Cited by 582Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Control of Response Selection by Reinforcer Value Requires Interaction of Amygdala and Orbital Prefrontal Cortex

Open access
Baxter, Mark G., Parker, Amanda, Lindner, Caroline C. C., Izquierdo, Alicia D., Murray, Elisabeth A.·2000·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Goal-directed actions are guided by expected outcomes of those actions. Humans with bilateral damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex, or the amygdala, are deficient in their ability to use information about positive and negative outcomes to guide their choice behavior. Similarly, rats and monkeys with orbital prefrontal or amygdala damage have been found to be impaired in their responses to changing values of outcomes. In the present study, we tested whether direct, functional interaction between the amygdala and the orbital prefrontal cortex is necessary for guiding behavior based on expected outcomes. Unlike control monkeys, rhesus monkeys with surgical disconnection of these two structures, achieved by crossed unilateral lesions of the amygdala in one hemisphere and orbital prefrontal cortex in the other, combined with forebrain commissurotomy, were unable to adjust their choice behavior after a change in the outcome (here, a reduction in the value of a particular reinforcer). The lesions did not affect motivation to work for a food reinforcer, or food preferences, per se. Hence, the amygdala and orbital prefrontal cortex act as part of an integrated neural system guiding decision-making and adaptive response selection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.20-11-04311.2000

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Animal studies show connectivity between the amygdala and orbital frontal cortex is important for assessing changes in emotional value of an object and adapting behavior accordingly.

    “These findings are in accordance with animal studies (Baxter et al. 2000) which show connectivity between the amgydala and orbital frontal cortex are important for assessing changes in emotional value of an object and adapting behavior accordingly.”

    From <i>The Adolescent Brain</i> (2008) · cites this paper as Baxter et al. 2000

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Amaral DG, Price JL, Pitka ¨nen A, Carmichael ST (1992) Anatomical organization of the primate amygdaloid complex. In: The amygdala: neuropsychological aspects of emotion, memory, and mental dysfunc- tion (Aggleton JP, ed), pp. 1-66. New York: Wiley-Liss.
  2. Davis M (1992) The role of the amygdala in conditioned fear. In: The amygdala: neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory, and mental dysfunction (Aggleton JP, ed), pp. 255-306. New York: Wiley-Liss.
  3. Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (1992) Amygdala-ventral striatal interactions and reward-related processes. In: The amygdala: neurobiological as- pects of emotion, memory, and mental dysfunction (Aggleton JP, ed), pp 401-429. New York: Wiley-Liss.
  4. Passingham RE (1993) The frontal lobes and voluntary action. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  5. Passingham RE, Toni I, Rushworth MFS (2000) Specialization within the prefrontal cortex: the ventral prefrontal cortex and associative learning. Exp Brain Res, in press.
  6. Rolls ET (1999) The brain and emotion. Oxford: Oxford UP.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baxter, M. G., Parker, A., Lindner, C. C. C., Izquierdo, A. D., & Murray, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2000-06-01
Volume
20
Issue
11
Pages
4311-4319
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2110270116
Cited by
582
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 24
FWCI
16.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, response selection, reinforcer value, decision-making, goal-directed behavior, commissurotomy, lesion studies, rhesus monkeys, food reinforcement, motivation
MeSH terms
Accommodation, Ocular, Amygdala, Animals, Discrimination, Psychological, Food, Macaca mulatta, Male, Motivation, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reinforcement Schedule, Reward, Satiety Response, Prosencephalon, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review