Amphetamine Exerts Dose-Dependent Changes in Prefrontal Cortex Attractor Dynamics during Working Memory
Open accessAbstract
Modulation of neural activity by monoamine neurotransmitters is thought to play an essential role in shaping computational neurodynamics in the neocortex, especially in prefrontal regions. Computational theories propose that monoamines may exert bidirectional (concentration-dependent) effects on cognition by altering prefrontal cortical attractor dynamics according to an inverted U-shaped function. To date, this hypothesis has not been addressed directly, in part because of the absence of appropriate statistical methods required to assess attractor-like behavior in vivo. The present study used a combination of advanced multivariate statistical, time series analysis, and machine learning methods to assess dynamic changes in network activity from multiple single-unit recordings from the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of rats while the animals performed a foraging task guided by working memory after pretreatment with different doses of d-amphetamine (AMPH), which increases monoamine efflux in the mPFC. A dose-dependent, bidirectional effect of AMPH on neural dynamics in the mPFC was observed. Specifically, a 1.0 mg/kg dose of AMPH accentuated separation between task-epoch-specific population states and convergence toward these states. In contrast, a 3.3 mg/kg dose diminished separation and convergence toward task-epoch-specific population states, which was paralleled by deficits in cognitive performance. These results support the computationally derived hypothesis that moderate increases in monoamine efflux would enhance attractor stability, whereas high frontal monoamine levels would severely diminish it. Furthermore, they are consistent with the proposed inverted U-shaped and concentration-dependent modulation of cortical efficiency by monoamines.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Psychostimulants (i.e., d-amphetamine) action on the DA system exerts bidirectional effects, improving or decreasing working memory performance depending on the dosage (inverted U-shaped curve).
“In fact, psychostimulants (i.e., d-amphetamine) action on the DA system exerts bidirectional effects, improving or decreasing working memory performance depending on the dosage (inverted U-shaped curve) (39, 40).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Detecting strange attractors in turbulence
Takens, F. (1981) · Lecture Notes in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/bfb0091924 · Cited by 10,459 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…detailed aspects of the precise system dynamics (like the convergence to attractor states) that were not accessible from the current state alone [Takens, 1981; Sauer and Yorke, 1993; these ideas have been formalized by a number of theorems in nonlinear dynamics and evaluated on multiple…”
BackgroundNeural correlations, population coding and computation
Averbeck, B. B., Latham, P. E., & Pouget, A. (2006) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1888 · Cited by 1,743 · see citing works
Mattay, V. S., Goldberg, T. E., Fera, F., Hariri, A. R., Tessitore, A., Egan, M. F., Kolachana, B., Callicott, J. H., & Weinberger, D. R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0931309100 · Cited by 893 · see citing works
Brunel, N., & Wang, X.-J. (2001) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1023/a:1011204814320 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Catecholamine Influences on Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortical Networks
Arnsten, A. F. T. (2011) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.01.027 · Cited by 493 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The dose– concentration effect also appears to exhibit an inverted U shape, consistent with many past studies on catecholaminergic modulation of cognition (Arnsten, 2007, 2011).”
ResultThe Physiological Role of 5-HT<sub>2A</sub>Receptors in Working Memory
Williams, G. V., Rao, S. G., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-07-02843.2002 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Armbruster, D. J. N., Ueltzhöffer, K., Basten, U., & Fiebach, C. J. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00286 · Cited by 202 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This in turn may facilitate cognitive functions, such as flexibility and task switching, as supported by recent in vivo measures of DA during cognitive tasks (St Onge et al., 2011) and behavioral observations (Floresco and Magyanar, 2006; Armbruster et al., 2012; Stelzel et al., 2013).”
BackgroundMattay, V. S., Berman, K. F., Ostrem, J. L., Esposito, G., Van Horn, J. D., Bigelow, L. B., & Weinberger, D. R. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-15-04816.1996 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- Arnsten AFT (2007) Catecholamine and second messenger influences on prefrontal cortical networks of "representational knowledge": a rational bridge between genetics and the symptoms of mental illness. Cereb Cor- tex 17 [Suppl 1]:i6 -i15. CrossRef · DOI · Paper page
- Arnsten AF, Cai JX, Murphy BL, Goldman-Rakic PS (1994) Dopamine D1 receptor mechanisms in the cognitive performance of young adult and aged monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 116:143-151. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
- Aston-Jones G, Cohen JD (2005a) Adaptive gain and the role of the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system in optimal performance. J Comp Neu- rol 493:99 -110. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Aston-Jones G, Cohen JD (2005b) An integrative theory of locus coeruleus- norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annu Rev Neurosci 28:403-450. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
- Aujla H, Beninger RJ (2001) Hippocampal-prefrontocortical circuits: PKA inhibition in the prefrontal cortex impairs delayed nonmatching in the radial maze in rats. Behav Neurosci 115:1204 -1211. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Aultman JM, Moghaddam B (2001) Distinct contributions of glutamate and dopamine receptors to temporal aspects of rodent working memory using a clinically relevant task. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 153:353-364. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Balaguer-Ballester E, Lapish CC, Seamans JK, Durstewitz D (2011) Attract- ing dynamics of frontal cortex ensembles during memory-guided decision-making. Plos Comput Biol 7:e1002057. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Barch DM, Carter CS (2005) Amphetamine improves cognitive function in medicated individuals with schizophrenia and in healthy volunteers. Schizophr Res 77:43-58. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
- Berridge CW, Stalnaker TA (2002) Relationship between low-dose amphetamine-induced arousal and extracellular norepinephrine and do- pamine levels within prefrontal cortex. Synapse 46:140 -149. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Chudasama Y, Nathwani F, Robbins TW (2005) D-Amphetamine remedi- ates attentional performance in rats with dorsal prefrontal lesions. Behav Brain Res 158:97-107. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Compte A, Brunel N, Goldman-Rakic PS, Wang XJ (2000) Synaptic mech- anisms and network dynamics underlying spatial working memory in a cortical network model. Cereb Cortex 10:910 -923. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
- Durstewitz D (2009) Implications of synaptic biophysics for recurrent net- work dynamics and active memory. Neural Netws 22:1189 -1200. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Durstewitz D, Seamans JK (2002) The computational role of dopamine D1 receptors in working memory. Neural Netw 15:561-572. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Durstewitz D, Seamans JK (2008) The dual-state theory of prefrontal cortex dopamine function with relevance to catechol-o-methyltransferase geno- types and schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 64:739 -749. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
- Durstewitz D, Seamans JK, Sejnowski TJ (2000) Neurocomputational mod- els of working memory. Nat Neurosci [Suppl] 3:1184 -1191. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Grilly DM, Loveland A (2001) What is a "low dose" of d-amphetamine for inducing behavioral effects in laboratory rats? Psychopharmacology (Berl) 153:155-169. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Gulley JM, Stanis JJ (2010) Adaptations in medial prefrontal cortex function associated with amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization. Neuro- science 166:615-624. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learn- ing. New York: Springer.
- Howes OD, Kapur S (2009) The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia: version III-the final common pathway. Schizophr Bull 35:549 -562. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
- Kantz H, Schreiber T (2004) Nonlinear time series analysis, 2 edition. Cam- bridge: Cambridge UP.
- Krystal JH, Perry EB Jr, Gueorguieva R, Belger A, Madonick SH, Abi- Dargham A, Cooper TB, Macdougall L, Abi-Saab W, D'Souza DC (2005) Comparative and interactive human psychopharmacologic effects of ketamine and amphetamine: implications for glutamatergic and dopami- nergic model psychoses and cognitive function. Arch Gen Psychiatry 62: 985-994. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
- Lapish CC, Durstewitz D, Chandler LJ, Seamans JK (2008) Successful choice behavior is associated with distinct and coherent network states in anterior cingulate cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:11963-11968. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
- Mattay VS, Callicott JH, Bertolino A, Heaton I, Frank JA, Coppola R, Berman KF, Goldberg TE, Weinberger DR (2000) Effects of dextroamphetamine on cognitive performance and cortical activation. Neuroimage 12:268 - 275. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
- Mika S, Rätsch G, Weston B, Schölkopf B, Smola AJ, Müller K (2000) Ad- vances in neural information processing systems. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 526 -542. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
- Montani F, Ince RAA, Senatore R, Arabzadeh E, Diamond ME, Panzeri S (2009) The impact of high-order interactions on the rate of synchronous discharge and information transmission in somatosensory cortex. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 367:3297-3310. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Ohiorhenuan IE, Mechler F, Purpura KP, Schmid AM, Hu Q, Victor JD (2010) Sparse coding and high-order correlations in fine-scale cortical networks. Nature 466:617-621. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Omi T, Shinomoto S (2011) Optimizing time histograms for non- Poissonian spike trains. Neural Comput 23:3125-3144. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Pum M, Carey RJ, Huston JP, Mu ¨ller CP (2007) Dissociating effects of co- caine and d-amphetamine on dopamine and serotonin in the perirhinal, entorhinal, and prefrontal cortex of freely moving rats. Psychopharma- cology (Berl) 193:375-390. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Quian Quiroga R, Panzeri S (2009) Extracting information from neuronal populations: information theory and decoding approaches. Nat Rev Neu- rosci 10:173-185. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Rabinovich MI, Varona P (2011) Robust transient dynamics and brain functions. Front Comput Neurosci 5:24. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Rabinovich M, Huerta R, Laurent G (2008) Neuroscience. Transient dy- namics for neural processing. Science 321:48 -50. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Riehle A, Gru ¨n S, Diesmann M, Aertsen A (1997) Spike synchronization and rate modulation differentially involved in motor cortical function. Science 278:1950 -1953. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Sauer T, Yorke JA (1993) How many delay coordinates do you need? Int J Bifurc Chaos 03:737-744. CrossRef · DOI
- Schneidman E, Berry MJ 2nd, Segev R, Bialek W (2006) Weak pairwise cor- relations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population. Nature 440:1007-1012. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Scho ¨lkopf B, Smola AJ, Mu ¨ller K (1998) Kernel principal component anal- ysis. Neural Comput 10:1299 -1316. CrossRef · DOI
- Seamans JK, Yang CR (2004) The principal features and mechanisms of dopamine modulation in the prefrontal cortex. Prog Neurobiol 74:1-58. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
- Seamans JK, Floresco SB, Phillips AG (1995) Functional differences be- tween the prelimbic and anterior cingulate regions of the rat prefrontal cortex. Behav Neurosci 109:1063-1073. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Seamans JK, Durstewitz D, Christie BR, Stevens CF, Sejnowski TJ (2001a) Dopamine D1/D5 receptor modulation of excitatory synaptic inputs to layer V prefrontal cortex neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:301-306. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Seeman P (2011) Schizophrenia diagnosis and treatment. CNS Neurosci Ther 17:81-82. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Servan-Schreiber D, Carter CS, Bruno RM, Cohen JD (1998) Dopamine and the mechanisms of cognition: Part II. D-amphetamine effects in hu- man subjects performing a selective attention task. Biol Psychiatry 43: 723-729. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
- Shoblock JR, Maisonneuve IM, Glick SD (2003) Differences between d-methamphetamine and d-amphetamine in rats: working memory, tol- erance, and extinction. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 170:150 -156. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Stelzel C, Fiebach CJ, Cools R, Tafazoli S, D'Esposito M (2013) Dissociable fronto-striatal effects of dopamine D2 receptor stimulation on cognitive versus motor flexibility. Cortex 49:2799 -2811. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Stone TW (1976) Responses of neurones in the cerebral cortex and caudate nucleus to amantadine, amphetamine and dopamine. Br J Pharmacol 56:101-110. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- St Onge JR, Abhari H, Floresco SB (2011) Dissociable contributions by pre- frontal D1 and D2 receptors to risk-based decision making. J Neurosci 31:8625-8633. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Sulzer D, Sonders MS, Poulsen NW, Galli A (2005) Mechanisms of neu- rotransmitter release by amphetamines: a review. Prog Neurobiol 75: 406 -433. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Tipper CM, Cairo TA, Woodward TS, Phillips AG, Liddle PF, Ngan ETC (2005) Processing efficiency of a verbal working memory system is mod- ulated by amphetamine: an fMRI investigation. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 180:634 -643. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
- White NM, McDonald RJ (2002) Multiple parallel memory systems in the brain of the rat. Neurobiol Learn Mem 77:125-184. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Witten DM, Tibshirani R (2011) Penalized classification using Fisher's lin- ear discriminant. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 73:753-772. CrossRef Medline · DOI
- Yu BM, Cunningham JP, Santhanam G, Ryu SI, Shenoy KV, Sahani M (2009) Gaussian-process factor analysis for low-dimensional single-trial analysis of neural population activity. J Neurophysiol 102:614 -635. CrossRef Medline · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jian-min, C., Zhi-yuan, W., Shi-xuan, W., Rui, S., Ning, W., & Jin, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.885574 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“, d-amphetamine) action on the DA system exerts bidirectional effects, improving or decreasing working memory performance depending on the dosage (inverted U-shaped curve) (39, 40).”
Background
- Authors
- Lapish, C. C., Balaguer-Ballester, E., Seamans, J. K., Phillips, A. G., & Durstewitz, D.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2015-07-15
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 28
- Pages
- 10172-10187
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC4502258
- OpenAlex
- W1502005084
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) (acceptedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- PMC
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA022821, R01AA022821, R01AA023786, AA023786, P60AA007611)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- amphetamine, medial prefrontal cortex, attractor dynamics, working memory, monoamines, dose-dependent effects, inverted U-shaped relationship, single-unit recording, foraging task, attractor stability
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Animals, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neurons, Time Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Prefrontal Cortex, Nonlinear Dynamics, Maze Learning, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review