.

Methods

  • Used segmental trisomy mice: Ts65Dn (n = 6), Ts1Cje (n = 4), and Ts65Dn-App+/+/− (n = 6), plus transgenic APP mice expressing Swedish (n = 6) or Swedish plus London mutations, and APP plus presenilin 1 mice (n = 6); controls were age-matched 2N littermates.
  • Brain tissue from medial septal nucleus, nucleus basalis magnocellularis, hippocampus, neocortex, basal ganglia, and cerebellum was examined by immunocytochemistry for rab5, rab4, rabaptin5, and EEA1; Western blotting was used for rab4; thioflavin S was used to detect β-amyloid deposition.
  • Aging effects were assessed in Ts65Dn and 2N controls at 6, 12, and 18 months of age.

Limitations

  • The paper does not state a limitations section. Evident from the text: group sizes were small (n = 4–6 per group), and much of the endosomal assessment was qualitative immunocytochemistry, with only rab4 quantified by Western blot.
  • The paper states that Ts65Dn mice do not deposit β-amyloid and, even at 24 months, do not exhibit extracellular β-amyloid plaques or neurofibrillary tangles, so late-stage AD pathology is not modeled.
  • The paper states that increased App dosage is necessary but not sufficient for the endosomal phenotype and that one or more additional genes on the trisomic segment are required; candidate genes such as Sod1, BACE2, S100β, and ApoE are discussed but not experimentally tested here.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.23-17-06788.2003

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

8 of 22 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingcitation

    These same populations of basal forebrain neurons typically develop less severe atrophy in Ts1Cje and Ts65Dn-App+/+/− mice or older ages compared with age-matched Ts65Dn mice.

    “These same populations of basal forebrain neurons typically develop less severe atrophy in the Ts1Cje (Sago et al., 1998) and Ts65Dn-App ϩ/ϩ/Ϫ mice (our unpublished observation) or older ages compared with that occurring in age-matched Ts65Dn mice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sago et al., 1998 source

      The Discussion reports that at six months, basal forebrain cholinergic neurons were normal in number and size in Ts1Cje mice, unlike the loss and size decrease seen in Ts65Dn mice. This supports the comparison for Ts1Cje at that age, but the paper does not establish that Ts1Cje neurons develop atrophy or address the comparison at older ages. The sentence attributes the Ts65Dn-App observation to unpublished work, not to Sago et al. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Ts65Dn mice do not deposit β-amyloid.

    “Unlike what occurs in human disorders, however, Ts65Dn mice do not deposit ␤-amyloid.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Holtzman et al., 1996 source
  • Premisecitation

    Basal forebrain neurons in Ts65Dn mice later develop aging-related atrophy and degenerative changes, as in AD and DS.

    “Ts65Dn mice also exhibit age-related atrophy and neurodegeneration of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons (BFCNs) and extensive astrocytic hypertrophy resembling these aspects of the neuropathology in AD and DS (Holtzman et al., 1996;Cooper et al., 2001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Holtzman et al., 1996 source
    • cites Cooper et al., 2001 source
  • Findingown data

    Ts1Cje and Ts65Dn-App+/+/− mice, which have two copies of App, showed normal endosomal morphology in the basal forebrain in contrast to Ts65Dn mice.

    “Ts1Cje and TsDn65-App ϩ/ϩ/Ϫ mice, which have two copies of App, showed normal endosomal morphology in the basal forebrain in contrast to Ts65Dn mice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Rab4 immunoreactivity was principally associated with small vesicular profiles consistent with the size and location of recycling vesicles.

    “Rab4 immunoreactivity was principally associated with small vesicular profiles consistent with the size and location of recycling vesicles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 11
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 3
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Ts1Cje mice do not develop BFCN atrophy and degeneration, and they have less severe learning and behavioral deficits than Ts65Dn mice.

    “These mice do not develop BFCN atrophy and degeneration, and they have less severe learning and behavioral deficits than Ts65Dn mice (Sago et al., 1998).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sago et al., 1998 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A twofold overexpression of combined Swedish and London mutations of APP and a sevenfold overexpression of the Swedish mutation of APP in these transgenic mice have been demonstrated previously.

    “A twofold overexpression of the combined Swedish and London mutations of APP and a sevenfold overexpression of the Swedish mutation of APP in these transgenic mice have been demonstrated previously (Sturchler-Pierrat et al., 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sturchler-Pierrat et al., 1997 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The ApoE gene is associated with increased risk of AD and is not located on the triplicated segment of MMU16, but it is overexpressed to higher levels in Ts65Dn mice than predicted on the basis of gene dosage.

    “Finally, the ApoE gene, which is associated with increased risk of AD (Corder et al., 1993), is not located on the triplicated segment of MMU16, but it is overexpressed to higher levels in Ts65Dn mice than is predicted on the basis of gene dosage (Holtzman et al., 1996).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Corder et al., 1993 source
    • cites Holtzman et al., 1996 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Ts65Dn and Ts1Cje mice survive to adulthood and exhibit morphological, biochemical, and transcriptional changes seen in human DS.

    “Two segmental trisomy mouse models of DS, Ts65Dn (Davisson et al., 1990), and Ts1Cje (Sago et al., 1998) mice, survive to adulthood and exhibit a number of the morphological, biochemical, and transcriptional changes seen in the human disease (Davisson et al., 1990;Reeves et al., 1995;Holtzman et al., 1996).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Davisson et al., 1990
    • cites Sago et al., 1998 source
    • cites Reeves et al., 1995 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Not all neuronal populations in Ts65Dn mice exhibited enlarged endosomes; neurons in the caudate nucleus and putamen or in cerebellar Purkinje cells displayed normal-sized early endosomes.

    “Not all neuronal populations in the Ts65Dn mice exhibited enlarged endosomes; neurons in the caudate nucleus and putamen (Fig. 3) or in cerebellar Purkinje cells displayed normal-sized early endosomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Ts65Dn mice show increased immunoreactivity for markers of endosome fusion (rab5, EEA1, rabaptin5) in neurons.

    “the levels of rabaptin5 and EEA1 immunoreactivities were higher in Ts65Dn mice than in age-matched littermate controls (Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Selectively deleting one copy of App or a small portion of the chromosome 16 segment containing App from Ts65Dn mice eliminated the endosomal phenotype.

    “Selectively deleting one copy of App or a small portion of the chromosome 16 segment containing App from Ts65Dn mice eliminated the endosomal phenotype.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The numbers of neurons containing abnormally large endosomes increased in Ts65Dn mice 12 months of age and older, although the magnitude of enlargement did not appear to differ from that seen in young, 2-month-old mice.

    “The numbers of neurons in these regions containing abnormally large endosomes increased in Ts65Dn mice 12 months of age and older, although the magnitude of enlargement did not appear to differ from that seen in the young, 2-month-old mice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The endosomal abnormalities in Ts65Dn mice are most prominent in neurons of the basal forebrain.

    “In young Ts65Dn mice, these enlarged endosomes were prominent in a majority of the neurons in the MSN of the basal forebrain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Findings are consistent with observations that endosomal abnormalities in DS develop in some neurons before birth, which links this phenomenon with dosage of particular genes on the triplicated segment of chromosome 21.

    “These findings are consistent with observations that endosomal abnormalities in DS develop in some neurons before birth, which links this phenomenon with dosage of particular genes on the triplicated segment of chromosome 21.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Immunocytochemical studies of brain tissue from DS subjects have shown a direct correlation between elevated BACE-2 in brain and AD-like neuropathology.

    “Immunocytochemical studies of brain tissue from DS subjects have shown a direct correlation between the appearance of elevated levels of BACE-2 in brain and the presence of AD-like neuropathology (Motonaga et al., 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Motonaga et al., 2002 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Endosomal abnormalities in AD are influenced by ApoE genotype and do not develop in familial AD caused by presenilin mutations.

    “Endosomal abnormalities, which are influenced by ApoE genotype (Cataldo et al., 1997), do not develop in familial AD caused by presenilin mutations (Cataldo et al., 2001), underscoring that they are AD subtype-specific and are also not a response to amyloid deposition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cataldo et al., 1997 source
    • cites Cataldo et al., 2001 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The ApoE4 allele accelerates the onset of endosome pathology in AD.

    “It is relevant, in this regard, that another major genetic risk factor for AD, the ApoE4 allele, also accelerates the onset of endosome pathology in AD (Corder et al., 1993).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Corder et al., 1993 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Endosomal abnormalities are AD subtype-specific and are not a response to amyloid deposition.

    “underscoring that they are AD subtype-specific and are also not a response to amyloid deposition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Increased App gene dosage is necessary but not sufficient for endosome pathology to develop in Ts65Dn mice.

    “Although increased App gene dosage is necessary for endosome pathology to develop in Ts65Dn mice, it is not sufficient, because overexpressing APP alone did not cause endosome pathology or atrophy of basal forebrain neurons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
15 of 15

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 1990, Prog Clin Biol Res, 360, 263
  2. 2002, Neurobiol Aging, 23, 50
  3. 1998, Nat Med, 1, 97

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cataldo, A. M., Petanceska, S., Peterhoff, C. M., Terio, N. B., Epstein, C. J., Villar, A., Carlson, E. J., Staufenbiel, M., & Nixon, R. A.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2003-07-30
Volume
23
Issue
17
Pages
6788-6792
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1900601199
Cited by
241
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hd031498-05, AG17617)
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG017617, AG17617)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-31498)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, Down syndrome, Ts65Dn mouse model, early endosomes, endosome fusion, endosome recycling, Rab5, Rab4, EEA1, amyloid-beta, basal forebrain, neuronal atrophy, gene triplication
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain Chemistry, Disease Models, Animal, Down Syndrome, Endocytosis, Humans, Membrane Proteins, Mice, Neurologic Mutants, Mice, Transgenic, Neurons, Phenotype, Endosomes, Trisomy, Prosencephalon, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Sequence Deletion, Disease Progression, Gene Dosage, rab5 GTP-Binding Proteins, Mice, Presenilin-1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-27.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-27.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review