Cited by 288Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Synaptic amplification by dendritic spines enhances input cooperativity

Open access
Harnett, Mark T., Makara, Judit K., Spruston, Nelson, Kath, William L., Magee, Jeffrey C.·2012·Nature

Abstract

Dendritic spines are the nearly ubiquitous site of excitatory synaptic input onto neurons and as such are critically positioned to influence diverse aspects of neuronal signalling. Decades of theoretical studies have proposed that spines may function as highly effective and modifiable chemical and electrical compartments that regulate synaptic efficacy, integration and plasticity. Experimental studies have confirmed activity-dependent structural dynamics and biochemical compartmentalization by spines. However, there is a longstanding debate over the influence of spines on the electrical aspects of synaptic transmission and dendritic operation. Here we measure the amplitude ratio of spine head to parent dendrite voltage across a range of dendritic compartments and calculate the associated spine neck resistance (R(neck)) for spines at apical trunk dendrites in rat hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. We find that R(neck) is large enough (~500 MΩ) to amplify substantially the spine head depolarization associated with a unitary synaptic input by ~1.5- to ~45-fold, depending on parent dendritic impedance. A morphologically realistic compartmental model capable of reproducing the observed spatial profile of the amplitude ratio indicates that spines provide a consistently high-impedance input structure throughout the dendritic arborization. Finally, we demonstrate that the amplification produced by spines encourages electrical interaction among coactive inputs through an R(neck)-dependent increase in spine head voltage-gated conductance activation. We conclude that the electrical properties of spines promote nonlinear dendritic processing and associated forms of plasticity and storage, thus fundamentally enhancing the computational capabilities of neurons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature11554

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because of the high spine neck resistance (~1 GΩ), an unpotentiated EPSP can approximate 25 mV.

    “Because of the high spine neck resistance (∼1 GΩ) it is calculated that an unpotentiated EPSP can approximate 25 mV (185, 186).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [185]

    The passage labeled Abstract (page not provided) estimates a spine-head depolarization of ~25 mV for an average unitary event, based on a ~0.5 mV dendritic EPSP. But it reports spine-neck resistance of 514 ± 44 MΩ, not ~1 GΩ, and does not specify that the event is unpotentiated. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Active properties of dendritic spines play an important role in interactions between multiple synaptic inputs in dendritic computation.

    “These active properties of dendritic spines are thought to play an important role in the interactions between multiple synaptic inputs in dendritic computation (Araya et al., 2007; Harnett et al., 2012).”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Harnett et al., 2012

  • Activating VDCCs, which are present in spines, evokes cytosolic spine Ca2+ transients and the activation of cytosolic spine CaMKII.

    “Activating VDCCs, which are present in spines, evokes cytosolic spine Ca2+ transients (185–187) and the activation of cytosolic spine CaMKII (188).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [185]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harnett, M. T., Makara, J. K., Spruston, N., Kath, W. L., & Magee, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Magee, Jeffrey C.
Venue
Nature
Published
2012-10-28
Volume
491
Issue
7425
Pages
599-602
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2068904459
Cited by
288
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Wellcome Trust (090915)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS046064, NS-077601, R01NS077601, NS046064)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
dendritic spines, dendritic integration, CA1 pyramidal neurons, dendritic compartmentalization, synaptic plasticity
MeSH terms
Animals, Male, Models, Neurological, Synapses, Electric Impedance, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, Wistar, Pyramidal Cells, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Dendritic Spines, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review