Cited by 165

Dendrites of mammalian neurons contain specialized P-body-like structures that respond to neuronal activation

Cougot, Nicolas, Bhattacharyya, Suvendra N., Tapia-Arancibia, Lucie, Bordonné, Remy, Filipowicz, Witold, Bertrand, Edouard, Rage, Florence·2008·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Intracellular mRNA transport and local translation play a key role in neuronal physiology. Translationally repressed mRNAs are transported as a part of ribonucleoprotein (RNP) particles to distant dendritic sites, but the properties of different RNP particles and mechanisms of their repression and transport remain largely unknown. Here, we describe a new class of RNP-particles, the dendritic P-body-like structures (dlPbodies), which are present in the soma and dendrites of mammalian neurons and have both similarities and differences to P-bodies of non-neuronal cells. These structures stain positively for a number of P-body and microRNP components, a microRNA-repressed mRNA and some translational repressors. They appear more heterogeneous than P-bodies of HeLa cells, and they rarely contain the exonuclease Xrn1 but are positive for rRNA. These particles show motorized movements along dendrites and relocalize to distant sites in response to synaptic activation. Furthermore, Dcp1a is stably associated with dlP-bodies in unstimulated cells, but exchanges rapidly on neuronal activation, concomitantly with the loss of Ago2 from dlP-bodies. Thus, dlP-bodies may regulate local translation by storing repressed mRNPs in unstimulated cells, and releasing them on synaptic activation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4155-08.2008

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • miRAP should capture miRNAs in neurites because AGO2 localizes in dendrites and tAGO2 signal can be detected in dendrites.

    “miRAP, on the other hand, should capture miRNAs in neurites since AGO2 has been shown to localize in dendtrites (Cougot et al., 2008, Lugli et al., 2005) and tAGO2 signal can be detected in dendrites (Figure 3).”

    From Cell-Type-Based Analysis of MicroRNA Profiles in the Mouse Brain (2012) · cites this paper as Cougot et al., 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pillai RS, Bhattacharyya SN, Filipowicz W (2007) Repression of protein syn- thesis by miRNAs: how many mechanisms? Trends Cell Biol 17:118 -126.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cougot, N., Bhattacharyya, S. N., Tapia-Arancibia, L., Bordonné, R., Filipowicz, W., Bertrand, E., & Rage, F.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2008-12-17
Volume
28
Issue
51
Pages
13793-13804
ISSN
  • 0270-6474
  • 1529-2401
Cited by
165
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review