Cited by 45Neural dynamics and brain functionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Amphetamine Exerts Dose-Dependent Changes in Prefrontal Cortex Attractor Dynamics during Working Memory

Open access
Lapish, C. C., Balaguer-Ballester, E., Seamans, J. K., Phillips, A. G., Durstewitz, D.·2015·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Modulation of neural activity by monoamine neurotransmitters is thought to play an essential role in shaping computational neurodynamics in the neocortex, especially in prefrontal regions. Computational theories propose that monoamines may exert bidirectional (concentration-dependent) effects on cognition by altering prefrontal cortical attractor dynamics according to an inverted U-shaped function. To date, this hypothesis has not been addressed directly, in part because of the absence of appropriate statistical methods required to assess attractor-like behavior in vivo. The present study used a combination of advanced multivariate statistical, time series analysis, and machine learning methods to assess dynamic changes in network activity from multiple single-unit recordings from the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of rats while the animals performed a foraging task guided by working memory after pretreatment with different doses of d-amphetamine (AMPH), which increases monoamine efflux in the mPFC. A dose-dependent, bidirectional effect of AMPH on neural dynamics in the mPFC was observed. Specifically, a 1.0 mg/kg dose of AMPH accentuated separation between task-epoch-specific population states and convergence toward these states. In contrast, a 3.3 mg/kg dose diminished separation and convergence toward task-epoch-specific population states, which was paralleled by deficits in cognitive performance. These results support the computationally derived hypothesis that moderate increases in monoamine efflux would enhance attractor stability, whereas high frontal monoamine levels would severely diminish it. Furthermore, they are consistent with the proposed inverted U-shaped and concentration-dependent modulation of cortical efficiency by monoamines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2421-14.2015

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Arnsten AFT (2007) Catecholamine and second messenger influences on prefrontal cortical networks of "representational knowledge": a rational bridge between genetics and the symptoms of mental illness. Cereb Cor- tex 17 [Suppl 1]:i6 -i15. CrossRef · DOI · Paper page
  2. Arnsten AF, Cai JX, Murphy BL, Goldman-Rakic PS (1994) Dopamine D1 receptor mechanisms in the cognitive performance of young adult and aged monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 116:143-151. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  3. Aston-Jones G, Cohen JD (2005a) Adaptive gain and the role of the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system in optimal performance. J Comp Neu- rol 493:99 -110. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  4. Aston-Jones G, Cohen JD (2005b) An integrative theory of locus coeruleus- norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annu Rev Neurosci 28:403-450. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  5. Aujla H, Beninger RJ (2001) Hippocampal-prefrontocortical circuits: PKA inhibition in the prefrontal cortex impairs delayed nonmatching in the radial maze in rats. Behav Neurosci 115:1204 -1211. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  6. Aultman JM, Moghaddam B (2001) Distinct contributions of glutamate and dopamine receptors to temporal aspects of rodent working memory using a clinically relevant task. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 153:353-364. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  7. Balaguer-Ballester E, Lapish CC, Seamans JK, Durstewitz D (2011) Attract- ing dynamics of frontal cortex ensembles during memory-guided decision-making. Plos Comput Biol 7:e1002057. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  8. Barch DM, Carter CS (2005) Amphetamine improves cognitive function in medicated individuals with schizophrenia and in healthy volunteers. Schizophr Res 77:43-58. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  9. Berridge CW, Stalnaker TA (2002) Relationship between low-dose amphetamine-induced arousal and extracellular norepinephrine and do- pamine levels within prefrontal cortex. Synapse 46:140 -149. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  10. Chudasama Y, Nathwani F, Robbins TW (2005) D-Amphetamine remedi- ates attentional performance in rats with dorsal prefrontal lesions. Behav Brain Res 158:97-107. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  11. Compte A, Brunel N, Goldman-Rakic PS, Wang XJ (2000) Synaptic mech- anisms and network dynamics underlying spatial working memory in a cortical network model. Cereb Cortex 10:910 -923. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  12. Durstewitz D (2009) Implications of synaptic biophysics for recurrent net- work dynamics and active memory. Neural Netws 22:1189 -1200. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  13. Durstewitz D, Seamans JK (2002) The computational role of dopamine D1 receptors in working memory. Neural Netw 15:561-572. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  14. Durstewitz D, Seamans JK (2008) The dual-state theory of prefrontal cortex dopamine function with relevance to catechol-o-methyltransferase geno- types and schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 64:739 -749. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  15. Durstewitz D, Seamans JK, Sejnowski TJ (2000) Neurocomputational mod- els of working memory. Nat Neurosci [Suppl] 3:1184 -1191. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  16. Grilly DM, Loveland A (2001) What is a "low dose" of d-amphetamine for inducing behavioral effects in laboratory rats? Psychopharmacology (Berl) 153:155-169. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  17. Gulley JM, Stanis JJ (2010) Adaptations in medial prefrontal cortex function associated with amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization. Neuro- science 166:615-624. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  18. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learn- ing. New York: Springer.
  19. Howes OD, Kapur S (2009) The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia: version III-the final common pathway. Schizophr Bull 35:549 -562. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kantz H, Schreiber T (2004) Nonlinear time series analysis, 2 edition. Cam- bridge: Cambridge UP.
  21. Krystal JH, Perry EB Jr, Gueorguieva R, Belger A, Madonick SH, Abi- Dargham A, Cooper TB, Macdougall L, Abi-Saab W, D'Souza DC (2005) Comparative and interactive human psychopharmacologic effects of ketamine and amphetamine: implications for glutamatergic and dopami- nergic model psychoses and cognitive function. Arch Gen Psychiatry 62: 985-994. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  22. Lapish CC, Durstewitz D, Chandler LJ, Seamans JK (2008) Successful choice behavior is associated with distinct and coherent network states in anterior cingulate cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:11963-11968. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  23. Mattay VS, Callicott JH, Bertolino A, Heaton I, Frank JA, Coppola R, Berman KF, Goldberg TE, Weinberger DR (2000) Effects of dextroamphetamine on cognitive performance and cortical activation. Neuroimage 12:268 - 275. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  24. Mika S, Rätsch G, Weston B, Schölkopf B, Smola AJ, Müller K (2000) Ad- vances in neural information processing systems. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 526 -542. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
  25. Montani F, Ince RAA, Senatore R, Arabzadeh E, Diamond ME, Panzeri S (2009) The impact of high-order interactions on the rate of synchronous discharge and information transmission in somatosensory cortex. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 367:3297-3310. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  26. Ohiorhenuan IE, Mechler F, Purpura KP, Schmid AM, Hu Q, Victor JD (2010) Sparse coding and high-order correlations in fine-scale cortical networks. Nature 466:617-621. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  27. Omi T, Shinomoto S (2011) Optimizing time histograms for non- Poissonian spike trains. Neural Comput 23:3125-3144. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  28. Pum M, Carey RJ, Huston JP, Mu ¨ller CP (2007) Dissociating effects of co- caine and d-amphetamine on dopamine and serotonin in the perirhinal, entorhinal, and prefrontal cortex of freely moving rats. Psychopharma- cology (Berl) 193:375-390. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  29. Quian Quiroga R, Panzeri S (2009) Extracting information from neuronal populations: information theory and decoding approaches. Nat Rev Neu- rosci 10:173-185. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  30. Rabinovich MI, Varona P (2011) Robust transient dynamics and brain functions. Front Comput Neurosci 5:24. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  31. Rabinovich M, Huerta R, Laurent G (2008) Neuroscience. Transient dy- namics for neural processing. Science 321:48 -50. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  32. Riehle A, Gru ¨n S, Diesmann M, Aertsen A (1997) Spike synchronization and rate modulation differentially involved in motor cortical function. Science 278:1950 -1953. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  33. Sauer T, Yorke JA (1993) How many delay coordinates do you need? Int J Bifurc Chaos 03:737-744. CrossRef · DOI
  34. Schneidman E, Berry MJ 2nd, Segev R, Bialek W (2006) Weak pairwise cor- relations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population. Nature 440:1007-1012. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  35. Scho ¨lkopf B, Smola AJ, Mu ¨ller K (1998) Kernel principal component anal- ysis. Neural Comput 10:1299 -1316. CrossRef · DOI
  36. Seamans JK, Yang CR (2004) The principal features and mechanisms of dopamine modulation in the prefrontal cortex. Prog Neurobiol 74:1-58. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  37. Seamans JK, Floresco SB, Phillips AG (1995) Functional differences be- tween the prelimbic and anterior cingulate regions of the rat prefrontal cortex. Behav Neurosci 109:1063-1073. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  38. Seamans JK, Durstewitz D, Christie BR, Stevens CF, Sejnowski TJ (2001a) Dopamine D1/D5 receptor modulation of excitatory synaptic inputs to layer V prefrontal cortex neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:301-306. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  39. Seeman P (2011) Schizophrenia diagnosis and treatment. CNS Neurosci Ther 17:81-82. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  40. Servan-Schreiber D, Carter CS, Bruno RM, Cohen JD (1998) Dopamine and the mechanisms of cognition: Part II. D-amphetamine effects in hu- man subjects performing a selective attention task. Biol Psychiatry 43: 723-729. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  41. Shoblock JR, Maisonneuve IM, Glick SD (2003) Differences between d-methamphetamine and d-amphetamine in rats: working memory, tol- erance, and extinction. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 170:150 -156. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  42. Stelzel C, Fiebach CJ, Cools R, Tafazoli S, D'Esposito M (2013) Dissociable fronto-striatal effects of dopamine D2 receptor stimulation on cognitive versus motor flexibility. Cortex 49:2799 -2811. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  43. Stone TW (1976) Responses of neurones in the cerebral cortex and caudate nucleus to amantadine, amphetamine and dopamine. Br J Pharmacol 56:101-110. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  44. St Onge JR, Abhari H, Floresco SB (2011) Dissociable contributions by pre- frontal D1 and D2 receptors to risk-based decision making. J Neurosci 31:8625-8633. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  45. Sulzer D, Sonders MS, Poulsen NW, Galli A (2005) Mechanisms of neu- rotransmitter release by amphetamines: a review. Prog Neurobiol 75: 406 -433. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  46. Tipper CM, Cairo TA, Woodward TS, Phillips AG, Liddle PF, Ngan ETC (2005) Processing efficiency of a verbal working memory system is mod- ulated by amphetamine: an fMRI investigation. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 180:634 -643. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  47. White NM, McDonald RJ (2002) Multiple parallel memory systems in the brain of the rat. Neurobiol Learn Mem 77:125-184. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  48. Witten DM, Tibshirani R (2011) Penalized classification using Fisher's lin- ear discriminant. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 73:753-772. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  49. Yu BM, Cunningham JP, Santhanam G, Ryu SI, Shenoy KV, Sahani M (2009) Gaussian-process factor analysis for low-dimensional single-trial analysis of neural population activity. J Neurophysiol 102:614 -635. CrossRef Medline · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lapish, C. C., Balaguer-Ballester, E., Seamans, J. K., Phillips, A. G., & Durstewitz, D.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2015-07-15
Volume
35
Issue
28
Pages
10172-10187
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1502005084
Cited by
45
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • PMC
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA022821, R01AA022821, R01AA023786, AA023786, P60AA007611)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
amphetamine, medial prefrontal cortex, attractor dynamics, working memory, monoamines, dose-dependent effects, inverted U-shaped relationship, single-unit recording, foraging task, attractor stability
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Animals, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neurons, Time Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Prefrontal Cortex, Nonlinear Dynamics, Maze Learning, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review