Cited by 157Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchIon channel regulation and functionNeural dynamics and brain function

Spine neck plasticity controls postsynaptic calcium signals through electrical compartmentalization

Open access
Grunditz, Åsa, Holbro, Niklaus, Tian, Lei, Zuo, Yi, Oertner, Thomas G.·2008·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Dendritic spines have been proposed to function as electrical compartments for the active processing of local synaptic signals. However, estimates of the resistance between the spine head and the parent dendrite suggest that compartmentalization is not tight enough to electrically decouple the synapse. Here we show in acute hippocampal slices that spine compartmentalization is initially very weak, but increases dramatically upon postsynaptic depolarization. Using NMDA receptors as voltage sensors, we provide evidence that spine necks not only regulate diffusional coupling between spines and dendrites, but also control local depolarization of the spine head. In spines with high-resistance necks, presynaptic activity alone was sufficient to trigger calcium influx through NMDA receptors and R-type calcium channels. We conclude that calcium influx into spines, a key trigger for synaptic plasticity, is dynamically regulated by spine neck plasticity through a process of electrical compartmentalization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2702-08.2008

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Induction of plasticity results in an increase in spine size and changes in spine shape.

    “Interestingly, induction of plasticity not only results in an increase in spine size (Matsuzaki et al., 2004; Tanaka et al., 2008), but also in changes in spine shape (Grunditz et al., 2008), with consequences for compartmentalization.”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Grunditz et al., 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Koch C (1999) Biophysics of computation. New York: Oxford UP.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grunditz, Å., Holbro, N., Tian, L., Zuo, Y., & Oertner, T. G.
Affiliations
  • Friedrich Miescher Institute (CH)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Corresponding author
Oertner, Thomas G.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2008-12-10
Volume
28
Issue
50
Pages
13457-13466
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1974971758
Cited by
157
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
dendritic spines, NMDA receptor, R-type calcium channels, synaptic plasticity, hippocampus, postsynaptic depolarization
MeSH terms
Animals, Dendrites, Hippocampus, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Organ Culture Techniques, Calcium Channels, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Calcium Signaling, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review