Cited by 51Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesNeural dynamics and brain function

Super-resolution 2-photon microscopy reveals that the morphology of each dendritic spine correlates with diffusive but not synaptic properties

Open access
Takasaki, Kevin, Sabatini, Bernardo L.·2014·Frontiers in Neuroanatomy

Abstract

The structure of dendritic spines suggests a specialized function in compartmentalizing synaptic signals near active synapses. Indeed, theoretical and experimental analyses indicate that the diffusive resistance of the spine neck is sufficient to effectively compartmentalize some signaling molecules in a spine for the duration of their activated lifetime. Here we describe the application of 2-photon microscopy combined with stimulated emission depletion (STED-2P) to the biophysical study of the relationship between synaptic signals and spine morphology, demonstrating the utility of combining STED-2P with modern optical and electrophysiological techniques. Morphological determinants of fluorescence recovery time were identified and evaluated within the context of a simple compartmental model describing diffusive transfer between spine and dendrite. Correlations between the neck geometry and the amplitude of synaptic potentials and calcium transients evoked by 2-photon glutamate uncaging were also investigated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnana.2014.00029

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent breakthroughs in fluorescence microscopy allow imaging at resolutions below the diffraction limit, allowing to directly explore how spine shape affects diffusion of cytoplasmic or membrane-embedded molecules.

    “Recent breakthroughs in fluorescence microscopy allow imaging at resolutions below the diffraction limit, allowing to directly explore how spine shape affects diffusion of cytoplasmic or membrane-embedded molecules (Takasaki and Sabatini, 2014; Tønnesen et al., 2014).”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Takasaki and Sabatini, 2014

    The Introduction reports that STED-2P achieves ~50 nm resolution, and the Results describe combining spine imaging with fluorescence recovery measurements to examine diffusion of a cytoplasmic dye. The paper does not report examining diffusion of membrane-embedded molecules, so that part of the sentence is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Takasaki and Sabatini find a weak decrease of recovery time with spine head volume, whereas the equation suggests a linear increase.

    “However, whereas the equation suggests a linear increase of the recovery time scale with spine head volume, Takasaki and Sabatini (2014) instead find a weak decrease.”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Takasaki and Sabatini, 2014

    The Modeling of diffusive compartmentalization section gives equation (3), in which recovery time increases linearly with spine head volume when the other parameters are held fixed. In Results (Figure 2E), the measured association is weakly negative (r = −0.19), but it is not statistically significant (p = 0.26). Describing it as a decrease the authors ‘find’ overstates that result. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Electric compartmentalization is moderate, but not absent, in most spines.

    “Most recently, STED microscopy on dendritic spines in organotypic and acute slices suggested that electric compartmentalization is moderate, but not absent, in most spines (Takasaki and Sabatini, 2014; Tønnesen et al., 2014).”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Takasaki and Sabatini, 2014

    The Introduction reports evidence of significant voltage drops across spine necks, supporting the suggestion that electrical compartmentalization is not absent. But the Discussion (‘Correlation of morphology and synaptic signals’; page unavailable) says this study found no significant correlation between spine dimensions and synaptic potentials, and it does not establish that compartmentalization is moderate in most spines. Its STED-2P analysis was limited to acute brain slices. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A fraction of spines strongly deviated from the average trends, suggesting that small local constrictions, local protein accumulations and organelle positioning in the neck may create additional diffusion barriers.

    “Interestingly, a fraction of spines strongly deviated from the average trends that were observed (Takasaki and Sabatini, 2014), suggesting that small local constrictions, local protein accumulations and organelle positioning in the neck may create additional diffusion barriers (Arellano et al., 2007; Yuste, 2013).”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Takasaki and Sabatini, 2014

  • There is an inverse relation between spine neck diameter d and recovery time, which appears to follow the predicted inverse quadratic relation (τ ∝ 1/d2).

    “Indeed, both groups find an inverse relation between spine neck diameter d and the recovery time, which appears to follow the predicted inverse quadratic relation (τ ∝ 1/d2).”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Takasaki and Sabatini, 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takasaki, K., & Sabatini, B. L.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Sabatini, Bernardo L.
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
Published
2014-05-07
Volume
8
Pages
29-29
ISSN
1662-5129 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129084669
Cited by
51
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroanatomy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (RC1NS068917)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
dendritic spines, dendritic spine morphology, glutamate uncaging, calcium transients, synaptic potentials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review