Cited by 130Memory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Amygdala Neurons Differentially Encode Motivation and Reinforcement

Open access
Tye, Kay M., Janak, Patricia H.·2007·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Lesion studies demonstrate that the basolateral amygdala complex (BLA) is important for assigning motivational significance to sensory stimuli, but little is known about how this information is encoded. We used in vivo electrophysiology procedures to investigate how the amygdala encodes motivating and reinforcing properties of cues that induce reinstatement of reward-seeking behavior. Two groups of rats were trained to respond to a sucrose reward. The “paired” group was trained with a reward-predictive cue, whereas the “unpaired” group was trained with a randomly presented cue. Both groups underwent identical extinction and reinstatement procedures during which the reward was withheld. The proportion of neurons that were phasically cue responsive during reinstatement was significantly higher in the paired group (46 of 100) than in the unpaired group (8 of 112). Cues that induce reward-seeking behavior can do so by acting as incentives or reinforcers. Distinct populations of neurons responded to the cue in trials in which the cue acted as an incentive, triggering a motivated reward-seeking state, or as a reinforcer, supporting continued instrumental responding. The incentive motivation-encoding population of neurons (34 of 46 cue-responsive neurons; 74%) extinguished in temporal agreement with a decrease in the rate of instrumental responding. The conditioned reinforcement-encoding population of neurons (12 of 46 cue-responsive neurons; 26%) maintained their response for the duration of cue-reinforced instrumental responding. These data demonstrate that separate populations of cue-responsive neurons in the BLA encode the motivating or reinforcing properties of a cue previously associated with a reward.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5281-06.2007

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cues predicting threat are themselves recognized as threatening, and cues predicting reward themselves become rewarding.

    “In this way, cues predicting threat are themselves recognized as threatening60 and, likewise, those predicting reward themselves become rewarding61,62.”

    From Resolving the neural circuits of anxiety (2015) · cites this paper as [61]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Davis M (1992) The role of the amygdala in conditioned fear. In: The amyg- dala: neurological aspects of emotion, memory, and mental dysfunction (Aggleton JP, ed), pp 255-306. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tye, K. M., & Janak, P. H.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Janak, Patricia H.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2007-04-11
Volume
27
Issue
15
Pages
3937-3945
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2076741191
Cited by
130
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
basolateral amygdala, motivation, reinforcement, incentive motivation, conditioned reinforcement, reinstatement, extinction, reward-seeking behavior, sucrose reward, instrumental responding, neural coding
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Amygdala, Animals, Male, Motivation, Neurons, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reward, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review