Cited by 148

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interaction of the Cytosolic Domains of sorLA/LR11 with the Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP) and β-Secretase β-Site APP-Cleaving Enzyme

Spoelgen, Robert, von Arnim, Christine A. F., Thomas, Anne V., Peltan, Ithan D., Koker, Mirjam, Deng, Amy, Irizarry, Michael C., Andersen, Olav M., Willnow, Thomas E., Hyman, Bradley T.·2006·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

sorLA is a recently identified neuronal receptor for amyloid precursor protein (APP) that is known to interact with APP and affect its intracellular transport and processing. Decreased levels of sorLA in the brain of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and elevated levels of amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) in sorLA-deficient mice point to the importance of the receptor in this neurodegenerative disorder. We analyzed APP cleavage in an APP-shedding assay and found that both sorLA and, surprisingly, a sorLA tail construct inhibited APP cleavage in a β-site APP-cleaving enzyme (BACE)-dependent manner. In line with this finding, sorLA and the sorLA tail significantly reduced secreted Aβ levels when BACE was overexpressed, suggesting that sorLA influencesβ-cleavage. To understand the effect of sorLA on APP cleavage by BACE, we analyzed whether sorLA interacts with APP and/or BACE. Because both full-length sorLA and sorLA C-terminal tail constructs were functionally relevant for APP processing, we analyzed sorLA–APP for a potential cytoplasmatic interaction domain. sorLA and C99 coimmunoprecipitated, pointing toward the existence of a new cytoplasmatic interaction site between sorLA and APP. Moreover, sorLA and BACE also coimmunoprecipitate. Thus, sorLA interacts both with BACE and APP and might therefore directly affect BACE–APP complex formation. To test whether sorLA impacts BACE–APP interactions, we used a fluorescence resonance energy transfer assay to evaluate BACE–APP interactions in cells. We discovered that sorLA significantly reduced BACE–APP interactions in Golgi. We postulate that sorLA acts as a trafficking receptor that prevents BACE–APP interactions and hence BACE cleavage of APP.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3882-05.2006

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SORLA reduces APP and BACE1 interactions while directly binding and facilitating Aβ internalization and lysosomal degradation.

    “In addition, SORLA reduces APP and BACE1 (Spoelgen, von Arnim et al. 2006) interactions while directly binding and facilitating Aβ internalization and lysosomal degradation (Caglayan, Takagi-Niidome et al. 2014, Liu, Zhu et al. 2020).”

    From SORLA up-regulation suppresses pathological effects in aged tauopathy mouse brain (2026) · cites this paper as Spoelgen, von Arnim et al. 2006

  • LR11/SorLA interacts with APP and affects its subcellular localization and proteolytic processing.

    “It was demonstrated that LR11/SorLA interacts with APP and affects its subcellular localization and proteolytic processing (Andersen et al., 2006;Offe et al., 2006;Spoelgen et al., 2006).”

    From GGA1 Is Expressed in the Human Brain and Affects the Generation of Amyloid β-Peptide (2006) · cites this paper as Spoelgen et al., 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1073/pnas.0503689102 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1117/1.1584442 · DOI
  3. 2003, Sci Aging Knowledge Environ, 2003, PE14
  4. 10.1083/jcb.138.3.671 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/nm0997-1021 · DOI
  6. 10.1097/00001756-199909290-00017 · DOI
  7. 10.1001/archneur.60.7.958 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/357500a0 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nm0997-1016 · DOI
  10. 10.1074/jbc.M411296200 · DOI
  11. 10.1074/jbc.M004175200 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1006/mcne.1999.0811 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02581.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1074/jbc.M100857200 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)03299-9 · DOI
  16. 2001, J Neurosci, 21, 8354, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-21-08354.2001 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1074/jbc.M306403200 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 1994, J Biol Chem, 269, 17386, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)32449-3 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 1996, J Cell Sci, 109, 991, 10.1242/jcs.109.5.991 · DOI
  20. 1997, Neurology, 48, 741, 10.1212/WNL.48.3.741 · DOI
  21. 1993, Biochem J, 295, 367, 10.1042/bj2950367 · DOI
  22. 10.1074/jbc.270.8.3565 · DOI
  23. 10.1074/jbc.M303861200 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1073/pnas.97.4.1456 · DOI
  25. 10.1074/jbc.271.15.9100 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00299-9 · DOI
  27. 10.1001/archneur.61.8.1200 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 2001, Physiol Rev, 81, 741, 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.741 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2004.00188.x · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11049 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/990114 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1161/hq0901.094500 · DOI
  33. 10.1074/jbc.C100218200 · DOI
  34. 10.1242/jcs.01422 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1126/science.1096187 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/19077 · DOI
  37. 10.1073/pnas.97.16.9299 · DOI
  38. 10.1074/jbc.271.40.24761 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/990107 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1126/science.1060896 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Spoelgen, R., von Arnim, C. A. F., Thomas, A. V., Peltan, I. D., Koker, M., Deng, A., Irizarry, M. C., Andersen, O. M., Willnow, T. E., & Hyman, B. T.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2006-01-11
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
418-428
ISSN
  • 0270-6474
  • 1529-2401
Cited by
148
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review